These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

193 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32917215)

  • 61. Impact of pulmonary vein anatomy and left atrial size on postoperative atrial fibrillation after esophagectomy for esophageal cancer.
    Kashiwagi M; Ojima T; Hayata K; Kitadani J; Takeuchi A; Kuroi A; Higashimoto N; Taniguchi M; Tanimoto T; Kitabata H; Tanaka A
    Esophagus; 2023 Oct; 20(4):626-634. PubMed ID: 37347342
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 62. [Effects of minimally invasive versus open esophagectomy on circulating tumor cells in patients with esophageal cancer].
    Guo X; Wu YZ; Jia LF; Li YL; Yan YS; Chen QQ
    Nan Fang Yi Ke Da Xue Xue Bao; 2018 Mar; 38(3):318-323. PubMed ID: 29643038
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 63. Outcomes With Open and Minimally Invasive Ivor Lewis Esophagectomy After Neoadjuvant Therapy.
    Tapias LF; Mathisen DJ; Wright CD; Wain JC; Gaissert HA; Muniappan A; Lanuti M; Donahue DM; Morse CR
    Ann Thorac Surg; 2016 Mar; 101(3):1097-103. PubMed ID: 26652140
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 64. Outcomes, quality of life, and survival after esophagectomy for squamous cell carcinoma: A propensity score-matched comparison of operative approaches.
    Wang H; Shen Y; Feng M; Zhang Y; Jiang W; Xu S; Tan L; Wang Q
    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2015 Apr; 149(4):1006-14; discussion 1014- 5.e4. PubMed ID: 25752374
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 65. Short-term outcomes following open versus minimally invasive esophagectomy for cancer in England: a population-based national study.
    Mamidanna R; Bottle A; Aylin P; Faiz O; Hanna GB
    Ann Surg; 2012 Feb; 255(2):197-203. PubMed ID: 22173202
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 66. A Propensity Score Matched Analysis of Open Versus Minimally Invasive Transthoracic Esophagectomy in the Netherlands.
    Seesing MFJ; Gisbertz SS; Goense L; van Hillegersberg R; Kroon HM; Lagarde SM; Ruurda JP; Slaman AE; van Berge Henegouwen MI; Wijnhoven BPL
    Ann Surg; 2017 Nov; 266(5):839-846. PubMed ID: 28796016
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 67. Anastomosis in minimally invasive Ivor Lewis esophagectomy via two ports provides equivalent perioperative outcomes to open.
    Zhao Y; Jiao W; Zhao J; Wang X; Luo Y; Wang Y
    Indian J Cancer; 2015 Feb; 51 Suppl 2():e25-8. PubMed ID: 25712837
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 68. Total minimally invasive esophagectomy for esophageal adenocarcinoma reduces postoperative pain and pneumonia compared to hybrid esophagectomy.
    Berlth F; Plum PS; Chon SH; Gutschow CA; Bollschweiler E; Hölscher AH
    Surg Endosc; 2018 Dec; 32(12):4957-4965. PubMed ID: 29931451
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 69. Open versus minimally invasive esophagectomy: a single-center case controlled study.
    Schoppmann SF; Prager G; Langer FB; Riegler FM; Kabon B; Fleischmann E; Zacherl J
    Surg Endosc; 2010 Dec; 24(12):3044-53. PubMed ID: 20464423
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 70. Comparison of perioperative outcomes following open versus minimally invasive Ivor Lewis oesophagectomy at a single, high-volume centre.
    Sihag S; Wright CD; Wain JC; Gaissert HA; Lanuti M; Allan JS; Mathisen DJ; Morse CR
    Eur J Cardiothorac Surg; 2012 Sep; 42(3):430-7. PubMed ID: 22345284
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 71. Factors associated with access and approach to esophagectomy for cancer: a National Cancer Database study.
    Blears E; Fernando HC; Shahoud J; Weksler B
    Surg Endosc; 2022 Sep; 36(9):7016-7024. PubMed ID: 35059836
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 72. Postoperative short-term outcomes of minimally invasive versus open esophagectomy for patients with esophageal cancer: An updated systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Akhtar NM; Chen D; Zhao Y; Dane D; Xue Y; Wang W; Zhang J; Sang Y; Chen C; Chen Y
    Thorac Cancer; 2020 Jun; 11(6):1465-1475. PubMed ID: 32310341
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 73. The influence of minimally invasive esophagectomy versus open esophagectomy on postoperative pulmonary function in esophageal cancer patients: a meta-analysis.
    Su J; Li S; Sui Q; Wang G
    J Cardiothorac Surg; 2022 Jun; 17(1):139. PubMed ID: 35655256
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 74. [Clinical observation on perioperative complications of minimally invasive Ivor-Lewis and minimally invasive McKeown esophagectomy].
    Zhou JM; Jing SJ; Lu QT; Chu X; Xue T
    Zhonghua Zhong Liu Za Zhi; 2022 Jun; 44(6):577-580. PubMed ID: 35754233
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 75. Minimally invasive versus open esophagectomy for patients with esophageal cancer.
    Zingg U; McQuinn A; DiValentino D; Esterman AJ; Bessell JR; Thompson SK; Jamieson GG; Watson DI
    Ann Thorac Surg; 2009 Mar; 87(3):911-9. PubMed ID: 19231418
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 76. Minimally invasive esophagectomy performed with the patient in a prone position: a systematic review.
    Koyanagi K; Ozawa S; Tachimori Y
    Surg Today; 2016 Mar; 46(3):275-84. PubMed ID: 25860592
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 77. Minimally invasive esophagectomy provides significant survival advantage compared with open or hybrid esophagectomy for patients with cancers of the esophagus and gastroesophageal junction.
    Palazzo F; Rosato EL; Chaudhary A; Evans NR; Sendecki JA; Keith S; Chojnacki KA; Yeo CJ; Berger AC
    J Am Coll Surg; 2015 Apr; 220(4):672-9. PubMed ID: 25667145
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 78. Minimally Invasive or Open Esophagectomy for Treatment of Resectable Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma? Answer From a Real-world Multicenter Study.
    Liu F; Yang W; Yang W; Xu R; Chen L; He Y; Liu Z; Zhou F; Hou B; Zhang L; Zhang L; Zhang F; Cai F; Xu H; Lin M; Liu M; Pan Y; Liu Y; Hu Z; Chen H; He Z; Ke Y
    Ann Surg; 2023 Apr; 277(4):e777-e784. PubMed ID: 35129490
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 79. Comparison of complications and long-term survival after minimally invasive esophagectomy versus open esophagectomy in patients with esophageal cancer and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.
    Rong Y; Hao Y; Xue J; Li X; Li Q; Wang L; Li T
    Front Oncol; 2022; 12():934950. PubMed ID: 36267968
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 80. Short-term outcomes of robot-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy with extended lymphadenectomy for esophageal cancer compared with video-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy: A single-center retrospective study.
    Morimoto Y; Kawakubo H; Ishikawa A; Matsuda S; Hijikata N; Ando M; Mayanagi S; Irino T; Nakamura R; Wada N; Tsuji T; Kitagawa Y
    Asian J Endosc Surg; 2022 Apr; 15(2):270-278. PubMed ID: 34637190
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.