These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

133 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32925242)

  • 1. CORR Insights®: Is the Survivorship of Birmingham Hip Resurfacing Better Than Selected Conventional Hip Arthroplasties in Men Younger Than 65 Years of Age? A Study from the Australian Orthopaedic Association National Joint Replacement Registry.
    Gjertsen JE
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2020 Nov; 478(11):2637-2639. PubMed ID: 32925242
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Letter to the Editor: Is the Survivorship of Birmingham Hip Resurfacing Better Than Selected Conventional Hip Arthroplasties in Men Younger Than 65 Years of Age? A Study from the Australian Orthopaedic Association National Joint Replacement Registry.
    Walter WL; Beaulé PE
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2021 Jun; 479(6):1404-1405. PubMed ID: 33729183
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Letter to the Editor: Is the Survivorship of Birmingham Hip Resurfacing Better Than Selected Conventional Hip Arthroplasties in Men Younger Than 65 Years of Age? A Study from the Australian Orthopaedic Association National Joint Replacement Registry.
    Girard J
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2021 Jul; 479(7):1632-1633. PubMed ID: 34038390
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Reply to the Letter to the Editor: Is the Survivorship of Birmingham Hip Resurfacing Better Than Selected Conventional Hip Arthroplasties in Men Younger Than 65 Years of Age? A Study from the Australian Orthopaedic Association National Joint Replacement Registry.
    Stoney J; Graves SE; de Steiger RN; Rainbird S; Kelly BMath TL; Hatton A
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2021 Sep; 479(9):2108-2109. PubMed ID: 34415704
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Five-year results of the ASR XL Acetabular System and the ASR Hip Resurfacing System: an analysis from the Australian Orthopaedic Association National Joint Replacement Registry.
    de Steiger RN; Hang JR; Miller LN; Graves SE; Davidson DC
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2011 Dec; 93(24):2287-93. PubMed ID: 22258775
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. What Is the Rerevision Rate After Revising a Hip Resurfacing Arthroplasty? Analysis From the AOANJRR.
    Wong JM; Liu YL; Graves S; de Steiger R
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2015 Nov; 473(11):3458-64. PubMed ID: 25721576
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Hip resurfacing data from national joint registries: what do they tell us? What do they not tell us?
    Corten K; MacDonald SJ
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2010 Feb; 468(2):351-7. PubMed ID: 20012720
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Poor outcome of revised resurfacing hip arthroplasty.
    de Steiger RN; Miller LN; Prosser GH; Graves SE; Davidson DC; Stanford TE
    Acta Orthop; 2010 Feb; 81(1):72-6. PubMed ID: 20170416
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. CORR Insights®: Do Fixed or Mobile Bearing Implants Have Better Survivorship in Medial Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty? A Study From the Australian Orthopaedic Association National Joint Replacement Registry.
    Khatod M
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2021 Jul; 479(7):1559-1560. PubMed ID: 34061812
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The Outcome of Cemented Acetabular Components in Total Hip Arthroplasty for Osteoarthritis Defines a Proficiency Threshold: Results of 22,956 Cases From the Australian Orthopaedic Association National Joint Replacement Registry.
    Hanly RJ; Whitehouse SL; Lorimer MF; de Steiger RN; Timperley AJ; Crawford RW; van Bavel D
    J Arthroplasty; 2019 Aug; 34(8):1711-1717. PubMed ID: 31031154
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. CORR Insights®: What Can We Learn From Surgeons Who Perform THA and TKA and Have the Lowest Revision Rates? A Study from the Australian Orthopaedic Association National Joint Replacement Registry.
    Webb ML
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2022 Mar; 480(3):482-484. PubMed ID: 34932023
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Survivorship and clinical outcome of Birmingham hip resurfacing: a minimum ten years' follow-up.
    Azam MQ; McMahon S; Hawdon G; Sankineani SR
    Int Orthop; 2016 Jan; 40(1):1-7. PubMed ID: 25820838
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. CORR Insights®: What Is the Effect of Using a Competing-risks Estimator when Predicting Survivorship After Joint Arthroplasty: A Comparison of Approaches to Survivorship Estimation in a Large Registry.
    Martin BI
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2021 Feb; 479(2):404-405. PubMed ID: 33229899
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Failure rates of metal-on-metal hip resurfacings: analysis of data from the National Joint Registry for England and Wales.
    Smith AJ; Dieppe P; Howard PW; Blom AW;
    Lancet; 2012 Nov; 380(9855):1759-66. PubMed ID: 23036895
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Effect of femoral head size on metal-on-HXLPE hip arthroplasty outcome in a combined analysis of six national and regional registries.
    Allepuz A; Havelin L; Barber T; Sedrakyan A; Graves S; Bordini B; Hoeffel D; Cafri G; Paxton E
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2014 Dec; 96 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):12-8. PubMed ID: 25520414
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Cementless total hip arthroplasty with large diameter metal-on-metal heads: short-term survivorship of 8059 hips from the Finnish Arthroplasty Register.
    Mokka J; Mäkelä KT; Virolainen P; Remes V; Pulkkinen P; Eskelinen A
    Scand J Surg; 2013; 102(2):117-23. PubMed ID: 23820688
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Cost-utility of metal-on-metal hip resurfacing compared to conventional total hip replacement in young active patients with osteoarthritis.
    Heintzbergen S; Kulin NA; Ijzerman MJ; Steuten LM; Werle J; Khong H; Marshall DA
    Value Health; 2013; 16(6):942-52. PubMed ID: 24041344
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. An estimation of the incidence of squeaking and revision surgery for squeaking in ceramic-on-ceramic total hip replacement: a meta-analysis and report from the Australian Orthopaedic Association National Joint Registry.
    Owen DH; Russell NC; Smith PN; Walter WL
    Bone Joint J; 2014 Feb; 96-B(2):181-7. PubMed ID: 24493182
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Implications of Introducing New Technology: Comparative Survivorship Modeling of Metal-on-Metal Hip Replacements and Contemporary Alternatives in the National Joint Registry.
    Hunt LP; Whitehouse MR; Beswick A; Porter ML; Howard P; Blom AW
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2018 Feb; 100(3):189-196. PubMed ID: 29406339
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Independent predictors of revision following metal-on-metal hip resurfacing: a retrospective cohort study using National Joint Registry data.
    Jameson SS; Baker PN; Mason J; Porter ML; Deehan DJ; Reed MR
    J Bone Joint Surg Br; 2012 Jun; 94(6):746-54. PubMed ID: 22628587
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.