303 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32925159)
21. A comparison of reconstruction algorithms for C-arm mammography tomosynthesis.
Rakowski JT; Dennis MJ
Med Phys; 2006 Aug; 33(8):3018-32. PubMed ID: 16964880
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Improved digital chest tomosynthesis image quality by use of a projection-based dual-energy virtual monochromatic convolutional neural network with super resolution.
Gomi T; Hara H; Watanabe Y; Mizukami S
PLoS One; 2020; 15(12):e0244745. PubMed ID: 33382766
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. DIR-DBTnet: Deep iterative reconstruction network for three-dimensional digital breast tomosynthesis imaging.
Su T; Deng X; Yang J; Wang Z; Fang S; Zheng H; Liang D; Ge Y
Med Phys; 2021 May; 48(5):2289-2300. PubMed ID: 33594671
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Development of a chest digital tomosynthesis R/F system and implementation of low-dose GPU-accelerated compressed sensing (CS) image reconstruction.
Choi S; Lee H; Lee D; Choi S; Lee CL; Kwon W; Shin J; Seo CW; Kim HJ
Med Phys; 2018 May; 45(5):1871-1888. PubMed ID: 29500855
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Reduced anatomical clutter in digital breast tomosynthesis with statistical iterative reconstruction.
Garrett JW; Li Y; Li K; Chen GH
Med Phys; 2018 May; 45(5):2009-2022. PubMed ID: 29542821
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. The effect of a limited number of projections and reconstruction algorithms on the image quality of megavoltage digital tomosynthesis.
Sarkar V; Shi C; Rassiah-Szegedi P; Diaz A; Eng T; Papanikolaou N
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2009 May; 10(3):155-172. PubMed ID: 19692978
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. TU-E-217BCD-11: Evaluating the Performance of a Stationary Digital Breast Tomosynthesis System.
Tucker A; Gidcumb E; Shan J; Qian X; Sprenger F; Spronk D; Zhang Y; Kennedy D; Farbizio T; Ruth C; Jing Z; Lu J; Zhou O
Med Phys; 2012 Jun; 39(6Part24):3916. PubMed ID: 28518705
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Improved digital breast tomosynthesis images using automated ultrasound.
Zhang X; Yuan J; Du S; Kripfgans OD; Wang X; Carson PL; Liu X
Med Phys; 2014 Jun; 41(6):061911. PubMed ID: 24877822
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. A comparison of reconstruction algorithms for breast tomosynthesis.
Wu T; Moore RH; Rafferty EA; Kopans DB
Med Phys; 2004 Sep; 31(9):2636-47. PubMed ID: 15487747
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Image artifacts in digital breast tomosynthesis: investigation of the effects of system geometry and reconstruction parameters using a linear system approach.
Hu YH; Zhao B; Zhao W
Med Phys; 2008 Dec; 35(12):5242-52. PubMed ID: 19175083
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Comparison of a stationary digital breast tomosynthesis system to magnified 2D mammography using breast tissue specimens.
Tucker AW; Calliste J; Gidcumb EM; Wu J; Kuzmiak CM; Hyun N; Zeng D; Lu J; Zhou O; Lee YZ
Acad Radiol; 2014 Dec; 21(12):1547-52. PubMed ID: 25172412
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Implementation and evaluation of an expectation maximization reconstruction algorithm for gamma emission breast tomosynthesis.
Gong Z; Klanian K; Patel T; Sullivan O; Williams MB
Med Phys; 2012 Dec; 39(12):7580-92. PubMed ID: 23231306
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Detectability comparison of simulated tumors in digital breast tomosynthesis using high-energy X-ray inline phase sensitive and commercial imaging systems.
Ghani MU; Wong MD; Omoumi FH; Zheng B; Fajardo LL; Yan A; Wu X; Liu H
Phys Med; 2018 Mar; 47():34-41. PubMed ID: 29609816
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. The quantitative potential for breast tomosynthesis imaging.
Shafer CM; Samei E; Lo JY
Med Phys; 2010 Mar; 37(3):1004-16. PubMed ID: 20384236
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. A Case for Wide-Angle Breast Tomosynthesis.
Samei E; Thompson J; Richard S; Bowsher J
Acad Radiol; 2015 Jul; 22(7):860-9. PubMed ID: 25920335
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. In-plane image quality and NPWE detectability index in digital breast tomosynthesis.
Monnin P; Verdun FR; Bosmans H; Marshall NW
Phys Med Biol; 2020 May; 65(9):095013. PubMed ID: 32191923
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Total variation minimization filter for DBT imaging.
Mota AM; Matela N; Oliveira N; Almeida P
Med Phys; 2015 Jun; 42(6):2827-36. PubMed ID: 26127035
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Stationary chest tomosynthesis using a carbon nanotube x-ray source array: a feasibility study.
Shan J; Tucker AW; Lee YZ; Heath MD; Wang X; Foos DH; Lu J; Zhou O
Phys Med Biol; 2015 Jan; 60(1):81-100. PubMed ID: 25478786
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. [Influence of Image Reconstruction Method on Image Quality in Digital Breast Tomosynthesis].
Nishikawa M; Tominaga K; Ueno T; Yasukawa S; Hiroshige K; Mouri K; Kozawa Y; Uemura T; Fujimitsu R; Yoshimitsu K
Nihon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai Zasshi; 2021; 77(1):14-22. PubMed ID: 33473075
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Carbon nanotube electron field emitters for x-ray imaging of human breast cancer.
Gidcumb E; Gao B; Shan J; Inscoe C; Lu J; Zhou O
Nanotechnology; 2014 Jun; 25(24):245704. PubMed ID: 24869902
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
