These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

110 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3291706)

  • 1. Relationships between in vitro genetic toxicity and carcinogenicity studies in animals.
    Tennant RW
    Ann N Y Acad Sci; 1988; 534():127-32. PubMed ID: 3291706
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Evaluation of the ability of a battery of three in vitro genotoxicity tests to discriminate rodent carcinogens and non-carcinogens II. Further analysis of mammalian cell results, relative predictivity and tumour profiles.
    Kirkland D; Aardema M; Müller L; Makoto H
    Mutat Res; 2006 Sep; 608(1):29-42. PubMed ID: 16769241
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparison of multiple parameters of rodent carcinogenicity and in vitro genetic toxicity.
    Tennant RW; Stasiewicz S; Spalding JW
    Environ Mutagen; 1986; 8(2):205-27. PubMed ID: 3698943
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. How to reduce false positive results when undertaking in vitro genotoxicity testing and thus avoid unnecessary follow-up animal tests: Report of an ECVAM Workshop.
    Kirkland D; Pfuhler S; Tweats D; Aardema M; Corvi R; Darroudi F; Elhajouji A; Glatt H; Hastwell P; Hayashi M; Kasper P; Kirchner S; Lynch A; Marzin D; Maurici D; Meunier JR; Müller L; Nohynek G; Parry J; Parry E; Thybaud V; Tice R; van Benthem J; Vanparys P; White P
    Mutat Res; 2007 Mar; 628(1):31-55. PubMed ID: 17293159
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Evaluation of the ability of a battery of three in vitro genotoxicity tests to discriminate rodent carcinogens and non-carcinogens I. Sensitivity, specificity and relative predictivity.
    Kirkland D; Aardema M; Henderson L; Müller L
    Mutat Res; 2005 Jul; 584(1-2):1-256. PubMed ID: 15979392
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Transformation of BALB/c-3T3 cells: V. Transformation responses of 168 chemicals compared with mutagenicity in Salmonella and carcinogenicity in rodent bioassays.
    Matthews EJ; Spalding JW; Tennant RW
    Environ Health Perspect; 1993 Jul; 101 Suppl 2(Suppl 2):347-482. PubMed ID: 8243403
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Genetic toxicology: can we design predictive in vivo assays?
    Clive D
    Mutat Res; 1988; 205(1-4):313-30. PubMed ID: 3285193
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparative evaluation of genetic toxicity patterns of carcinogens and noncarcinogens: strategies for predictive use of short-term assays.
    Tennant RW; Spalding JW; Stasiewicz S; Caspary WD; Mason JM; Resnick MA
    Environ Health Perspect; 1987 Nov; 75():87-95. PubMed ID: 3319571
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Identification of rodent carcinogens and noncarcinogens using genetic toxicity tests: premises, promises, and performance.
    Zeiger E
    Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 1998 Oct; 28(2):85-95. PubMed ID: 9927558
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Predictions for the outcome of rodent carcinogenicity bioassays: identification of trans-species carcinogens and noncarcinogens.
    Tennant RW; Spalding J
    Environ Health Perspect; 1996 Oct; 104 Suppl 5(Suppl 5):1095-100. PubMed ID: 8933059
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Which rules for assembling short-term test batteries to predict carcinogenicity?
    Benigni R; Giuliani A
    Mol Toxicol; 1987; 1(2-3):143-66. PubMed ID: 3449755
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The prospects for a simplified and internationally harmonized approach to the detection of possible human carcinogens and mutagens.
    Ashby J
    Mutagenesis; 1986 Jan; 1(1):3-16. PubMed ID: 3325732
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The results of assays in Drosophila as indicators of exposure to carcinogens.
    Vogel EW; Graf U; Frei HJ; Nivard MM
    IARC Sci Publ; 1999; (146):427-70. PubMed ID: 10353398
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Chemicals showing no evidence of carcinogenicity in long-term, two-species rodent studies: the need for short-term test data.
    Shelby MD; Stasiewicz S
    Environ Mutagen; 1984; 6(6):871-8. PubMed ID: 6499792
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. An analysis of genetic toxicity, reproductive and developmental toxicity, and carcinogenicity data: I. Identification of carcinogens using surrogate endpoints.
    Matthews EJ; Kruhlak NL; Cimino MC; Benz RD; Contrera JF
    Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2006 Mar; 44(2):83-96. PubMed ID: 16386343
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The predictivity of animal bioassays and short-term genotoxicity tests for carcinogenicity and non-carcinogenicity to humans.
    Ennever FK; Noonan TJ; Rosenkranz HS
    Mutagenesis; 1987 Mar; 2(2):73-8. PubMed ID: 3331705
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Evolution of testing strategies for genetic toxicity.
    Brusick D
    Mutat Res; 1988; 205(1-4):69-78. PubMed ID: 3285199
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Testing strategies in mutagenicity and genetic toxicology: an appraisal of the guidelines of the European Scientific Committee for Cosmetics and Non-Food Products for the evaluation of hair dyes.
    Kirkland DJ; Henderson L; Marzin D; Müller L; Parry JM; Speit G; Tweats DJ; Williams GM
    Mutat Res; 2005 Dec; 588(2):88-105. PubMed ID: 16326131
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Prediction of rodent carcinogenicity utilizing a battery of in vitro and in vivo genotoxicity tests.
    Kim BS; Margolin BH
    Environ Mol Mutagen; 1999; 34(4):297-304. PubMed ID: 10618179
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. In vitro testing for carcinogens and mutagens.
    Santella RM
    Occup Med; 1987; 2(1):39-46. PubMed ID: 3306977
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.