BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

328 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32909086)

  • 1. Independent effects of statistical learning and top-down attention.
    Gao Y; Theeuwes J
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2020 Nov; 82(8):3895-3906. PubMed ID: 32909086
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Statistical regularities modulate attentional capture independent of search strategy.
    Wang B; Theeuwes J
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2018 Oct; 80(7):1763-1774. PubMed ID: 29968080
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Statistical learning in the absence of explicit top-down attention.
    Duncan D; Theeuwes J
    Cortex; 2020 Oct; 131():54-65. PubMed ID: 32801075
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. How to inhibit a distractor location? Statistical learning versus active, top-down suppression.
    Wang B; Theeuwes J
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2018 May; 80(4):860-870. PubMed ID: 29476331
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Implicit attentional biases in a changing environment.
    Wang B; Theeuwes J
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2020 May; 206():103064. PubMed ID: 32416329
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Learning to suppress a distractor is not affected by working memory load.
    Gao Y; Theeuwes J
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2020 Feb; 27(1):96-104. PubMed ID: 31797259
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Involuntary top-down control by search-irrelevant features: Visual working memory biases attention in an object-based manner.
    Foerster RM; Schneider WX
    Cognition; 2018 Mar; 172():37-45. PubMed ID: 29223864
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Statistical regularities bias overt attention.
    Wang B; Samara I; Theeuwes J
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2019 Aug; 81(6):1813-1821. PubMed ID: 30919311
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The role of top-down spatial attention in contingent attentional capture.
    Huang W; Su Y; Zhen Y; Qu Z
    Psychophysiology; 2016 May; 53(5):650-62. PubMed ID: 26879628
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Altering spatial priority maps via statistical learning of target selection and distractor filtering.
    Ferrante O; Patacca A; Di Caro V; Della Libera C; Santandrea E; Chelazzi L
    Cortex; 2018 May; 102():67-95. PubMed ID: 29096874
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The Role of Top-Down Focused Spatial Attention in Preattentive Salience Coding and Salience-based Attentional Capture.
    Bertleff S; Fink GR; Weidner R
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2016 Aug; 28(8):1152-65. PubMed ID: 27054402
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Spatial suppression due to statistical regularities in a visual detection task.
    van Moorselaar D; Theeuwes J
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2022 Feb; 84(2):450-458. PubMed ID: 34773244
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. No reliable effect of task-irrelevant cross-modal statistical regularities on distractor suppression.
    Jagini KK; Sunny MM
    Cortex; 2023 Apr; 161():77-92. PubMed ID: 36913824
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Test of a dynamic neural field model: spatial working memory is biased away from distractors.
    Schutte AR; DeGirolamo GJ
    Psychol Res; 2020 Sep; 84(6):1528-1544. PubMed ID: 30911825
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Top-Down Prioritization of Salient Items May Produce the So-Called Stimulus-Driven Capture.
    Benoni H
    Front Psychol; 2018; 9():218. PubMed ID: 29599731
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Attentional capture by alcohol-related stimuli may be activated involuntarily by top-down search goals.
    Brown CRH; Duka T; Forster S
    Psychopharmacology (Berl); 2018 Jul; 235(7):2087-2099. PubMed ID: 29696310
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Distractor suppression leads to reduced flanker interference.
    Ivanov Y; Theeuwes J
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2021 Feb; 83(2):624-636. PubMed ID: 33269439
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. No evidence for an attentional bias towards implicit temporal regularities.
    Damsma A; Taatgen N; de Jong R; van Rijn H
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2020 Jun; 82(3):1136-1149. PubMed ID: 31485992
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Spatial filtering restricts the attentional window during both singleton and feature-based visual search.
    Berggren N; Eimer M
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2020 Jul; 82(5):2360-2378. PubMed ID: 31993978
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Feature-based statistical regularities of distractors modulate attentional capture.
    Stilwell BT; Bahle B; Vecera SP
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2019 Mar; 45(3):419-433. PubMed ID: 30802131
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 17.