These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

124 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3292081)

  • 1. A review on the methodology for assessing diagnostic tests.
    Linnet K
    Clin Chem; 1988 Jul; 34(7):1379-86. PubMed ID: 3292081
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Diagnostic test accuracy of nutritional tools used to identify undernutrition in patients with colorectal cancer: a systematic review.
    Håkonsen SJ; Pedersen PU; Bath-Hextall F; Kirkpatrick P
    JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep; 2015 May; 13(4):141-87. PubMed ID: 26447079
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The predictive power of diagnostic tests and the effect of prevalence of illness.
    Baldessarini RJ; Finklestein S; Arana GW
    Arch Gen Psychiatry; 1983 May; 40(5):569-73. PubMed ID: 6838334
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Understanding laboratory test results. Conditions for appropriate use of laboratory tests.
    Schwartz JS
    Med Clin North Am; 1987 Jul; 71(4):639-52. PubMed ID: 3295419
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Information provided by diagnostic and screening tests: improving probabilities.
    Weatherall M
    Postgrad Med J; 2018 Apr; 94(1110):230-235. PubMed ID: 29133377
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparing diagnostic tests on benefit-risk.
    Pennello G; Pantoja-Galicia N; Evans S
    J Biopharm Stat; 2016; 26(6):1083-1097. PubMed ID: 27548805
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Discordance rate, a new concept for combining diagnostic decisions with analytical performance characteristics. 1. Application in method or sample system comparisons and in defining decision limits.
    Haeckel R; Wosniok W; Puentmann I
    Clin Chem Lab Med; 2003 Mar; 41(3):347-55. PubMed ID: 12705345
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Value of information methods for assessing a new diagnostic test.
    Chen MH; Willan AR
    Stat Med; 2014 May; 33(11):1801-15. PubMed ID: 24403241
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Prevalence-value-accuracy plots: a new method for comparing diagnostic tests based on misclassification costs.
    Remaley AT; Sampson ML; DeLeo JM; Remaley NA; Farsi BD; Zweig MH
    Clin Chem; 1999 Jul; 45(7):934-41. PubMed ID: 10388467
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Dilution testing using rapid diagnostic tests in a HIV diagnostic algorithm: a novel alternative for confirmation testing in resource limited settings.
    Shanks L; Siddiqui MR; Abebe A; Piriou E; Pearce N; Ariti C; Masiga J; Muluneh L; Wazome J; Ritmeijer K; Klarkowski D
    Virol J; 2015 May; 12():75. PubMed ID: 25972188
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparing diagnostic tests: a simple graphic using likelihood ratios.
    Biggerstaff BJ
    Stat Med; 2000 Mar; 19(5):649-63. PubMed ID: 10700737
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Sampling studies in ambulatory quality assurance -- using the example of colonoscopy].
    Pfandzelter R; Walter A; Wegscheider K
    Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes; 2009; 103(3):159-64. PubMed ID: 19554891
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Predictive value and efficiency of hematology data.
    Galen RS
    Blood Cells; 1980; 6(2):185-97. PubMed ID: 6769520
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Roaming through methodology. XXXII. False test results].
    van der Weijden T; van den Akker M
    Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 2001 May; 145(19):906-8. PubMed ID: 11387865
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Tests for Helicobacter pylori infection: a critical appraisal from primary care.
    Roberts AP; Childs SM; Rubin G; de Wit NJ
    Fam Pract; 2000 Aug; 17 Suppl 2():S12-20. PubMed ID: 10960430
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Reprint of "Influence of analytical bias and imprecision on the number of false positive results using Guideline-Driven Medical Decision Limits".
    Hyltoft Petersen P; Klee GG
    Clin Chim Acta; 2014 May; 432():127-34. PubMed ID: 24747109
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Ruling out or ruling in disease with the most sensitive or specific diagnostic test: short cut or wrong turn?
    Boyko EJ
    Med Decis Making; 1994; 14(2):175-9. PubMed ID: 8028470
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Application of the predictive value model in the analysis of test effectiveness.
    Galen RS
    Clin Lab Med; 1982 Dec; 2(4):685-99. PubMed ID: 7160151
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Self-reported HIV-positive status but subsequent HIV-negative test result using rapid diagnostic testing algorithms among seven sub-Saharan African military populations.
    Harbertson J; Hale BR; Tran BR; Thomas AG; Grillo MP; Jacobs MB; McAnany J; Shaffer RA
    PLoS One; 2017; 12(7):e0180796. PubMed ID: 28686678
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The likelihood ratio. An improved measure for reporting and evaluating diagnostic test results.
    Radack KL; Rouan G; Hedges J
    Arch Pathol Lab Med; 1986 Aug; 110(8):689-93. PubMed ID: 3755325
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.