235 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32920968)
1. Operative and long-term oncological outcomes in patients undergoing robotic versus laparoscopic surgery for rectal cancer.
Bilgin IA; Bas M; Aytac E; Benlice C; Esen E; Kirbiyik E; Kiziltas C; Aghayeva A; Ozben V; Hamzaoglu I; Karahasanoglu T; Baca B
Int J Med Robot; 2020 Dec; 16(6):1-10. PubMed ID: 32920968
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparison of short-term and oncologic outcomes of robotic and laparoscopic resection for mid- and distal rectal cancer.
Law WL; Foo DCC
Surg Endosc; 2017 Jul; 31(7):2798-2807. PubMed ID: 27785627
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Robotic versus conventional laparoscopic rectal cancer surgery in obese patients.
Gorgun E; Ozben V; Costedio M; Stocchi L; Kalady M; Remzi F
Colorectal Dis; 2016 Nov; 18(11):1063-1071. PubMed ID: 27154266
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Robotic surgery for rectal cancer: current immediate clinical and oncological outcomes.
Araujo SE; Seid VE; Klajner S
World J Gastroenterol; 2014 Oct; 20(39):14359-70. PubMed ID: 25339823
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Robotic resection compared with laparoscopic rectal resection for cancer: systematic review and meta-analysis of short-term outcome.
Trastulli S; Farinella E; Cirocchi R; Cavaliere D; Avenia N; Sciannameo F; Gullà N; Noya G; Boselli C
Colorectal Dis; 2012 Apr; 14(4):e134-56. PubMed ID: 22151033
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Robotic versus laparoscopic intersphincteric resection for low rectal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Lee SH; Kim DH; Lim SW
Int J Colorectal Dis; 2018 Dec; 33(12):1741-1753. PubMed ID: 30187156
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Robotic rectal cancer surgery in obese patients may lead to better short-term outcomes when compared to laparoscopy: a comparative propensity scored match study.
Panteleimonitis S; Pickering O; Abbas H; Harper M; Kandala N; Figueiredo N; Qureshi T; Parvaiz A
Int J Colorectal Dis; 2018 Aug; 33(8):1079-1086. PubMed ID: 29577170
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Robotic Surgery for Rectal Cancer Provides Advantageous Outcomes Over Laparoscopic Approach: Results From a Large Retrospective Cohort.
Crippa J; Grass F; Dozois EJ; Mathis KL; Merchea A; Colibaseanu DT; Kelley SR; Larson DW
Ann Surg; 2021 Dec; 274(6):e1218-e1222. PubMed ID: 32068552
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Long-term oncologic outcomes of robotic low anterior resection for rectal cancer: a comparative study with laparoscopic surgery.
Park EJ; Cho MS; Baek SJ; Hur H; Min BS; Baik SH; Lee KY; Kim NK
Ann Surg; 2015 Jan; 261(1):129-37. PubMed ID: 24662411
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Robotic versus laparoscopic rectal resection for sphincter-saving surgery: pathological and short-term outcomes in a single-center analysis of 130 consecutive patients.
Valverde A; Goasguen N; Oberlin O; Svrcek M; Fléjou JF; Sezeur A; Mosnier H; Houdart R; Lupinacci RM
Surg Endosc; 2017 Oct; 31(10):4085-4091. PubMed ID: 28271268
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Simultaneous development of laparoscopy and robotics provides acceptable perioperative outcomes and shows robotics to have a faster learning curve and to be overall faster in rectal cancer surgery: analysis of novice MIS surgeon learning curves.
Melich G; Hong YK; Kim J; Hur H; Baik SH; Kim NK; Sender Liberman A; Min BS
Surg Endosc; 2015 Mar; 29(3):558-68. PubMed ID: 25030474
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. No beneficial effect on survival but a decrease in postoperative complications in patients with rectal cancer undergoing robotic surgery: a retrospective cohort study.
Lei X; Yang L; Huang Z; Shi H; Zhou Z; Tang C; Li T
BMC Surg; 2021 Sep; 21(1):355. PubMed ID: 34583670
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. [Comparative study of clinical outcomes of robot versus laparoscopic radical surgery for rectal cancer based on propensity score matching].
Ye SP; Shi J; Liu DN; Jiang QG; Lei X; Tang C; Qiu H; Li TY
Zhonghua Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2019 Jun; 57(6):447-451. PubMed ID: 31142070
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Robotic versus laparoscopic surgery for rectal cancer: a comparative study of clinical outcomes and costs.
Ielpo B; Duran H; Diaz E; Fabra I; Caruso R; Malavé L; Ferri V; Nuñez J; Ruiz-Ocaña A; Jorge E; Lazzaro S; Kalivaci D; Quijano Y; Vicente E
Int J Colorectal Dis; 2017 Oct; 32(10):1423-1429. PubMed ID: 28791457
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparison of clinical and economic outcomes between robotic, laparoscopic, and open rectal cancer surgery: early experience at a tertiary care center.
Ramji KM; Cleghorn MC; Josse JM; MacNeill A; O'Brien C; Urbach D; Quereshy FA
Surg Endosc; 2016 Apr; 30(4):1337-43. PubMed ID: 26173546
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The minimally invasive approach, laparoscopic and robotic, in rectal resection for cancer. A single center experience.
Popescu I; Vasilescu C; Tomulescu V; Vasile S; Sgarbura O
Acta Chir Iugosl; 2010; 57(3):29-35. PubMed ID: 21066980
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Robotic versus laparoscopic rectal resection: is there any real difference? A comparative single center study.
Ielpo B; Caruso R; Quijano Y; Duran H; Diaz E; Fabra I; Oliva C; Olivares S; Ferri V; Ceron R; Plaza C; Vicente E
Int J Med Robot; 2014 Sep; 10(3):300-5. PubMed ID: 24692203
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Operative and oncological outcomes after robotic rectal resection compared with laparoscopy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Flynn J; Larach JT; Kong JCH; Rahme J; Waters PS; Warrier SK; Heriot A
ANZ J Surg; 2023 Mar; 93(3):510-521. PubMed ID: 36214098
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Robotic-laparoscopic rectal cancer excision versus traditional laparoscopy.
Tam MS; Abbass M; Abbas MA
JSLS; 2014; 18(3):. PubMed ID: 25392653
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Robotic Versus Laparoscopic Surgery for Rectal Cancer after Preoperative Chemoradiotherapy: Case-Matched Study of Short-Term Outcomes.
Kim YS; Kim MJ; Park SC; Sohn DK; Kim DY; Chang HJ; Nam BH; Oh JH
Cancer Res Treat; 2016 Jan; 48(1):225-31. PubMed ID: 25779367
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
