120 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32923492)
1. Bayesian Inference of Finite Population Quantiles for Skewed Survey Data Using Skew-Normal Penalized Spline Regression.
Liu Y; Chen Q
J Surv Stat Methodol; 2020 Sep; 8(4):792-816. PubMed ID: 32923492
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Bayesian inference for finite population quantiles from unequal probability samples.
Chen Q; Elliott MR; Little RJA
Surv Methodol; 2012 Dec; 38(2):203-214. PubMed ID: 29200607
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Bayesian penalized spline model-based inference for finite population proportion in unequal probability sampling.
Chen Q; Elliott MR; Little RJA
Surv Methodol; 2010 Jun; 36(1):23-34. PubMed ID: 29200606
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Laplacian-P-splines for Bayesian inference in the mixture cure model.
Gressani O; Faes C; Hens N
Stat Med; 2022 Jun; 41(14):2602-2626. PubMed ID: 35699121
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Bayesian inference under cluster sampling with probability proportional to size.
Makela S; Si Y; Gelman A
Stat Med; 2018 Nov; 37(26):3849-3868. PubMed ID: 29974495
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A Bayesian Genomic Regression Model with Skew Normal Random Errors.
Pérez-Rodríguez P; Acosta-Pech R; Pérez-Elizalde S; Cruz CV; Espinosa JS; Crossa J
G3 (Bethesda); 2018 May; 8(5):1771-1785. PubMed ID: 29588381
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Penalized spline estimation for functional coefficient regression models.
Cao Y; Lin H; Wu TZ; Yu Y
Comput Stat Data Anal; 2010 Apr; 54(4):891-905. PubMed ID: 21516260
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Bayesian inference for finite mixtures of univariate and multivariate skew-normal and skew-t distributions.
Frühwirth-Schnatter S; Pyne S
Biostatistics; 2010 Apr; 11(2):317-36. PubMed ID: 20110247
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Bayesian inference for quantiles of the log-normal distribution.
Gardini A; Trivisano C; Fabrizi E
Biom J; 2020 Dec; 62(8):1997-2012. PubMed ID: 32696481
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Bayesian joint analysis of heterogeneous- and skewed-longitudinal data and a binary outcome, with application to AIDS clinical studies.
Lu X; Huang Y; Chen J; Zhou R; Yu S; Yin P
Stat Methods Med Res; 2018 Oct; 27(10):2946-2963. PubMed ID: 28132588
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Bayesian approach for sample size determination, illustrated with Soil Health Card data of Andhra Pradesh (India).
Brus DJ; Kempen B; Rossiter D; Balwinder-Singh ; McDonald AJ
Geoderma; 2022 Jan; 405():115396. PubMed ID: 34980929
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Bayesian inference for two-part mixed-effects model using skew distributions, with application to longitudinal semicontinuous alcohol data.
Xing D; Huang Y; Chen H; Zhu Y; Dagne GA; Baldwin J
Stat Methods Med Res; 2017 Aug; 26(4):1838-1853. PubMed ID: 26092477
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A two-step semiparametric method to accommodate sampling weights in multiple imputation.
Zhou H; Elliott MR; Raghunathan TE
Biometrics; 2016 Mar; 72(1):242-52. PubMed ID: 26393409
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Sensitivity analysis for high quantiles of ochratoxin A exposure distribution.
Albert I; Gauchi JP
Int J Food Microbiol; 2002 May; 75(1-2):143-55. PubMed ID: 11999111
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Bayesian inference on mixed-effects location scale models with skew-t distribution and mismeasured covariates for longitudinal data.
Lu T
Stat Med; 2017 Jul; 36(16):2614-2629. PubMed ID: 28421622
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Simultaneous confidence intervals for contrasts of quantiles.
Segbehoe LS; Schaarschmidt F; Djira GD
Biom J; 2022 Jan; 64(1):7-19. PubMed ID: 34499768
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Skew-normal antedependence models for skewed longitudinal data.
Chang SC; Zimmerman DL
Biometrika; 2016 Jun; 103(2):363-376. PubMed ID: 27279663
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Flexible Bayesian modelling in dichotomous item response theory using mixtures of skewed item curves.
Gonçalves FB; Venturelli S L J; Loschi RH
Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2023 Feb; 76(1):69-86. PubMed ID: 35788921
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Penalized estimation for proportional hazards models with current status data.
Lu M; Li CS
Stat Med; 2017 Dec; 36(30):4893-4907. PubMed ID: 28872695
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Bivariate zero-inflated regression for count data: a Bayesian approach with application to plant counts.
Majumdar A; Gries C
Int J Biostat; 2010; 6(1):Article 27. PubMed ID: 21969981
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
