These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

113 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32917693)

  • 41. Numerical approach for unstructured quantum key distribution.
    Coles PJ; Metodiev EM; Lütkenhaus N
    Nat Commun; 2016 May; 7():11712. PubMed ID: 27198739
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Plug-and-play round-robin differential phase-shift quantum key distribution.
    Mao QP; Wang L; Zhao SM
    Sci Rep; 2017 Nov; 7(1):15435. PubMed ID: 29133835
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Side-channel-free quantum key distribution.
    Braunstein SL; Pirandola S
    Phys Rev Lett; 2012 Mar; 108(13):130502. PubMed ID: 22540685
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Upper Security Bounds for Coherent-One-Way Quantum Key Distribution.
    González-Payo J; Trényi R; Wang W; Curty M
    Phys Rev Lett; 2020 Dec; 125(26):260510. PubMed ID: 33449754
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Measurement-Device-Independent Quantum Key Distribution Over a 404 km Optical Fiber.
    Yin HL; Chen TY; Yu ZW; Liu H; You LX; Zhou YH; Chen SJ; Mao Y; Huang MQ; Zhang WJ; Chen H; Li MJ; Nolan D; Zhou F; Jiang X; Wang Z; Zhang Q; Wang XB; Pan JW
    Phys Rev Lett; 2016 Nov; 117(19):190501. PubMed ID: 27858431
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Proof-of-principle demonstration of parametric down-conversion source-based quantum key distribution over 40 dB channel loss.
    Zhang CH; Wang D; Zhou XY; Wang S; Zhang LB; Yin ZQ; Chen W; Han ZF; Guo GC; Wang Q
    Opt Express; 2018 Oct; 26(20):25921-25933. PubMed ID: 30469686
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. An integrated space-to-ground quantum communication network over 4,600 kilometres.
    Chen YA; Zhang Q; Chen TY; Cai WQ; Liao SK; Zhang J; Chen K; Yin J; Ren JG; Chen Z; Han SL; Yu Q; Liang K; Zhou F; Yuan X; Zhao MS; Wang TY; Jiang X; Zhang L; Liu WY; Li Y; Shen Q; Cao Y; Lu CY; Shu R; Wang JY; Li L; Liu NL; Xu F; Wang XB; Peng CZ; Pan JW
    Nature; 2021 Jan; 589(7841):214-219. PubMed ID: 33408416
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Simple security proof of coherent-one-way quantum key distribution.
    Gao RQ; Xie YM; Gu J; Liu WB; Weng CX; Li BH; Yin HL; Chen ZB
    Opt Express; 2022 Jun; 30(13):23783-23795. PubMed ID: 36225053
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Interference between independent photonic integrated devices for quantum key distribution.
    Semenenko H; Sibson P; Thompson MG; Erven C
    Opt Lett; 2019 Jan; 44(2):275-278. PubMed ID: 30644879
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Entanglement-based secure quantum cryptography over 1,120 kilometres.
    Yin J; Li YH; Liao SK; Yang M; Cao Y; Zhang L; Ren JG; Cai WQ; Liu WY; Li SL; Shu R; Huang YM; Deng L; Li L; Zhang Q; Liu NL; Chen YA; Lu CY; Wang XB; Xu F; Wang JY; Peng CZ; Ekert AK; Pan JW
    Nature; 2020 Jun; 582(7813):501-505. PubMed ID: 32541968
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Optically injected intensity-stable pulse source for secure quantum key distribution.
    Xie HB; Li Y; Jiang C; Cai WQ; Yin J; Ren JG; Wang XB; Liao SK; Peng CZ
    Opt Express; 2019 Apr; 27(9):12231-12240. PubMed ID: 31052767
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Feasible attack on detector-device-independent quantum key distribution.
    Wei K; Liu H; Ma H; Yang X; Zhang Y; Sun Y; Xiao J; Ji Y
    Sci Rep; 2017 Mar; 7(1):449. PubMed ID: 28348408
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Multi-path-based quasi-real-time key provisioning in quantum-key-distribution enabled optical networks (QKD-ON).
    Yu X; Liu X; Liu Y; Nag A; Zou X; Zhao Y; Zhang J
    Opt Express; 2021 Jul; 29(14):21225-21239. PubMed ID: 34265913
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Full-field implementation of a perfect eavesdropper on a quantum cryptography system.
    Gerhardt I; Liu Q; Lamas-Linares A; Skaar J; Kurtsiefer C; Makarov V
    Nat Commun; 2011 Jun; 2():349. PubMed ID: 21673670
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Finite-key security analyses on passive decoy-state QKD protocols with different unstable sources.
    Song TT; Qin SJ; Wen QY; Wang YK; Jia HY
    Sci Rep; 2015 Oct; 5():15276. PubMed ID: 26471947
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Authentication of variable length messages in quantum key distribution.
    Bibak K; Kapron BM; Srinivasan V
    EPJ Quantum Technol; 2022; 9(1):8. PubMed ID: 35224512
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Practical passive decoy state measurement-device-independent quantum key distribution with unstable sources.
    Liu L; Guo FZ; Wen QY
    Sci Rep; 2017 Sep; 7(1):11370. PubMed ID: 28900106
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Experimental composable security decoy-state quantum key distribution using time-phase encoding.
    Yin HL; Liu P; Dai WW; Ci ZH; Gu J; Gao T; Wang QW; Shen ZY
    Opt Express; 2020 Sep; 28(20):29479-29485. PubMed ID: 33114847
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Sending-or-Not-Sending Twin-Field Quantum Key Distribution with a Passive Decoy-State Method.
    Xue K; Shen Z; Zhao S; Mao Q
    Entropy (Basel); 2022 May; 24(5):. PubMed ID: 35626547
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Experimental underwater quantum key distribution.
    Feng Z; Li S; Xu Z
    Opt Express; 2021 Mar; 29(6):8725-8736. PubMed ID: 33820314
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.