These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

156 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32913168)

  • 1. Marginal discrepancy of 3-unit Co-Cr metal copings fabricated with additive and subtractive manners: A comparative study.
    Onoral O
    Niger J Clin Pract; 2020 Sep; 23(9):1274-1280. PubMed ID: 32913168
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A microcomputed tomography evaluation of the marginal fit of cobalt-chromium alloy copings fabricated by new manufacturing techniques and alloy systems.
    Kim EH; Lee DH; Kwon SM; Kwon TY
    J Prosthet Dent; 2017 Mar; 117(3):393-399. PubMed ID: 27677219
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Influence of repeated firings on marginal, axial, axio-occlusal, and occlusal fit of metal-ceramic restorations fabricated with different techniques.
    Önöral Ö; Ulusoy M; Seker E; Etikan İ
    J Prosthet Dent; 2018 Sep; 120(3):415-420. PubMed ID: 29627208
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Effects of repeated firing on the marginal accuracy of Co-Cr copings fabricated by selective laser melting.
    Zeng L; Zhang Y; Liu Z; Wei B
    J Prosthet Dent; 2015 Feb; 113(2):135-9. PubMed ID: 25444279
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Clinical marginal and internal fit of metal ceramic crowns fabricated with a selective laser melting technology.
    Huang Z; Zhang L; Zhu J; Zhang X
    J Prosthet Dent; 2015 Jun; 113(6):623-7. PubMed ID: 25794918
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Effect of production method on surface roughness, marginal and internal fit, and retention of cobalt-chromium single crowns.
    Lövgren N; Roxner R; Klemendz S; Larsson C
    J Prosthet Dent; 2017 Jul; 118(1):95-101. PubMed ID: 28024818
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Effect of manufacturing techniques on the marginal and internal fit of cobalt-chromium implant-supported multiunit frameworks.
    Akçin ET; Güncü MB; Aktaş G; Aslan Y
    J Prosthet Dent; 2018 Nov; 120(5):715-720. PubMed ID: 30017153
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Clinical marginal and internal adaptation of CAD/CAM milling, laser sintering, and cast metal ceramic crowns.
    Tamac E; Toksavul S; Toman M
    J Prosthet Dent; 2014 Oct; 112(4):909-13. PubMed ID: 24819532
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Effect of porcelain firing and cementation on the marginal fit of implant-supported metal-ceramic restorations fabricated by additive or subtractive manufacturing methods.
    Yildirim B
    J Prosthet Dent; 2020 Oct; 124(4):476.e1-476.e6. PubMed ID: 32451142
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The Effect of Milling Metal Versus Milling Wax on Implant Framework Retention and Adaptation.
    Ghodsi S; Pirmoazen S; Beyabanaki E; Rostami M; Alikhasi M
    J Prosthodont; 2019 Feb; 28(2):e739-e743. PubMed ID: 29855135
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Effect of repeated ceramic firings on the marginal and internal adaptation of metal-ceramic restorations fabricated with different CAD-CAM technologies.
    Kocaağaoğlu H; Albayrak H; Kilinc HI; Gümüs HÖ
    J Prosthet Dent; 2017 Nov; 118(5):672-677. PubMed ID: 28385435
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Accuracy of CAD-CAM milling versus conventional lost-wax casting for single metal copings: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Yang J; Li H
    J Prosthet Dent; 2024 Jul; 132(1):51-58. PubMed ID: 35788274
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Effect of different finish line preparations on the marginal and internal adaptation of cobalt-chromium metal alloy copings fabricated by using CAD-CAM technology: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Shah N; Badwaik P; Sheth VH; Bhatnagar V; Bhanushali N; Patil P
    J Prosthet Dent; 2022 May; 127(5):716-728.e6. PubMed ID: 34716012
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Effect of repeated firings on the marginal and internal adaptation of implant-supported metal-ceramic restorations fabricated with different thicknesses and fabrication methods.
    Ogunc A; Yildirim Avcu G
    J Prosthet Dent; 2021 Mar; 125(3):504.e1-504.e6. PubMed ID: 33551136
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Evaluation of the fit of metal ceramic restorations fabricated with a pre-sintered soft alloy.
    Park JK; Kim HY; Kim WC; Kim JH
    J Prosthet Dent; 2016 Dec; 116(6):909-915. PubMed ID: 27422236
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Marginal fit of metal-ceramic crowns fabricated by using a casting and two selective laser melting processes before and after ceramic firing.
    Hong MH; Min BK; Lee DH; Kwon TY
    J Prosthet Dent; 2019 Nov; 122(5):475-481. PubMed ID: 30982615
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Evaluation of the fit of metal copings fabricated using stereolithography.
    Kim SB; Kim NH; Kim JH; Moon HS
    J Prosthet Dent; 2018 Nov; 120(5):693-698. PubMed ID: 29807735
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparison and evaluation of marginal and internal gaps in cobalt-chromium alloy copings fabricated using subtractive and additive manufacturing.
    Kim DY; Kim JH; Kim HY; Kim WC
    J Prosthodont Res; 2018 Jan; 62(1):56-64. PubMed ID: 28663024
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Internal adaptation of cobalt-chromium posts fabricated by selective laser melting technology.
    Liu W; Qing H; Pei X; Wang J
    J Prosthet Dent; 2019 Mar; 121(3):455-460. PubMed ID: 30126687
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. In vitro evaluation of marginal, axial, and occlusal discrepancies in metal ceramic restorations produced with new technologies.
    Kocaağaoğlu H; Kılınç Hİ; Albayrak H; Kara M
    J Prosthet Dent; 2016 Sep; 116(3):368-74. PubMed ID: 27130177
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.