161 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32916797)
1. The Toothbrush Microbiome: Impact of User Age, Period of Use and Bristle Material on the Microbial Communities of Toothbrushes.
Zinn MK; Schages L; Bockmühl D
Microorganisms; 2020 Sep; 8(9):. PubMed ID: 32916797
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Effectiveness of Different Bristle Designs of Toothbrushes and Periodontal Status among Fixed Orthodontic Patients: A Double-blind Crossover Design.
Naik SP; Punathil S; Shetty P; Jayanti I; Jalaluddin M; Avijeeta A
J Contemp Dent Pract; 2018 Feb; 19(2):150-155. PubMed ID: 29422463
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparison of the antimicrobial properties of charcoal-infused and non-charcoal-infused toothbrushes: an in vitro study.
Daniel RA; Veena HR; Chaitra KR; Shubha P
Gen Dent; 2020; 68(5):51-55. PubMed ID: 32857049
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Assessment of microbial contamination of toothbrush head: an in vitro study.
Karibasappa GN; Nagesh L; Sujatha BK
Indian J Dent Res; 2011; 22(1):2-5. PubMed ID: 21525668
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. [Effect of different kinds of toothbrushes on toothbrushing pressure and plaque removal in the scrubbing method of toothbrushing (5). Toothbrushes with nylon bristles arranged in different lengths along the toothbrush shank and with different types of toothbrush bristle tip].
Fukushima M; Kurihara K; Kurogome J; Inadama K; Yageta A; Shoji Y; Suzuki J; Watanabe I; Shiono M; Watanabe T
Nihon Shishubyo Gakkai Kaishi; 1989 Dec; 31(4):1197-206. PubMed ID: 2489554
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparison of Bacterial Contamination and Antibacterial Efficacy in Bristles of Charcoal Toothbrushes versus Noncharcoal Toothbrushes: A Microbiological Study.
Thamke MV; Beldar A; Thakkar P; Murkute S; Ranmare V; Hudwekar A
Contemp Clin Dent; 2018; 9(3):463-467. PubMed ID: 30166845
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Evaluation of the bristle end-rounding patterns of children's toothbrushes using scanning electron microscopy and stereomicroscopy.
Lee HS; Jung HI; Kang SM; Kim HE; Kim BI
Int J Dent Hyg; 2017 May; 15(2):120-127. PubMed ID: 26376737
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Microbial contamination of toothbrushes with different principles of filament anchoring.
Wetzel WE; Schaumburg C; Ansari F; Kroeger T; Sziegoleit A
J Am Dent Assoc; 2005 Jun; 136(6):758-65; quiz 806. PubMed ID: 16022040
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Influence of different toothpaste abrasives on the bristle end-rounding quality of toothbrushes.
de Oliveira GJ; de Aveiro JM; Pavone C; Marcantonio RA
Int J Dent Hyg; 2015 Feb; 13(1):18-24. PubMed ID: 24661364
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Toothbrush microbiomes feature a meeting ground for human oral and environmental microbiota.
Blaustein RA; Michelitsch LM; Glawe AJ; Lee H; Huttelmaier S; Hellgeth N; Ben Maamar S; Hartmann EM
Microbiome; 2021 Jan; 9(1):32. PubMed ID: 33517907
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Measurement of bristle splaying of toothbrushes using digital imaging and evaluation of plaque removal efficacy over 3 months: A randomized controlled trial (RCT).
Kaneyasu Y; Shigeishi H; Maehara T; Fukada-Sambuichi E; Amano H; Sugiyama M
Int J Dent Hyg; 2020 May; 18(2):173-181. PubMed ID: 31868311
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. An electron microscopic comparison of bristle end-rounding of three commercial toothbrushes.
Rawls HR; Smith NK; Lentz DL; Cobb GW; Bailey MS
J Clin Dent; 1993; 4(3):96-100. PubMed ID: 8003240
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Toothbrush wear in relation to toothbrushing effectiveness.
Van Leeuwen MPC; Van der Weijden FA; Slot DE; Rosema MAM
Int J Dent Hyg; 2019 Feb; 17(1):77-84. PubMed ID: 30326176
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Effect of a clamp on toothbrush bristle deterioration.
Schneider P; Musselman R; Sarkar NK
J Clin Dent; 1995; 6(4):198-201. PubMed ID: 8624232
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparative efficacy of two battery-powered toothbrushes on dental plaque removal.
Ruhlman CD; Bartizek RD; Biesbrock AR
J Clin Dent; 2002; 13(3):95-9. PubMed ID: 11887517
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Toothbrush bristle wear and adherence of Streptococcus mutans.
Goldsmith RN; Shey Z; Houpt MI; Fine D; Schreiner H; Greenberg B
Pediatr Dent; 2007; 29(3):243-7. PubMed ID: 17688023
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Assessment of Microbial Contamination of a Toothbrush Head with and without a Protective Cover: An
Manohar R; Venkatesan K; Raja S; Ganesh A; Kanakasabapathy BS
Int J Clin Pediatr Dent; 2022; 15(4):455-457. PubMed ID: 36875982
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Interproximal access efficacy of three manual toothbrushes with extended, x-angled or flat multitufted bristles.
Stiller S; Bosma ML; Shi X; Spirgel CM; Yankell SL
Int J Dent Hyg; 2010 Aug; 8(3):244-8. PubMed ID: 20624196
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The efficacy of chlorhexidine spray vs mouthwash in the microbial contamination of child toothbrushes.
Ayşegül O; Elgin IE; Gulcin A; Nedim S
J Dent Child (Chic); 2007; 74(3):177-81. PubMed ID: 18482510
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. An In-vitro Assessment of the Physical and Chemical Properties of Toothbrush Bristle Following Decontamination by Three Different Methods: A Pilot Study.
Sabarish R; Chaparala SR; Yelisetty PP; Sk B; Lavu V; Mohan M
Cureus; 2019 Jun; 11(6):e4992. PubMed ID: 31497423
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
