147 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32913202)
1. Automated detection of cribriform growth patterns in prostate histology images.
Ambrosini P; Hollemans E; Kweldam CF; Leenders GJLHV; Stallinga S; Vos F
Sci Rep; 2020 Sep; 10(1):14904. PubMed ID: 32913202
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Going deeper through the Gleason scoring scale: An automatic end-to-end system for histology prostate grading and cribriform pattern detection.
Silva-Rodríguez J; Colomer A; Sales MA; Molina R; Naranjo V
Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2020 Oct; 195():105637. PubMed ID: 32653747
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Automated deep-learning system for Gleason grading of prostate cancer using biopsies: a diagnostic study.
Bulten W; Pinckaers H; van Boven H; Vink R; de Bel T; van Ginneken B; van der Laak J; Hulsbergen-van de Kaa C; Litjens G
Lancet Oncol; 2020 Feb; 21(2):233-241. PubMed ID: 31926805
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Role of Magnetic Resonance Imaging Targeted Biopsy in Detection of Prostate Cancer Harboring Adverse Pathological Features of Intraductal Carcinoma and Invasive Cribriform Carcinoma.
Prendeville S; Gertner M; Maganti M; Pintilie M; Perlis N; Toi A; Evans AJ; Finelli A; van der Kwast TH; Ghai S
J Urol; 2018 Jul; 200(1):104-113. PubMed ID: 29408568
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Combining weakly and strongly supervised learning improves strong supervision in Gleason pattern classification.
Otálora S; Marini N; Müller H; Atzori M
BMC Med Imaging; 2021 May; 21(1):77. PubMed ID: 33964886
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Development and Validation of an Artificial Intelligence-Powered Platform for Prostate Cancer Grading and Quantification.
Huang W; Randhawa R; Jain P; Iczkowski KA; Hu R; Hubbard S; Eickhoff J; Basu H; Roy R
JAMA Netw Open; 2021 Nov; 4(11):e2132554. PubMed ID: 34730818
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Grading of invasive cribriform carcinoma on prostate needle biopsy: an interobserver study among experts in genitourinary pathology.
Latour M; Amin MB; Billis A; Egevad L; Grignon DJ; Humphrey PA; Reuter VE; Sakr WA; Srigley JR; Wheeler TM; Yang XJ; Epstein JI
Am J Surg Pathol; 2008 Oct; 32(10):1532-9. PubMed ID: 18724248
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Artificial intelligence for diagnosis and grading of prostate cancer in biopsies: a population-based, diagnostic study.
Ström P; Kartasalo K; Olsson H; Solorzano L; Delahunt B; Berney DM; Bostwick DG; Evans AJ; Grignon DJ; Humphrey PA; Iczkowski KA; Kench JG; Kristiansen G; van der Kwast TH; Leite KRM; McKenney JK; Oxley J; Pan CC; Samaratunga H; Srigley JR; Takahashi H; Tsuzuki T; Varma M; Zhou M; Lindberg J; Lindskog C; Ruusuvuori P; Wählby C; Grönberg H; Rantalainen M; Egevad L; Eklund M
Lancet Oncol; 2020 Feb; 21(2):222-232. PubMed ID: 31926806
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Diagnostic Accuracy of Prostate Biopsy for Detecting Cribriform Gleason Pattern 4 Carcinoma and Intraductal Carcinoma in Paired Radical Prostatectomy Specimens: Implications for Active Surveillance.
Ericson KJ; Wu SS; Lundy SD; Thomas LJ; Klein EA; McKenney JK
J Urol; 2020 Feb; 203(2):311-319. PubMed ID: 31483693
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Deep learning for automatic Gleason pattern classification for grade group determination of prostate biopsies.
Lucas M; Jansen I; Savci-Heijink CD; Meijer SL; de Boer OJ; van Leeuwen TG; de Bruin DM; Marquering HA
Virchows Arch; 2019 Jul; 475(1):77-83. PubMed ID: 31098801
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. An Artificial Intelligence-based Support Tool for Automation and Standardisation of Gleason Grading in Prostate Biopsies.
Marginean F; Arvidsson I; Simoulis A; Christian Overgaard N; Åström K; Heyden A; Bjartell A; Krzyzanowska A
Eur Urol Focus; 2021 Sep; 7(5):995-1001. PubMed ID: 33303404
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A comparison of interobserver reproducibility of Gleason grading of prostatic carcinoma in Japan and the United States.
Oyama T; Allsbrook WC; Kurokawa K; Matsuda H; Segawa A; Sano T; Suzuki K; Epstein JI
Arch Pathol Lab Med; 2005 Aug; 129(8):1004-10. PubMed ID: 16048389
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Significance of the cribriform pattern in prostatic adenocarcinomas.
Sarbay BC; Kir G; Topal CS; Gumus E
Pathol Res Pract; 2014 Sep; 210(9):554-7. PubMed ID: 24831265
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Gleason grade 4 prostate adenocarcinoma patterns: an interobserver agreement study among genitourinary pathologists.
Kweldam CF; Nieboer D; Algaba F; Amin MB; Berney DM; Billis A; Bostwick DG; Bubendorf L; Cheng L; Compérat E; Delahunt B; Egevad L; Evans AJ; Hansel DE; Humphrey PA; Kristiansen G; van der Kwast TH; Magi-Galluzzi C; Montironi R; Netto GJ; Samaratunga H; Srigley JR; Tan PH; Varma M; Zhou M; van Leenders GJ
Histopathology; 2016 Sep; 69(3):441-9. PubMed ID: 27028587
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Intraductal carcinoma of the prostate: interobserver reproducibility survey of 39 urologic pathologists.
Iczkowski KA; Egevad L; Ma J; Harding-Jackson N; Algaba F; Billis A; Camparo P; Cheng L; Clouston D; Comperat EM; Datta MW; Evans AG; Griffiths DF; Guo CC; Hailemariam S; Huang W; Humphrey PA; Jiang Z; Kahane H; Kristiansen G; La Rosa FG; Lopez-Beltran A; MacLennan GT; Magi-Galluzzi C; Merrimen J; Montironi R; Osunkoya AO; Picken MM; Rao N; Shah RB; Shanks JH; Shen SS; Tawfik OW; True LD; Van der Kwast T; Varma M; Wheeler TM; Zynger DL; Sahr N; Bostwick DG
Ann Diagn Pathol; 2014 Dec; 18(6):333-42. PubMed ID: 25263387
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Does prostatic ductal adenocarcinoma exist?
Bock BJ; Bostwick DG
Am J Surg Pathol; 1999 Jul; 23(7):781-5. PubMed ID: 10403300
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Improving the Rotterdam European Randomized Study of Screening for Prostate Cancer Risk Calculator for Initial Prostate Biopsy by Incorporating the 2014 International Society of Urological Pathology Gleason Grading and Cribriform growth.
Roobol MJ; Verbeek JFM; van der Kwast T; Kümmerlin IP; Kweldam CF; van Leenders GJLH
Eur Urol; 2017 Jul; 72(1):45-51. PubMed ID: 28162815
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A computer-aided diagnosis system for differentiation and delineation of malignant regions on whole-slide prostate histopathology image using spatial statistics and multidimensional DenseNet.
Chen CM; Huang YS; Fang PW; Liang CW; Chang RF
Med Phys; 2020 Mar; 47(3):1021-1033. PubMed ID: 31834623
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Utility of Gleason pattern 4 morphologies detected on transrectal ultrasound (TRUS)-guided biopsies for prediction of upgrading or upstaging in Gleason score 3 + 4 = 7 prostate cancer.
Flood TA; Schieda N; Keefe DT; Breau RH; Morash C; Hogan K; Belanger EC; Mai KT; Robertson SJ
Virchows Arch; 2016 Sep; 469(3):313-9. PubMed ID: 27394432
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Deep Learning-Based Gleason Grading of Prostate Cancer From Histopathology Images-Role of Multiscale Decision Aggregation and Data Augmentation.
Karimi D; Nir G; Fazli L; Black PC; Goldenberg L; Salcudean SE
IEEE J Biomed Health Inform; 2020 May; 24(5):1413-1426. PubMed ID: 31567104
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
