These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

116 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3290931)

  • 1. The power of analysis: statistical perspectives. Part 1.
    Pulver AE; Bartko JJ; McGrath JA
    Psychiatry Res; 1988 Mar; 23(3):295-9. PubMed ID: 3290931
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The prevalence of negative studies with inadequate statistical power: an analysis of the plastic surgery literature.
    Chung KC; Kalliainen LK; Spilson SV; Walters MR; Kim HM
    Plast Reconstr Surg; 2002 Jan; 109(1):1-6; discussion 7-8. PubMed ID: 11786783
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The power of analysis: statistical perspectives. Part 2.
    Bartko JJ; Pulver AE; Carpenter WT
    Psychiatry Res; 1988 Mar; 23(3):301-9. PubMed ID: 3290932
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Low power and type II errors in recent ophthalmology research.
    Khan Z; Milko J; Iqbal M; Masri M; Almeida DRP
    Can J Ophthalmol; 2016 Oct; 51(5):368-372. PubMed ID: 27769328
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Inadequate statistical power of negative clinical trials in urological literature.
    Breau RH; Carnat TA; Gaboury I
    J Urol; 2006 Jul; 176(1):263-6. PubMed ID: 16753417
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Basic statistics for clinicians: 1. Hypothesis testing.
    Guyatt G; Jaeschke R; Heddle N; Cook D; Shannon H; Walter S
    CMAJ; 1995 Jan; 152(1):27-32. PubMed ID: 7804919
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Negative clinical trials in cystic fibrosis research.
    Pattishall EN
    Pediatrics; 1990 Mar; 85(3):277-81. PubMed ID: 2406689
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Statistical significance versus clinical relevance. Part I. The essential role of the power of a statistical test.
    Luus HG; Muller FO; Meyer BH
    S Afr Med J; 1989 Nov; 76(10):568-70. PubMed ID: 2588088
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Statistical sampling and hypothesis testing in orthopaedic research.
    Bernstein J; McGuire K; Freedman KB
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2003 Aug; (413):55-62. PubMed ID: 12897596
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Low power, type II errors, and other statistical problems in recent cardiovascular research.
    Williams JL; Hathaway CA; Kloster KL; Layne BH
    Am J Physiol; 1997 Jul; 273(1 Pt 2):H487-93. PubMed ID: 9249522
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Statistical reporting deficiencies in environmental toxicology.
    Bosker T; Mudge JF; Munkittrick KR
    Environ Toxicol Chem; 2013 Aug; 32(8):1737-9. PubMed ID: 23553995
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Type II (beta) errors in the hand literature: the importance of power.
    Chung KC; Kalliainen LK; Hayward RA
    J Hand Surg Am; 1998 Jan; 23(1):20-5. PubMed ID: 9523949
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Inadequate statistical power to detect clinically significant differences in adverse event rates in randomized controlled trials.
    Tsang R; Colley L; Lynd LD
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2009 Jun; 62(6):609-16. PubMed ID: 19013761
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The Minimum Detectable Difference (MDD) Concept for Establishing Trust in Nonsignificant Results: A Critical Review.
    Mair MM; Kattwinkel M; Jakoby O; Hartig F
    Environ Toxicol Chem; 2020 Nov; 39(11):2109-2123. PubMed ID: 32786096
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The ironic effect of significant results on the credibility of multiple-study articles.
    Schimmack U
    Psychol Methods; 2012 Dec; 17(4):551-66. PubMed ID: 22924598
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. How many pigs? Statistical power considerations in swine nutrition experiments.
    Aaron DK; Hays VW
    J Anim Sci; 2004; 82 E-Suppl():E245-54. PubMed ID: 15471805
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Statistical power of psychological research: what have we gained in 20 years?
    Rossi JS
    J Consult Clin Psychol; 1990 Oct; 58(5):646-56. PubMed ID: 2254513
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Analysis and importance of statistical power and sample size in empirical scientific research].
    Klimek KM
    Wiad Lek; 2008; 61(7-9):211-5. PubMed ID: 19172834
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Statistical power in testing a hypothesis.
    Petrie A
    J Bone Joint Surg Br; 2010 Sep; 92(9):1192-4. PubMed ID: 20798433
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The power of tests for bioequivalence in feed experiments with poultry.
    Roush WB; Tozer PR
    J Anim Sci; 2004; 82 E-Suppl():E110-118. PubMed ID: 15471790
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.