These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

167 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32908686)

  • 1. Comparison of Perimetric Outcomes from Melbourne Rapid Fields Tablet Perimeter Software and Humphrey Field Analyzer in Glaucoma Patients.
    Kumar H; Thulasidas M
    J Ophthalmol; 2020; 2020():8384509. PubMed ID: 32908686
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A Comparison of Perimetric Results from a Tablet Perimeter and Humphrey Field Analyzer in Glaucoma Patients.
    Kong YX; He M; Crowston JG; Vingrys AJ
    Transl Vis Sci Technol; 2016 Nov; 5(6):2. PubMed ID: 27847689
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparison of 24-2 Faster, Fast, and Standard Programs of Swedish Interactive Threshold Algorithm of Humphrey Field Analyzer for Perimetry in Patients With Manifest and Suspect Glaucoma.
    Thulasidas M; Patyal S
    J Glaucoma; 2020 Nov; 29(11):1070-1076. PubMed ID: 32890104
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Measuring Visual Fields in Children With Glaucoma Using a Portable Tablet.
    Gupta V; Kong GXY; Singh A; Panigrahi A; Gupta S; Prea S; Vingrys AJ
    Transl Vis Sci Technol; 2024 May; 13(5):10. PubMed ID: 38743410
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparison of Perimetric Outcomes from a Tablet Perimeter, Smart Visual Function Analyzer, and Humphrey Field Analyzer.
    Kang J; De Arrigunaga S; Freeman SE; Zhao Y; Lin M; Liebman DL; Roldan AM; Kim JA; Chang DS; Friedman DS; Elze T
    Ophthalmol Glaucoma; 2023; 6(5):509-520. PubMed ID: 36918066
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Six-month Longitudinal Comparison of a Portable Tablet Perimeter With the Humphrey Field Analyzer.
    Prea SM; Kong YXG; Mehta A; He M; Crowston JG; Gupta V; Martin KR; Vingrys AJ
    Am J Ophthalmol; 2018 Jun; 190():9-16. PubMed ID: 29550190
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Perimetric Comparison Between the IMOvifa and Humphrey Field Analyzer.
    Nishida T; Eslani M; Weinreb RN; Arias J; Vasile C; Mohammadzadeh V; Moghimi S
    J Glaucoma; 2023 Feb; 32(2):85-92. PubMed ID: 36223309
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Performance of iPad-based threshold perimetry in glaucoma and controls.
    Schulz AM; Graham EC; You Y; Klistorner A; Graham SL
    Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2018 May; 46(4):346-355. PubMed ID: 28976067
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Multicenter Comparison of the Toronto Portable Perimeter with the Humphrey Field Analyzer: A Pilot Study.
    Ahmed Y; Pereira A; Bowden S; Shi RB; Li Y; Ahmed IIK; Arshinoff SA
    Ophthalmol Glaucoma; 2022; 5(2):146-159. PubMed ID: 34358734
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Advanced Vision Analyzer-Virtual Reality Perimeter: Device Validation, Functional Correlation and Comparison with Humphrey Field Analyzer.
    Narang P; Agarwal A; Srinivasan M; Agarwal A
    Ophthalmol Sci; 2021 Jun; 1(2):100035. PubMed ID: 36249304
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Glaucoma Screening Using an iPad-Based Visual Field Test in a West African Population.
    Prince J; Thompson A; Mwanza JC; Tolleson-Rinehart S; Budenz DL
    Ophthalmol Glaucoma; 2022; 5(3):275-283. PubMed ID: 34537412
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparative Analysis of 10-2 Test on Advanced Vision Analyzer and Humphrey Perimeter in Glaucoma.
    Narang P; Agarwal A; Agarwal A; Narang R; Sundaramoorthy L
    Ophthalmol Sci; 2023 Jun; 3(2):100264. PubMed ID: 36846107
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparison of 30-2 Standard and Fast programs of Swedish Interactive Threshold Algorithm of Humphrey Field Analyzer for perimetry in patients with intracranial tumors.
    Singh MD; Jain K
    Indian J Ophthalmol; 2017 Nov; 65(11):1198-1202. PubMed ID: 29133651
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparison of the visual field test of Glaufield Lite with Humphrey Field Analyser.
    Behera G; Waghmare SV; Ramasamy A
    Int Ophthalmol; 2023 Feb; 43(2):557-565. PubMed ID: 35947251
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. 24-2 SITA Standard versus 24-2 SITA Faster in Perimetry-Naive Normal Subjects.
    Costa VP; Zangalli CS; Jammal AA; Medeiros FA; Miyazaki JVMK; Perez V; Nardi Boscaroli ML; Schimiti RB
    Ophthalmol Glaucoma; 2023; 6(2):129-136. PubMed ID: 35985477
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparison of Humphrey MATRIX and Swedish interactive threshold algorithm standard strategy in detecting early glaucomatous visual field loss.
    Prema R; George R; Hemamalini A; Sathyamangalam Ve R; Baskaran M; Vijaya L
    Indian J Ophthalmol; 2009; 57(3):207-11. PubMed ID: 19384015
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Assessment of false positives with the Humphrey Field Analyzer II perimeter with the SITA Algorithm.
    Newkirk MR; Gardiner SK; Demirel S; Johnson CA
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2006 Oct; 47(10):4632-7. PubMed ID: 17003461
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Evaluation of threshold estimation and learning effect of two perimetric strategies, SITA Fast and CLIP, in damaged visual fields.
    Capris P; Autuori S; Capris E; Papadia M
    Eur J Ophthalmol; 2008; 18(2):182-90. PubMed ID: 18320509
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comparing a head-mounted virtual reality perimeter and the Humphrey Field Analyzer for visual field testing in healthy and glaucoma patients.
    Phu J; Wang H; Kalloniatis M
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2024 Jan; 44(1):83-95. PubMed ID: 37803502
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparing Static Perimetry Protocols of Central Field Testing among Patients with Glaucoma.
    Behera G; Nath A; Ramasamy A; Kaliaperumal S
    Optom Vis Sci; 2023 Jun; 100(6):406-411. PubMed ID: 37129640
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.