These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

135 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32908659)

  • 1. The Development of a Novel Device Based on Loss of Guidewire Resistance to Identify Epidural Space in a Porcine Model.
    Yang J; Choi R; Cho K; Kim S; Lee B; Lee K; Kim D; Lee J
    J Healthc Eng; 2020; 2020():8899628. PubMed ID: 32908659
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. False Loss of Resistance in Cervical Epidural Injection: The Loss of Resistance Technique Compared with the Epidrum Guidance in Locating Epidural Space.
    Lee JY; Lee SM; Sim WS; Ahn HJ; Park MH; Lim HY; Lee SH; Kim YR; Kim YI; Bang YJ
    Pain Physician; 2016 Mar; 19(3):131-8. PubMed ID: 27008286
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [Usefulness of Epidrum for teaching identification of the epidural space].
    Hirabayashi T; Kawamata T; Sakamoto A; Ikeno S; Minemura H; Ide S; Kurato T; Kawamata M
    Masui; 2011 Sep; 60(9):1078-81. PubMed ID: 21950041
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparison of loss of resistance technique between Epidrum® and conventional method for identifying the epidural space.
    Kim SW; Kim YM; Kim SH; Chung MH; Choi YR; Choi EM
    Korean J Anesthesiol; 2012 Apr; 62(4):322-6. PubMed ID: 22558497
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Novel 3D ultrasound system for midline single-operator epidurals: a feasibility study on a porcine model.
    Stone J; Beigi P; Rohling R; Lessoway V; Dube A; Gunka V
    Int J Obstet Anesth; 2017 May; 31():51-56. PubMed ID: 28684138
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A retrospective effectiveness study of loss of resistance to air or saline for identification of the epidural space.
    Segal S; Arendt KW
    Anesth Analg; 2010 Feb; 110(2):558-63. PubMed ID: 19955501
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Ultrasound: A novel alternative technique for cervical epidural space visualization-A pilot study.
    Asai OG; Gondode P; Raipure A; Saxena D; Tiwari V
    Ann Card Anaesth; 2023; 26(4):423-430. PubMed ID: 37861577
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Posterior epidural space depth: safety of the loss of resistance and hanging drop techniques.
    Hoffmann VL; Vercauteren MP; Vreugde JP; Hans GH; Coppejans HC; Adriaensen HA
    Br J Anaesth; 1999 Nov; 83(5):807-9. PubMed ID: 10690148
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Loss of resistance to normal saline is preferred to identify the epidural space: a survey of Canadian pediatric anesthesiologists.
    Ames WA; Hayes JA; Pétroz GC; Roy WL
    Can J Anaesth; 2005; 52(6):607-12. PubMed ID: 15983146
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Identification of the epidural space: usual practice among Spanish anesthesiologists].
    Figueredo E; Blanque R; García Villalba FJ; De Andrés J
    Rev Esp Anestesiol Reanim; 2005 Nov; 52(9):521-8. PubMed ID: 16363296
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Loss of resistance: A randomised controlled trial assessing four low-fidelity epidural puncture simulators.
    Pedersen TH; Meuli J; Plazikowski EJ; Buttenberg M; Kleine-Brueggeney M; Seidl C; Theiler L; Greif R
    Eur J Anaesthesiol; 2017 Sep; 34(9):602-608. PubMed ID: 28437262
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Real-time ultrasound-guided paramedian epidural access: evaluation of a novel in-plane technique.
    Karmakar MK; Li X; Ho AM; Kwok WH; Chui PT
    Br J Anaesth; 2009 Jun; 102(6):845-54. PubMed ID: 19398454
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A proposal of a simple epidural simulator for training novice anesthesiologists.
    Jeong SM; Choi JM; Kim JH; Yoo H; Lee S; Seo H; Kim S; Kim SH
    J Anesth; 2016 Aug; 30(4):591-5. PubMed ID: 27193185
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Quality of analgesia when air versus saline is used for identification of the epidural space in the parturient.
    Beilin Y; Arnold I; Telfeyan C; Bernstein HH; Hossain S
    Reg Anesth Pain Med; 2000; 25(6):596-9. PubMed ID: 11097666
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparison of Epidrum, Epi-Jet, and Loss of Resistance syringe techniques for identifying the epidural space in obstetric patients.
    Kartal S; Kösem B; Kılınç H; Köşker H; Karabayırlı S; Çimen NK; Demircioğlu RI
    Niger J Clin Pract; 2017 Aug; 20(8):992-997. PubMed ID: 28891544
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Techniques for identifying the epidural space].
    Figueredo E
    Rev Esp Anestesiol Reanim; 2005; 52(7):401-12. PubMed ID: 16200920
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Does the Technique for Assessing Loss of Resistance Alter the Magnitude of Epidural Needle Tip Overshoot?
    Cometa MA; Lopez BM; Vasilopoulos T; Destephens AJ; Bigos A; Lizdas DE; Gravenstein N; Lampotang S
    Simul Healthc; 2020 Jun; 15(3):154-159. PubMed ID: 32168291
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Air or nitrous oxide for loss-of-resistance epidural technique?
    Gaur V; Gupta RK; Agarwal A; Tripathi M; Gaur A
    Can J Anaesth; 2000 Jun; 47(6):503-5. PubMed ID: 10875711
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Efficacy of electrical stimulation on epidural anesthesia for cesarean section: a randomized controlled trial.
    Kim YS; Kim HS; Jeong H; Lee CH; Lee MK; Choi SS
    BMC Anesthesiol; 2020 Jun; 20(1):146. PubMed ID: 32522156
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Acoustic puncture assist device versus loss of resistance technique for epidural space identification.
    Mittal AK; Goel N; Chowdhury I; Shah SB; Singh BP; Jakhar P
    Indian J Anaesth; 2016 May; 60(5):330-6. PubMed ID: 27212720
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.