172 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32919058)
1. Inter-Subject Variability of Skull Conductivity and Thickness in Calibrated Realistic Head Models.
Antonakakis M; Schrader S; Aydin Ü; Khan A; Gross J; Zervakis M; Rampp S; Wolters CH
Neuroimage; 2020 Dec; 223():117353. PubMed ID: 32919058
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The effect of stimulation type, head modeling, and combined EEG and MEG on the source reconstruction of the somatosensory P20/N20 component.
Antonakakis M; Schrader S; Wollbrink A; Oostenveld R; Rampp S; Haueisen J; Wolters CH
Hum Brain Mapp; 2019 Dec; 40(17):5011-5028. PubMed ID: 31397966
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A novel method for calibrating head models to account for variability in conductivity and its evaluation in a sphere model.
Schrader S; Antonakakis M; Rampp S; Engwer C; Wolters CH
Phys Med Biol; 2020 Dec; 65(24):245043. PubMed ID: 33113524
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Individually optimized multi-channel tDCS for targeting somatosensory cortex.
Khan A; Antonakakis M; Vogenauer N; Haueisen J; Wolters CH
Clin Neurophysiol; 2022 Feb; 134():9-26. PubMed ID: 34923283
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Improved EEG source analysis using low-resolution conductivity estimation in a four-compartment finite element head model.
Lew S; Wolters CH; Anwander A; Makeig S; MacLeod RS
Hum Brain Mapp; 2009 Sep; 30(9):2862-78. PubMed ID: 19117275
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Combining EEG and MEG for the reconstruction of epileptic activity using a calibrated realistic volume conductor model.
Aydin Ü; Vorwerk J; Küpper P; Heers M; Kugel H; Galka A; Hamid L; Wellmer J; Kellinghaus C; Rampp S; Wolters CH
PLoS One; 2014; 9(3):e93154. PubMed ID: 24671208
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Can individually targeted and optimized multi-channel tDCS outperform standard bipolar tDCS in stimulating the primary somatosensory cortex?
Khan A; Antonakakis M; Suntrup-Krueger S; Lencer R; Nitsche MA; Paulus W; Groß J; Wolters CH
Brain Stimul; 2023; 16(1):1-16. PubMed ID: 36526154
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Simultaneous head tissue conductivity and EEG source location estimation.
Akalin Acar Z; Acar CE; Makeig S
Neuroimage; 2016 Jan; 124(Pt A):168-180. PubMed ID: 26302675
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Determination of head conductivity frequency response in vivo with optimized EIT-EEG.
Dabek J; Kalogianni K; Rotgans E; van der Helm FCT; Kwakkel G; van Wegen EEH; Daffertshofer A; de Munck JC
Neuroimage; 2016 Feb; 127():484-495. PubMed ID: 26589336
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Impact of skull-to-brain conductivity ratio for high resolution EEG source localization.
Demoulin G; Pruvost-Robieux E; Marchi A; Ramdani C; Badier JM; Bartolomei F; Gavaret M
Biomed Phys Eng Express; 2021 Aug; 7(5):. PubMed ID: 34298528
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Neonatal EEG at scalp is focal and implies high skull conductivity in realistic neonatal head models.
Odabaee M; Tokariev A; Layeghy S; Mesbah M; Colditz PB; Ramon C; Vanhatalo S
Neuroimage; 2014 Aug; 96():73-80. PubMed ID: 24736169
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Minimum-norm cortical source estimation in layered head models is robust against skull conductivity error.
Stenroos M; Hauk O
Neuroimage; 2013 Nov; 81():265-272. PubMed ID: 23639259
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Evaluation of the distortion of EEG signals caused by a hole in the skull mimicking the fontanel in the skull of human neonates.
Flemming L; Wang Y; Caprihan A; Eiselt M; Haueisen J; Okada Y
Clin Neurophysiol; 2005 May; 116(5):1141-52. PubMed ID: 15826855
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Effects of uncertainty in head tissue conductivity and complexity on EEG forward modeling in neonates.
Azizollahi H; Aarabi A; Wallois F
Hum Brain Mapp; 2016 Oct; 37(10):3604-22. PubMed ID: 27238749
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Influence of tissue conductivity anisotropy on EEG/MEG field and return current computation in a realistic head model: a simulation and visualization study using high-resolution finite element modeling.
Wolters CH; Anwander A; Tricoche X; Weinstein D; Koch MA; MacLeod RS
Neuroimage; 2006 Apr; 30(3):813-26. PubMed ID: 16364662
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Influence of skull conductivity perturbations on EEG dipole source analysis.
Chen F; Hallez H; Staelens S
Med Phys; 2010 Aug; 37(8):4475-84. PubMed ID: 20879606
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The influence of model parameters on the inverse solution based on MEGs and EEGs.
Peters MJ; De Munck JC
Acta Otolaryngol Suppl; 1991; 491():61-8; discussion 69. PubMed ID: 1814156
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Effects of local variations in skull and scalp thickness on EEG's and MEG's.
Cuffin BN
IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 1993 Jan; 40(1):42-8. PubMed ID: 8468075
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Linear inverse source estimate of combined EEG and MEG data related to voluntary movements.
Babiloni F; Carducci F; Cincotti F; Del Gratta C; Pizzella V; Romani GL; Rossini PM; Tecchio F; Babiloni C
Hum Brain Mapp; 2001 Dec; 14(4):197-209. PubMed ID: 11668651
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Sensitivity of EEG and MEG measurements to tissue conductivity.
Gençer NG; Acar CE
Phys Med Biol; 2004 Mar; 49(5):701-17. PubMed ID: 15070197
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
