BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

136 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32926394)

  • 1. Evaluation of exposure dose in fetal computed tomography using organ-effective modulation.
    Kobayashi M; Haba T; Suzuki S; Nishihara Y; Asada Y; Minami K
    Phys Eng Sci Med; 2020 Dec; 43(4):1195-1206. PubMed ID: 32926394
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Fetal dose evaluation for body CT examinations of pregnant patients during all stages of pregnancy.
    Li X; Yang K; Westra SJ; Liu B
    Eur J Radiol; 2021 Aug; 141():109780. PubMed ID: 34049058
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Estimating fetal dose from tube current-modulated (TCM) and fixed tube current (FTC) abdominal/pelvis CT examinations.
    Hardy AJ; Angel E; Bostani M; Cagnon C; McNitt-Gray M
    Med Phys; 2019 Jun; 46(6):2729-2743. PubMed ID: 30893477
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Fetal doses to pregnant patients from CT with tube current modulation calculated using Monte Carlo simulations and realistic phantoms.
    Gu J; Xu XG; Caracappa PF; Liu B
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2013 Jun; 155(1):64-72. PubMed ID: 23222824
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Radiation doses for pregnant women in the late pregnancy undergoing fetal-computed tomography: a comparison of dosimetry and Monte Carlo simulations.
    Matsunaga Y; Kawaguchi A; Kobayashi M; Suzuki S; Suzuki S; Chida K
    Radiol Phys Technol; 2017 Jun; 10(2):148-154. PubMed ID: 27645287
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The impact on CT dose of the variability in tube current modulation technology: a theoretical investigation.
    Li X; Segars WP; Samei E
    Phys Med Biol; 2014 Aug; 59(16):4525-48. PubMed ID: 25069102
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The development, validation and application of a multi-detector CT (MDCT) scanner model for assessing organ doses to the pregnant patient and the fetus using Monte Carlo simulations.
    Gu J; Bednarz B; Caracappa PF; Xu XG
    Phys Med Biol; 2009 May; 54(9):2699-717. PubMed ID: 19351983
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Reference dataset for benchmarking fetal doses derived from Monte Carlo simulations of CT exams.
    Hardy AJ; Bostani M; Angel E; Cagnon C; Sechopoulos I; McNitt-Gray MF
    Med Phys; 2021 Jan; 48(1):523-532. PubMed ID: 33128259
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. SIZE-SPECIFIC DOSE ESTIMATES IN FETAL COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY.
    Kobayashi M; Nishihara Y; Haba T; Matsunaga Y; Minami K; Asada Y
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2022 May; 198(6):339-348. PubMed ID: 35482288
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Reducing radiation dose to selected organs by selecting the tube start angle in MDCT helical scans: a Monte Carlo based study.
    Zhang D; Zankl M; DeMarco JJ; Cagnon CH; Angel E; Turner AC; McNitt-Gray MF
    Med Phys; 2009 Dec; 36(12):5654-64. PubMed ID: 20095278
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Radiation Dose to the Fetus From Computed Tomography of Pregnant Patients-Development and Validation of a Web-Based Tool.
    Saltybaeva N; Platon A; Poletti PA; Hinzpeter R; Merce MS; Alkadhi H
    Invest Radiol; 2020 Dec; 55(12):762-768. PubMed ID: 32604386
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Evaluation of an organ-based tube current modulation tool in pediatric CT examinations.
    Papadakis AE; Damilakis J
    Eur Radiol; 2020 Oct; 30(10):5728-5737. PubMed ID: 32435930
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Fetal radiation dose in three common CT examinations during pregnancy - Monte Carlo study.
    Kelaranta A; Mäkelä T; Kaasalainen T; Kortesniemi M
    Phys Med; 2017 Nov; 43():199-206. PubMed ID: 28941740
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The profound effects of patient arm positioning on organ doses from CT procedures calculated using Monte Carlo simulations and deformable phantoms.
    Liu H; Gao Y; Ding A; Caracappa PF; Xu XG
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2015 Apr; 164(3):368-75. PubMed ID: 25227436
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A database for estimating organ dose for coronary angiography and brain perfusion CT scans for arbitrary spectra and angular tube current modulation.
    Rupcich F; Badal A; Kyprianou I; Schmidt TG
    Med Phys; 2012 Sep; 39(9):5336-46. PubMed ID: 22957601
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Validation of a Monte Carlo model used for simulating tube current modulation in computed tomography over a wide range of phantom conditions/challenges.
    Bostani M; McMillan K; DeMarco JJ; Cagnon CH; McNitt-Gray MF
    Med Phys; 2014 Nov; 41(11):112101. PubMed ID: 25370652
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Breast exposure reduction using organ-effective modulation on chest CT in Asian women.
    Ota J; Yokota H; Takishima H; Takada A; Irie R; Suzuki Y; Nagashima T; Horikoshi T; Chida K; Masuda Y; Uno T
    Eur J Radiol; 2019 Oct; 119():108651. PubMed ID: 31525679
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Technical Note: Phantom study to evaluate the dose and image quality effects of a computed tomography organ-based tube current modulation technique.
    Gandhi D; Crotty DJ; Stevens GM; Schmidt TG
    Med Phys; 2015 Nov; 42(11):6572-8. PubMed ID: 26520748
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Organ Dose Evaluations Based on Monte Carlo Simulation for CT Examinations Using Tube Current Modulation.
    Fujii K; Nomura K; Muramatsu Y; Obara S; Akahane K; Kusumoto M
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2017 Apr; 174(3):387-394. PubMed ID: 27342451
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Prospective estimation of organ dose in CT under tube current modulation.
    Tian X; Li X; Segars WP; Frush DP; Samei E
    Med Phys; 2015 Apr; 42(4):1575-85. PubMed ID: 25832048
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.