These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

148 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32925150)

  • 21. Interactions between e-commerce users during the COVID-19 pandemic period: What came and what remained.
    Dos Santos EF; de Carvalho PVR; Gomes JO
    Work; 2022; 73(s1):S177-S187. PubMed ID: 36189516
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Online Store Aesthetics Impact Efficacy of Product Recommendations and Highlighting.
    Sulikowski P; Kucznerowicz M; Bąk I; Romanowski A; Zdziebko T
    Sensors (Basel); 2022 Nov; 22(23):. PubMed ID: 36501888
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Evaluating ecommerce websites cognitive efficiency: an integrative framework based on data envelopment analysis.
    Lo Storto C
    Appl Ergon; 2013 Nov; 44(6):1004-14. PubMed ID: 23697624
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. User Experience Theories, Models, and Frameworks: A Focused Review of the Healthcare Literature.
    Lesselroth B; Monkman H; Adams K; Wood S; Corbett A; Homco J; Borycki EM; Spier R; Kushniruk AW
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2020 Jun; 270():1076-1080. PubMed ID: 32570547
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Smartphone text input: Effects of experience and phrase complexity on user performance, physiological reaction, and perceived usability.
    Li Y; You F; You X; Ji M
    Appl Ergon; 2019 Oct; 80():200-208. PubMed ID: 31280806
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Kano-QFD-based analysis of the influence of user experience on the design of handicraft intangible cultural heritage apps.
    Li J; Kim K
    Herit Sci; 2023; 11(1):59. PubMed ID: 36974317
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. The negative impact of interface design, customizability, inefficiency, malfunctions, and information retrieval on user experience: A national usability survey of ICU clinical information systems in Finland.
    Jansson M; Liisanantti J; Ala-Kokko T; Reponen J
    Int J Med Inform; 2022 Mar; 159():104680. PubMed ID: 34990942
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. End-User Feedback on a Low-Cost Portable Air Quality Sensor System-Are We There Yet?
    Robinson JA; Kocman D; Horvat M; Bartonova A
    Sensors (Basel); 2018 Nov; 18(11):. PubMed ID: 30400374
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. User's demography and expectation regarding search, purchase and evaluation in mobile application store.
    Prata W; de Moraes A; Quaresma M
    Work; 2012; 41 Suppl 1():1124-31. PubMed ID: 22316870
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. An evaluation for VR glasses system user experience: The influence factors of interactive operation and motion sickness.
    Yu M; Zhou R; Wang H; Zhao W
    Appl Ergon; 2019 Jan; 74():206-213. PubMed ID: 30487101
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. A Training Smartphone Application for the Simulation of Outdoor Blind Pedestrian Navigation: Usability, UX Evaluation, Sentiment Analysis.
    Theodorou P; Tsiligkos K; Meliones A; Filios C
    Sensors (Basel); 2022 Dec; 23(1):. PubMed ID: 36616964
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Online shopping interface components: relative importance as peripheral and central cues.
    Warden CA; Wu WY; Tsai D
    Cyberpsychol Behav; 2006 Jun; 9(3):285-96. PubMed ID: 16780396
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. FriWalk robotic walker: usability, acceptance and UX evaluation after a pilot study in a real environment.
    Pérez-Rodríguez R; Moreno-Sánchez PA; Valdés-Aragonés M; Oviedo-Briones M; Divan S; García-Grossocordón N; Rodríguez-Mañas L
    Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol; 2020 Aug; 15(6):718-727. PubMed ID: 31172819
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. UX Framework Including Imbalanced UX Dataset Reduction Method for Analyzing Interaction Trends of Agent Systems.
    Gu B; Sung Y
    Sensors (Basel); 2023 Feb; 23(3):. PubMed ID: 36772707
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Applying Implicit Association Test Techniques and Facial Expression Analyses in the Comparative Evaluation of Website User Experience.
    Mauri M; Rancati G; Gaggioli A; Riva G
    Front Psychol; 2021; 12():674159. PubMed ID: 34712164
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. What users want in e-commerce design: effects of age, education and income.
    Lightner NJ
    Ergonomics; 2003 Jan; 46(1-3):153-68. PubMed ID: 12554404
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. User preferences and usability of iVitality: optimizing an innovative online research platform for home-based health monitoring.
    van Osch M; Rövekamp A; Bergman-Agteres SN; Wijsman LW; Ooms SJ; Mooijaart SP; Vermeulen J
    Patient Prefer Adherence; 2015; 9():857-67. PubMed ID: 26170635
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Innovation Through Universal Design in Agile UX Software Development Teams. A Collaborative Case Study of an Under Graduate AR Tourist Guide Project.
    Finn E; Kuusinen J
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2021 Jun; 282():252-258. PubMed ID: 34085973
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Enhancing Home Health Mobile Phone App Usability Through General Smartphone Training: Usability and Learnability Case Study.
    Harte R; Hall T; Glynn L; Rodríguez-Molinero A; Scharf T; Quinlan LR; ÓLaighin G
    JMIR Hum Factors; 2018 Apr; 5(2):e18. PubMed ID: 29699969
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Perceptions of Smartphone User-Centered Mobile Health Tracking Apps Across Various Chronic Illness Populations: An Integrative Review.
    Birkhoff SD; Smeltzer SC
    J Nurs Scholarsh; 2017 Jul; 49(4):371-378. PubMed ID: 28605151
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.