These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

146 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32920495)

  • 21. Solid waste management problems in secondary schools in Ibadan, Nigeria.
    Ana GR; Oloruntoba EO; Shendell D; Elemile OO; Benjamin OR; Sridhar MK
    J Environ Health; 2011 Sep; 74(2):24-8. PubMed ID: 21949981
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. An investigation into solid waste problem in the Egyptian construction industry: A mini-review.
    Daoud AO; Othman AAE; Robinson H; Bayyati A
    Waste Manag Res; 2020 Apr; 38(4):371-382. PubMed ID: 32043425
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Development and validation of a building design waste reduction model.
    Llatas C; Osmani M
    Waste Manag; 2016 Oct; 56():318-36. PubMed ID: 27292581
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Construction waste management based on industrial management models: a Swedish case study.
    Stenis J
    Waste Manag Res; 2005 Feb; 23(1):13-9. PubMed ID: 15751391
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Factors and values of willingness to pay for improved construction waste management--a perspective of Malaysian contractors.
    Begum RA; Siwar C; Pereira JJ; Jaafar AH
    Waste Manag; 2007; 27(12):1902-9. PubMed ID: 17110094
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Influence of construction and demolition waste management on the environmental impact of buildings.
    Coelho A; de Brito J
    Waste Manag; 2012 Mar; 32(3):532-41. PubMed ID: 22182407
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Investigating factors influencing construction waste management efforts in developing countries: an experience from Thailand.
    Manowong E
    Waste Manag Res; 2012 Jan; 30(1):56-71. PubMed ID: 21041415
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. A bi-level environmental impact assessment framework for comparing construction and demolition waste management strategies.
    Yazdanbakhsh A
    Waste Manag; 2018 Jul; 77():401-412. PubMed ID: 29709308
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Environmental and economic advantages of adopting reverse logistics for recycling construction and demolition waste: A case study of Brazilian construction and recycling companies.
    Oliveira Neto GC; Correia JM
    Waste Manag Res; 2019 Feb; 37(2):176-185. PubMed ID: 30632935
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Impact of Construction Waste Disposal Charging Scheme on work practices at construction sites in Hong Kong.
    Yu AT; Poon CS; Wong A; Yip R; Jaillon L
    Waste Manag; 2013 Jan; 33(1):138-46. PubMed ID: 23122205
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Estimation of construction waste generation and management in Thailand.
    Kofoworola OF; Gheewala SH
    Waste Manag; 2009 Feb; 29(2):731-8. PubMed ID: 18774703
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Pilot-based assessment of the economics of recycling construction demolition waste.
    Srour IM; Chehab GR; El-Fadel M; Tamraz S
    Waste Manag Res; 2013 Nov; 31(11):1170-9. PubMed ID: 23460542
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Evaluating environmental impacts of alternative construction waste management approaches using supply-chain-linked life-cycle analysis.
    Kucukvar M; Egilmez G; Tatari O
    Waste Manag Res; 2014 Jun; 32(6):500-8. PubMed ID: 24855225
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Clean construction and demolition waste material cycles through optimised pre-demolition waste audit documentation: A review on building material assessment tools.
    Rašković M; Ragossnig AM; Kondracki K; Ragossnig-Angst M
    Waste Manag Res; 2020 Sep; 38(9):923-941. PubMed ID: 32635832
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Sustainable construction: construction and demolition waste reconsidered.
    del Río Merino M; Izquierdo Gracia P; Weis Azevedo IS
    Waste Manag Res; 2010 Feb; 28(2):118-29. PubMed ID: 19723824
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Concrete and cement composites used for radioactive waste deposition.
    Koťátková J; Zatloukal J; Reiterman P; Kolář K
    J Environ Radioact; 2017 Nov; 178-179():147-155. PubMed ID: 28843164
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Survey dataset on architect׳s awareness and adoption of building envelope technologies for energy efficient housing in Lagos State.
    Akinola AO; Adeboye AB; Oluwatayo A; Alagbe O; Babalola O; Afolabi AO
    Data Brief; 2018 Aug; 19():1894-1901. PubMed ID: 30246085
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Ethical considerations for a better collaboration between architects and structural engineers: design of buildings with reinforced concrete frame systems in earthquake zones.
    Hurol Y
    Sci Eng Ethics; 2014 Jun; 20(2):597-612. PubMed ID: 23700122
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. A system dynamics-based environmental performance simulation of construction waste reduction management in China.
    Ding Z; Yi G; Tam VWY; Huang T
    Waste Manag; 2016 May; 51():130-141. PubMed ID: 26969286
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. On the prevailing construction waste recycling practices: a South East Queensland study.
    Tam VW; Kotrayothar D; Loo YC
    Waste Manag Res; 2009 Mar; 27(2):167-74. PubMed ID: 19244416
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.