135 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32921550)
1. Inter-rater reliability of four validated diabetic foot ulcer classification systems.
Camilleri A; Gatt A; Formosa C
J Tissue Viability; 2020 Nov; 29(4):284-290. PubMed ID: 32921550
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Interobserver Reliability of Three Validated Scoring Systems in the Assessment of Diabetic Foot Ulcers.
Forsythe RO; Ozdemir BA; Chemla ES; Jones KG; Hinchliffe RJ
Int J Low Extrem Wounds; 2016 Sep; 15(3):213-9. PubMed ID: 27358037
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparing the Meggitt-Wagner and the University of Texas wound classification systems for diabetic foot ulcers: inter-observer analyses.
Santema TB; Lenselink EA; Balm R; Ubbink DT
Int Wound J; 2016 Dec; 13(6):1137-1141. PubMed ID: 25720543
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Inter-observer agreement of the Wagner, University of Texas and PEDIS classification systems for the diabetic foot syndrome.
Bravo-Molina A; Linares-Palomino JP; Vera-Arroyo B; Salmerón-Febres LM; Ros-Díe E
Foot Ankle Surg; 2018 Feb; 24(1):60-64. PubMed ID: 29413776
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Classification systems for lower extremity amputation prediction in subjects with active diabetic foot ulcer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Monteiro-Soares M; Martins-Mendes D; Vaz-Carneiro A; Sampaio S; Dinis-Ribeiro M
Diabetes Metab Res Rev; 2014 Oct; 30(7):610-22. PubMed ID: 24523130
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Repeatability, Completion Time, and Predictive Ability of Four Diabetes-Related Foot Ulcer Classification Systems.
Alahakoon C; Fernando M; Galappaththy C; Lazzarini P; Moxon JV; Jones R; Golledge J
J Diabetes Sci Technol; 2023 Jan; 17(1):35-41. PubMed ID: 33451251
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Assessment of diabetic foot ulcers based on pictorial material: an interobserver study.
Jørgensen TS; Hellsten Y; Gottlieb H; Brorson S
J Wound Care; 2020 Nov; 29(11):658-663. PubMed ID: 33175625
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparison of four systems of classification of diabetic foot ulcers in Tanzania.
Abbas ZG; Lutale JK; Game FL; Jeffcoate WJ
Diabet Med; 2008 Feb; 25(2):134-7. PubMed ID: 18215177
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Inter-rater agreement and reliability of outcome measurement instruments and staging systems used in hidradenitis suppurativa.
Thorlacius L; Garg A; Riis PT; Nielsen SM; Bettoli V; Ingram JR; Del Marmol V; Matusiak L; Pascual JC; Revuz J; Sartorius K; Tzellos T; van der Zee HH; Zouboulis CC; Saunte DM; Gottlieb AB; Christensen R; Jemec GBE
Br J Dermatol; 2019 Sep; 181(3):483-491. PubMed ID: 30724351
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The SHID wound classification system for diabetic foot ulcer patients: a validity study.
Jais S; Pratama K; Fahrain J; Junaidi J; Kardiatun T; Kawuryan U
J Med Life; 2022 Oct; 15(10):1224-1228. PubMed ID: 36420292
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A new wound-based severity score for diabetic foot ulcers: A prospective analysis of 1,000 patients.
Beckert S; Witte M; Wicke C; Königsrainer A; Coerper S
Diabetes Care; 2006 May; 29(5):988-92. PubMed ID: 16644625
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Reliability and validity of the perfusion, extent, depth, infection and sensation (PEDIS) classification system and score in patients with diabetic foot ulcer.
Chuan F; Tang K; Jiang P; Zhou B; He X
PLoS One; 2015; 10(4):e0124739. PubMed ID: 25875097
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Guidelines on the classification of diabetic foot ulcers (IWGDF 2019).
Monteiro-Soares M; Russell D; Boyko EJ; Jeffcoate W; Mills JL; Morbach S; Game F;
Diabetes Metab Res Rev; 2020 Mar; 36 Suppl 1():e3273. PubMed ID: 32176445
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Classification of foot ulcers in people with diabetes: A systematic review.
Monteiro-Soares M; Hamilton EJ; Russell DA; Srisawasdi G; Boyko EJ; Mills JL; Jeffcoate W; Game F
Diabetes Metab Res Rev; 2024 Mar; 40(3):e3645. PubMed ID: 37132179
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Independent Observational Analysis of Ulcer Outcomes for SINBAD and University of Texas Ulcer Scoring Systems.
Leese GP; Soto-Pedre E; Schofield C
Diabetes Care; 2021 Feb; 44(2):326-331. PubMed ID: 33288650
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparison of three systems of classification in predicting the outcome of diabetic foot ulcers in a Brazilian population.
Parisi MC; Zantut-Wittmann DE; Pavin EJ; Machado H; Nery M; Jeffcoate WJ
Eur J Endocrinol; 2008 Oct; 159(4):417-22. PubMed ID: 18603574
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Evaluation of diabetic wound classifications and a new wound score.
Strauss MB; Aksenov IV
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2005 Oct; 439():79-86. PubMed ID: 16205143
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Diabetic foot ulcer classifications: A critical review.
Monteiro-Soares M; Boyko EJ; Jeffcoate W; Mills JL; Russell D; Morbach S; Game F
Diabetes Metab Res Rev; 2020 Mar; 36 Suppl 1():e3272. PubMed ID: 32176449
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Six of one, half a dozen of the other: A measure of multidisciplinary inter/intra-rater reliability of the society for fetal urology and urinary tract dilation grading systems for hydronephrosis.
Rickard M; Easterbrook B; Kim S; Farrokhyar F; Stein N; Arora S; Belostotsky V; DeMaria J; Lorenzo AJ; Braga LH
J Pediatr Urol; 2017 Feb; 13(1):80.e1-80.e5. PubMed ID: 27916387
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Reproducibility of physiological track-and-trigger warning systems for identifying at-risk patients on the ward.
Subbe CP; Gao H; Harrison DA
Intensive Care Med; 2007 Apr; 33(4):619-24. PubMed ID: 17235508
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
