These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

318 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32912292)

  • 1. Computerised tomography-based planning with conventional total hip arthroplasty versus robotic-arm assisted total hip arthroplasty: study protocol for a prospective randomised controlled trial.
    Kayani B; Konan S; Tahmassebi J; Ayuob A; Haddad FS
    Trials; 2020 Sep; 21(1):776. PubMed ID: 32912292
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The direct superior approach versus posterior approach for total hip arthroplasty: study protocol for a prospective double-blinded randomised control trial.
    Kayani B; Konan S; Tahmassebi J; Ayuob A; Haddad FS
    Trials; 2020 Jun; 21(1):546. PubMed ID: 32560737
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A prospective double-blinded randomised control trial comparing robotic arm-assisted functionally aligned total knee arthroplasty versus robotic arm-assisted mechanically aligned total knee arthroplasty.
    Kayani B; Konan S; Tahmassebi J; Oussedik S; Moriarty PD; Haddad FS
    Trials; 2020 Feb; 21(1):194. PubMed ID: 32070406
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Robotic-arm assisted medial unicondylar knee arthroplasty versus jig-based unicompartmental knee arthroplasty with navigation control: study protocol for a prospective randomised controlled trial.
    Kayani B; Konan S; Tahmassebi J; Ayuob A; Moriarty PD; Haddad FS
    Trials; 2020 Aug; 21(1):721. PubMed ID: 32807219
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A prospective randomized controlled trial comparing CT-based planning with conventional total hip arthroplasty versus robotic arm-assisted total hip arthroplasty.
    Fontalis A; Kayani B; Plastow R; Giebaly DE; Tahmassebi J; Haddad IC; Chambers A; Mancino F; Konan S; Haddad FS
    Bone Joint J; 2024 Apr; 106-B(4):324-335. PubMed ID: 38555946
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Patient-Reported Outcome Measures in Conventional Total Hip Arthroplasty Versus Robotic-Arm Assisted Arthroplasty: A Prospective Cohort Study With Minimum 3 Years' Follow-Up.
    Fontalis A; Kayani B; Haddad IC; Donovan C; Tahmassebi J; Haddad FS
    J Arthroplasty; 2023 Jul; 38(7 Suppl 2):S324-S329. PubMed ID: 37105324
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A prospective randomised controlled trial of mechanical axis with soft tissue release balancing vs functional alignment with bony resection balancing in total knee replacement-a study using Stryker Mako robotic arm-assisted technology.
    Young SW; Zeng N; Tay ML; Fulker D; Esposito C; Carter M; Bayan A; Farrington B; Van Rooyen R; Walker M
    Trials; 2022 Jul; 23(1):580. PubMed ID: 35858944
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The learning curve of robotic-arm assisted acetabular cup positioning during total hip arthroplasty.
    Kayani B; Konan S; Huq SS; Ibrahim MS; Ayuob A; Haddad FS
    Hip Int; 2021 May; 31(3):311-319. PubMed ID: 31838874
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Assuring the long-term total joint arthroplasty: a triad of variables.
    Kayani B; Konan S; Thakrar RR; Huq SS; Haddad FS
    Bone Joint J; 2019 Jan; 101-B(1_Supple_A):11-18. PubMed ID: 30648491
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Robotic- and orthosensor-assisted versus manual (ROAM) total knee replacement: a study protocol for a randomised controlled trial.
    Clement ND; Bardgett M; Galloway S; Baron YJ; Smith K; Weir DJ; Deehan DJ
    Trials; 2022 Jan; 23(1):70. PubMed ID: 35065657
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Two-Dimensional Versus Three-Dimensional Preoperative Planning in Total Hip Arthroplasty.
    Fontalis A; Yasen AT; Kayani B; Luo TD; Mancino F; Magan A; Plastow R; Haddad FS
    J Arthroplasty; 2024 Sep; 39(9S1):S80-S87. PubMed ID: 38810812
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. UK robotic arthroplasty clinical and cost effectiveness randomised controlled trial for hips (RACER-Hip): a study protocol.
    Griffin J; Davis ET; Parsons H; Stevens S; Bradley H; Bruce J; Ellard DR; Haddad F; Hutchinson CE; Mason J; Nwankwo H; Metcalfe A; Smith T; Smith J; Warwick J; Skinner JA; Rees S; Underwood M; Khatri C; Wall PDH
    BMJ Open; 2023 Oct; 13(10):e079328. PubMed ID: 37852762
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparison of Surgical Time, Short-term Adverse Events, and Implant Placement Accuracy Between Manual, Robotic-assisted, and Computer-navigated Total Hip Arthroplasty: A Network Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.
    Kunze KN; Bovonratwet P; Polce EM; Paul K; Sculco PK
    J Am Acad Orthop Surg Glob Res Rev; 2022 Apr; 6(4):. PubMed ID: 35472191
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Robotic-Assisted versus Manually Implanted Total Hip Arthroplasty: A Clinical and Radiographic Comparison.
    Hadley CJ; Grossman EL; Mont MA; Salem HS; Catani F; Marcovigi A
    Surg Technol Int; 2020 Nov; 37():371-376. PubMed ID: 33175395
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Prospective randomized controlled trial on the accuracy of prosthesis positioning in total hip arthroplasty assisted by a newly designed whole-process robotic arm.
    Wang W; Zhang Z; Wang G; Rong C; Xu H; Lu X; Liu Y; Li C; Zhang H
    Int Orthop; 2023 Feb; 47(2):413-419. PubMed ID: 35802187
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. CT-based, robotic-arm assisted total hip arthroplasty (Mako) through anterior approach provides improved cup placement accuracy but no difference in clinical outcomes when compared to conventional technique.
    Incesoy MA; Yildiz F; Pulatkan MA; Yesiller OF; Toluk O; Erdem AC; Tuncay I
    Technol Health Care; 2024; 32(5):3681-3691. PubMed ID: 38217557
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Is there increased value in robotic arm-assisted total hip arthroplasty? : a nationwide outcomes, trends, and projections analysis of 4,699,894 cases.
    Emara AK; Zhou G; Klika AK; Koroukian SM; Schiltz NK; Higuera-Rueda CA; Molloy RM; Piuzzi NS
    Bone Joint J; 2021 Sep; 103-B(9):1488-1496. PubMed ID: 34465149
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Blood transfusion, hospital stay and learning curve in robotic assisted total hip arthroplasty.
    Caldora P; D'Urso A; Banchetti R; Arniani S; Colcelli D; Ciampalini L; Guastafierro P; Lup D
    J Biol Regul Homeost Agents; 2020; 34(4 Suppl. 3):37-49. Congress of the Italian Orthopaedic Research Society. PubMed ID: 33261255
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The current role of robotics in total hip arthroplasty.
    Kayani B; Konan S; Ayuob A; Ayyad S; Haddad FS
    EFORT Open Rev; 2019 Nov; 4(11):618-625. PubMed ID: 31754468
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Intraoperative placement of total hip arthroplasty components with robotic-arm assisted technology correlates with postoperative implant position: a CT-based study.
    Nodzo SR; Chang CC; Carroll KM; Barlow BT; Banks SA; Padgett DE; Mayman DJ; Jerabek SA
    Bone Joint J; 2018 Oct; 100-B(10):1303-1309. PubMed ID: 30295538
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 16.