These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
135 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32912136)
1. A comparison of BeadChip and WGS genotyping outputs using partial validation by sanger sequencing. Danilov KA; Nikogosov DA; Musienko SV; Baranova AV BMC Genomics; 2020 Sep; 21(Suppl 7):528. PubMed ID: 32912136 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Rapid Low-Cost Microarray-Based Genotyping for Genetic Screening in Primary Immunodeficiency. Suratannon N; van Wijck RTA; Broer L; Xue L; van Meurs JBJ; Barendregt BH; van der Burg M; Dik WA; Chatchatee P; Langerak AW; Swagemakers SMA; Goos JAC; Mathijssen IMJ; Dalm VASH; Suphapeetiporn K; Heezen KC; Drabwell J; Uitterlinden AG; van der Spek PJ; van Hagen PM; Front Immunol; 2020; 11():614. PubMed ID: 32373116 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparing BeadChip and WGS Genotyping: Non-Technical Failed Calling Is Attributable to Additional Variation within the Probe Target Sequence. Gershoni M; Shirak A; Raz R; Seroussi E Genes (Basel); 2022 Mar; 13(3):. PubMed ID: 35328039 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Whole-genome sequencing is more powerful than whole-exome sequencing for detecting exome variants. Belkadi A; Bolze A; Itan Y; Cobat A; Vincent QB; Antipenko A; Shang L; Boisson B; Casanova JL; Abel L Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2015 Apr; 112(17):5473-8. PubMed ID: 25827230 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Archived neonatal dried blood spot samples can be used for accurate whole genome and exome-targeted next-generation sequencing. Hollegaard MV; Grauholm J; Nielsen R; Grove J; Mandrup S; Hougaard DM Mol Genet Metab; 2013; 110(1-2):65-72. PubMed ID: 23830478 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A practical method to detect SNVs and indels from whole genome and exome sequencing data. Shigemizu D; Fujimoto A; Akiyama S; Abe T; Nakano K; Boroevich KA; Yamamoto Y; Furuta M; Kubo M; Nakagawa H; Tsunoda T Sci Rep; 2013; 3():2161. PubMed ID: 23831772 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Assessing single nucleotide variant detection and genotype calling on whole-genome sequenced individuals. Cheng AY; Teo YY; Ong RT Bioinformatics; 2014 Jun; 30(12):1707-13. PubMed ID: 24558117 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparison of genome sequencing and clinical genotyping for pharmacogenes. Yang W; Wu G; Broeckel U; Smith CA; Turner V; Haidar CE; Wang S; Carter R; Karol SE; Neale G; Crews KR; Yang JJ; Mullighan CG; Downing JR; Evans WE; Relling MV Clin Pharmacol Ther; 2016 Oct; 100(4):380-8. PubMed ID: 27311679 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Variant calling and genotyping accuracy of ddRAD-seq: Comparison with 20X WGS in layers. Doublet M; Degalez F; Lagarrigue S; Lagoutte L; Gueret E; Allais S; Lecerf F PLoS One; 2024; 19(7):e0298565. PubMed ID: 39058708 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Analytical validation of whole exome and whole genome sequencing for clinical applications. Linderman MD; Brandt T; Edelmann L; Jabado O; Kasai Y; Kornreich R; Mahajan M; Shah H; Kasarskis A; Schadt EE BMC Med Genomics; 2014 Apr; 7():20. PubMed ID: 24758382 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Empirical design of a variant quality control pipeline for whole genome sequencing data using replicate discordance. Adelson RP; Renton AE; Li W; Barzilai N; Atzmon G; Goate AM; Davies P; Freudenberg-Hua Y Sci Rep; 2019 Nov; 9(1):16156. PubMed ID: 31695094 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. iCall: a genotype-calling algorithm for rare, low-frequency and common variants on the Illumina exome array. Zhou J; Tantoso E; Wong LP; Ong RT; Bei JX; Li Y; Liu J; Khor CC; Teo YY Bioinformatics; 2014 Jun; 30(12):1714-20. PubMed ID: 24567545 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Establishing analytical validity of BeadChip array genotype data by comparison to whole-genome sequence and standard benchmark datasets. Cherukuri PF; Soe MM; Condon DE; Bartaria S; Meis K; Gu S; Frost FG; Fricke LM; Lubieniecki KP; Lubieniecka JM; Pyatt RE; Hajek C; Boerkoel CF; Carmichael L BMC Med Genomics; 2022 Mar; 15(1):56. PubMed ID: 35287663 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A comparative investigation of single nucleotide variant calling for a personal non-Caucasian sequencing sample. Park H; Gim J Genes Genomics; 2023 Dec; 45(12):1527-1536. PubMed ID: 37651066 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Empirical evaluation of variant calling accuracy using ultra-deep whole-genome sequencing data. Kishikawa T; Momozawa Y; Ozeki T; Mushiroda T; Inohara H; Kamatani Y; Kubo M; Okada Y Sci Rep; 2019 Feb; 9(1):1784. PubMed ID: 30741997 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. One Size Doesn't Fit All - RefEditor: Building Personalized Diploid Reference Genome to Improve Read Mapping and Genotype Calling in Next Generation Sequencing Studies. Yuan S; Johnston HR; Zhang G; Li Y; Hu YJ; Qin ZS PLoS Comput Biol; 2015 Aug; 11(8):e1004448. PubMed ID: 26267278 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A strategy to improve phasing of whole-genome sequenced individuals through integration of familial information from dense genotype panels. Faux P; Druet T Genet Sel Evol; 2017 May; 49(1):46. PubMed ID: 28511677 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparison and evaluation of two exome capture kits and sequencing platforms for variant calling. Zhang G; Wang J; Yang J; Li W; Deng Y; Li J; Huang J; Hu S; Zhang B BMC Genomics; 2015 Aug; 16(1):581. PubMed ID: 26242175 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]