155 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32912840)
1. Evaluation of Fluorescent Confocal Microscopy for Intraoperative Analysis of Prostate Biopsy Cores.
Marenco J; Calatrava A; Casanova J; Claps F; Mascaros J; Wong A; Barrios M; Martin I; Rubio J
Eur Urol Focus; 2021 Nov; 7(6):1254-1259. PubMed ID: 32912840
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Digital Biopsy with Fluorescence Confocal Microscope for Effective Real-time Diagnosis of Prostate Cancer: A Prospective, Comparative Study.
Rocco B; Sighinolfi MC; Sandri M; Spandri V; Cimadamore A; Volavsek M; Mazzucchelli R; Lopez-Beltran A; Eissa A; Bertoni L; Azzoni P; Reggiani Bonetti L; Maiorana A; Puliatti S; Micali S; Paterlini M; Iseppi A; Rocco F; Pellacani G; Chester J; Bianchi G; Montironi R
Eur Urol Oncol; 2021 Oct; 4(5):784-791. PubMed ID: 32952095
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Ex vivo fluorescence confocal microscopy: the first application for real-time pathological examination of prostatic tissue.
Puliatti S; Bertoni L; Pirola GM; Azzoni P; Bevilacqua L; Eissa A; Elsherbiny A; Sighinolfi MC; Chester J; Kaleci S; Rocco B; Micali S; Bagni I; Bonetti LR; Maiorana A; Malvehy J; Longo C; Montironi R; Bianchi G; Pellacani G
BJU Int; 2019 Sep; 124(3):469-476. PubMed ID: 30908852
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Optimizing the Number of Cores Targeted During Prostate Magnetic Resonance Imaging Fusion Target Biopsy.
Kenigsberg AP; Renson A; Rosenkrantz AB; Huang R; Wysock JS; Taneja SS; Bjurlin MA
Eur Urol Oncol; 2018 Oct; 1(5):418-425. PubMed ID: 31158081
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Validation of real-time prostatic biopsies evaluation with fluorescence laser confocal microscopy.
Gobbo S; Eccher A; Gallina S; D'Aietti D; Princiotta A; Ditonno F; Tafuri A; Cerruto MA; Marletta S; Sanguedolce F; Scarpa A; Brunelli M; Antonelli A
Minerva Urol Nephrol; 2023 Oct; 75(5):577-582. PubMed ID: 37486217
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Ex vivo fluorescence confocal microscopy: prostatic and periprostatic tissues atlas and evaluation of the learning curve.
Bertoni L; Puliatti S; Reggiani Bonetti L; Maiorana A; Eissa A; Azzoni P; Bevilacqua L; Spandri V; Kaleci S; Zoeir A; Sighinolfi MC; Micali S; Bianchi G; Pellacani G; Rocco B; Montironi R
Virchows Arch; 2020 Apr; 476(4):511-520. PubMed ID: 31907606
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Digital Frozen Sections with Fluorescence Confocal Microscopy During Robot-assisted Radical Prostatectomy: Surgical Technique.
Rocco B; Sarchi L; Assumma S; Cimadamore A; Montironi R; Reggiani Bonetti L; Turri F; De Carne C; Puliatti S; Maiorana A; Pellacani G; Micali S; Bianchi G; Sighinolfi MC
Eur Urol; 2021 Dec; 80(6):724-729. PubMed ID: 33965288
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Digital real-time microscopy of ex-vivo tissues: A novel strategy to control surgical accuracy.
Sighinolfi MC; Cimadamore A; Cassani A; Assumma S; Sarchi L; Filippi B; Turri F; Reggiani Bonetti L; Maiorana A; Eissa A; Micali S; Montironi R; Rocco B
Urologia; 2023 Feb; 90(1):146-150. PubMed ID: 37014088
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging/Ultrasound Fusion Prostate Biopsy-Are 2 Biopsy Cores per Magnetic Resonance Imaging Lesion Required?
Dimitroulis P; Rabenalt R; Nini A; Hiester A; Esposito I; Schimmöller L; Antoch G; Albers P; Arsov C
J Urol; 2018 Nov; 200(5):1030-1034. PubMed ID: 29733837
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Intraoperative Digital Analysis of Ablation Margins (DAAM) by Fluorescent Confocal Microscopy to Improve Partial Prostate Gland Cryoablation Outcomes.
Selvaggio O; Falagario UG; Bruno SM; Recchia M; Sighinolfi MC; Sanguedolce F; Milillo P; Macarini L; Rastinehad AR; Sanchez-Salas R; Barret E; Lugnani F; Rocco B; Cormio L; Carrieri G
Cancers (Basel); 2021 Aug; 13(17):. PubMed ID: 34503192
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Prebiopsy Biparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging Combined with Prostate-specific Antigen Density in Detecting and Ruling out Gleason 7-10 Prostate Cancer in Biopsy-naïve Men.
Boesen L; Nørgaard N; Løgager V; Balslev I; Bisbjerg R; Thestrup KC; Jakobsen H; Thomsen HS
Eur Urol Oncol; 2019 May; 2(3):311-319. PubMed ID: 31200846
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The diagnostic accuracy and cost-effectiveness of magnetic resonance spectroscopy and enhanced magnetic resonance imaging techniques in aiding the localisation of prostate abnormalities for biopsy: a systematic review and economic evaluation.
Mowatt G; Scotland G; Boachie C; Cruickshank M; Ford JA; Fraser C; Kurban L; Lam TB; Padhani AR; Royle J; Scheenen TW; Tassie E
Health Technol Assess; 2013 May; 17(20):vii-xix, 1-281. PubMed ID: 23697373
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The Role of Systematic and Targeted Biopsies in Light of Overlap on Magnetic Resonance Imaging Ultrasound Fusion Biopsy.
Patel N; Cricco-Lizza E; Kasabwala K; Xu C; Robinson BD; Khani F; Wang Y; Margolis D; Hu JC
Eur Urol Oncol; 2018 Sep; 1(4):263-267. PubMed ID: 31100246
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Head-to-head Comparison of Transrectal Ultrasound-guided Prostate Biopsy Versus Multiparametric Prostate Resonance Imaging with Subsequent Magnetic Resonance-guided Biopsy in Biopsy-naïve Men with Elevated Prostate-specific Antigen: A Large Prospective Multicenter Clinical Study.
van der Leest M; Cornel E; Israël B; Hendriks R; Padhani AR; Hoogenboom M; Zamecnik P; Bakker D; Setiasti AY; Veltman J; van den Hout H; van der Lelij H; van Oort I; Klaver S; Debruyne F; Sedelaar M; Hannink G; Rovers M; Hulsbergen-van de Kaa C; Barentsz JO
Eur Urol; 2019 Apr; 75(4):570-578. PubMed ID: 30477981
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A prospective, blinded comparison of magnetic resonance (MR) imaging-ultrasound fusion and visual estimation in the performance of MR-targeted prostate biopsy: the PROFUS trial.
Wysock JS; Rosenkrantz AB; Huang WC; Stifelman MD; Lepor H; Deng FM; Melamed J; Taneja SS
Eur Urol; 2014 Aug; 66(2):343-51. PubMed ID: 24262102
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparison of Real-Time Fluorescence Confocal Digital Microscopy With Hematoxylin-Eosin-Stained Sections of Core-Needle Biopsy Specimens.
Krishnamurthy S; Sabir S; Ban K; Wu Y; Sheth R; Tam A; Meric-Bernstam F; Shaw K; Mills G; Bassett R; Hamilton S; Hicks M; Gupta S
JAMA Netw Open; 2020 Mar; 3(3):e200476. PubMed ID: 32134465
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Role of In Vivo Reflectance Confocal Microscopy in the Analysis of Melanocytic Lesions.
Serban ED; Farnetani F; Pellacani G; Constantin MM
Acta Dermatovenerol Croat; 2018 Apr; 26(1):64-67. PubMed ID: 29782304
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Role of Core Number and Location in Targeted Magnetic Resonance Imaging-Ultrasound Fusion Prostate Biopsy.
Lu AJ; Syed JS; Ghabili K; Hsiang WR; Nguyen KA; Leapman MS; Sprenkle PC
Eur Urol; 2019 Jul; 76(1):14-17. PubMed ID: 31047733
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Real-Time Urethral and Ureteral Assessment during Radical Cystectomy Using Ex-Vivo Optical Imaging: A Novel Technique for the Evaluation of Fresh Unfixed Surgical Margins.
Prata F; Anceschi U; Taffon C; Rossi SM; Verri M; Iannuzzi A; Ragusa A; Esperto F; Prata SM; Crescenzi A; Scarpa RM; Simone G; Papalia R
Curr Oncol; 2023 Mar; 30(3):3421-3431. PubMed ID: 36975472
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Detection of Significant Prostate Cancer Using Target Saturation in Transperineal Magnetic Resonance Imaging/Transrectal Ultrasonography-fusion Biopsy.
Tschirdewahn S; Wiesenfarth M; Bonekamp D; Püllen L; Reis H; Panic A; Kesch C; Darr C; Heß J; Giganti F; Moore CM; Guberina N; Forsting M; Wetter A; Hadaschik B; Radtke JP
Eur Urol Focus; 2021 Nov; 7(6):1300-1307. PubMed ID: 32660838
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
