These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
183 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3291660)
1. Minimizing malpractice risks by role clarification. The confusing transition from tort to contract. Green JA Ann Intern Med; 1988 Aug; 109(3):234-41. PubMed ID: 3291660 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Judicial and legislative viewpoints on physician misestimation of patient dysutilities: a problem for decision analysts. Mazur DJ Med Decis Making; 1990; 10(3):172-80. PubMed ID: 2196411 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Negligence in securing informed consent and medical malpractice. Perry C J Med Humanit Bioeth; 1988; 9(2):111-20. PubMed ID: 10296750 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Patient participation in medical decision-making: are the courts the answer? Bromberger B Univ N S W Law J; 1983; 6(1):1-23. PubMed ID: 11649729 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. From informed consent to patient choice: a new protected interest. Shultz MM Yale Law J; 1985 Dec; 95(2):219-99. PubMed ID: 11658859 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Medical decision-making: patient participation. Wolfgarten A; Khan A Med Leg J; 1984; 52(Pt. 3):180-90. PubMed ID: 11649586 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Consent forms--forms without substance? A case for model disclosure and consent forms. Bronitt S; Faunce T Health Care Anal; 1996 Nov; 4(4):342-52. PubMed ID: 10164007 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Collaborative physician-patient planning and professional liability: opening the legal door to unconventional medicine. Green JA Adv Mind Body Med; 1999; 15(2):83-94. PubMed ID: 10367490 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Consent to medical procedures: paternalism, self-determination or therapeutic alliance? Teff H Law Q Rev; 1985 Jul; 101():432-53. PubMed ID: 11658726 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Vindicating the patient's rights: a comparative perspective. Giesen D J Contemp Health Law Policy; 1993; 9():273-309. PubMed ID: 10126941 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. The power of words. Blumenreich GA AANA J; 2004 Aug; 72(4):253-7. PubMed ID: 15354913 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Medical models and legal categories: an English perspective. Teff H J Contemp Health Law Policy; 1993; 9():211-32. PubMed ID: 10126939 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The legal meaning of consent in unequal power relationships. Kjervik DK; Grove SJ J Prof Nurs; 1988; 4(3):192-204. PubMed ID: 3417951 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. The way things should go. Avery JK Tenn Med; 2004 Oct; 97(10):440-1. PubMed ID: 15536967 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Why the British courts rejected the American doctrine of informed consent (and what British physicians should do about it). Annas GJ Am J Public Health; 1984 Nov; 74(11):1286-8. PubMed ID: 6496827 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The radiologist and informed consent: a review, comments and proposals. Johnson BA; James AE Curr Probl Diagn Radiol; 1979; 8(6):1-19. PubMed ID: 548233 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Informed consent: not just for procedures anymore. Feld AD Am J Gastroenterol; 2004 Jun; 99(6):977-80. PubMed ID: 15180712 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Avoiding malpractice claims for lack of informed consent. Hirsh BD Med Staff Couns; 1992; 6(3):57-65. PubMed ID: 10119379 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]