BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

196 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32926894)

  • 1. Diagnostic performance of multifocal photopic negative response, pattern electroretinogram and optical coherence tomography in glaucoma.
    Al-Nosairy KO; Thieme H; Hoffmann MB
    Exp Eye Res; 2020 Nov; 200():108242. PubMed ID: 32926894
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Ganglion cell loss in early glaucoma, as assessed by photopic negative response, pattern electroretinogram, and spectral-domain optical coherence tomography.
    Cvenkel B; Sustar M; Perovšek D
    Doc Ophthalmol; 2017 Aug; 135(1):17-28. PubMed ID: 28567618
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Combined Multi-Modal Assessment of Glaucomatous Damage With Electroretinography and Optical Coherence Tomography/Angiography.
    Al-Nosairy KO; Prabhakaran GT; Pappelis K; Thieme H; Hoffmann MB
    Transl Vis Sci Technol; 2020 Nov; 9(12):7. PubMed ID: 33200048
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Pattern electroretinogram changes in patients with primary open-angle glaucoma in correlation with visual field and optical coherence tomography changes.
    Elgohary AM; Elbedewy HA; Saad HA; Eid TM
    Eur J Ophthalmol; 2020 Nov; 30(6):1362-1369. PubMed ID: 31496271
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparing three different modes of electroretinography in experimental glaucoma: diagnostic performance and correlation to structure.
    Wilsey L; Gowrisankaran S; Cull G; Hardin C; Burgoyne CF; Fortune B
    Doc Ophthalmol; 2017 Apr; 134(2):111-128. PubMed ID: 28243926
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Photopic negative response versus pattern electroretinogram in early glaucoma.
    Preiser D; Lagrèze WA; Bach M; Poloschek CM
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2013 Feb; 54(2):1182-91. PubMed ID: 23307968
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Photopic negative response of full-field electroretinography in patients with different stages of glaucomatous optic neuropathy.
    Kirkiewicz M; Lubiński W; Penkala K
    Doc Ophthalmol; 2016 Feb; 132(1):57-65. PubMed ID: 26831670
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparison between broadband and monochromatic photopic negative response in full-field electroretinogram in controls and subjects with primary open-angle glaucoma.
    Banerjee A; Khurana M; Sachidanandam R; Sen P
    Doc Ophthalmol; 2019 Feb; 138(1):21-33. PubMed ID: 30635745
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Relationship between structural and functional changes in glaucomatous eyes: a multifocal electroretinogram study.
    Tanaka H; Ishida K; Ozawa K; Ishihara T; Sawada A; Mochizuki K; Yamamoto T
    BMC Ophthalmol; 2021 Aug; 21(1):305. PubMed ID: 34418992
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. RETeval Portable Electroretinogram Parameters in Different Severity Stages of Glaucoma.
    Kita Y; Holló G; Saito T; Momota Y; Kita R; Tsunoda K; Hirakata A
    J Glaucoma; 2020 Jul; 29(7):572-580. PubMed ID: 32287150
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Clinical application of photopic negative response of the flash electroretinogram in primary open-angle Glaucoma.
    Huang L; Shen X; Fan N; He J
    Eye Sci; 2012 Sep; 27(3):113-8. PubMed ID: 22993054
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Correlation between photopic negative response and retinal nerve fiber layer thickness and optic disc topography in glaucomatous eyes.
    Machida S; Gotoh Y; Toba Y; Ohtaki A; Kaneko M; Kurosaka D
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2008 May; 49(5):2201-7. PubMed ID: 18436853
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparisons of photopic negative responses elicited by different conditions from glaucomatous eyes.
    Hara Y; Machida S; Ebihara S; Ishizuka M; Tada A; Nishimura T
    Jpn J Ophthalmol; 2020 Mar; 64(2):114-126. PubMed ID: 31900870
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Diagnostic accuracy of ganglion cell complex substructures in different stages of primary open-angle glaucoma.
    Elbendary AM; Abd El-Latef MH; Elsorogy HI; Enaam KM
    Can J Ophthalmol; 2017 Aug; 52(4):355-360. PubMed ID: 28774516
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Electrophysiology in Glaucoma.
    Senger C; Moreto R; Watanabe SES; Matos AG; Paula JS
    J Glaucoma; 2020 Feb; 29(2):147-153. PubMed ID: 31809397
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Macular and Multifocal PERG and FD-OCT in Preperimetric and Hemifield Loss Glaucoma.
    Kreuz AC; de Moraes CG; Hatanaka M; Oyamada MK; Monteiro MLR
    J Glaucoma; 2018 Feb; 27(2):121-132. PubMed ID: 29329137
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Monitoring for glaucoma progression with SAP, electroretinography (PERG and PhNR) and OCT.
    Cvenkel B; Sustar M; Perovšek D
    Doc Ophthalmol; 2022 Feb; 144(1):17-30. PubMed ID: 34652598
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Role of Pattern Electroretinogram in Ocular Hypertension and Early Glaucoma.
    Turkey E; Elsanabary ZSE; Elshazly LHM; Osman MH
    J Glaucoma; 2019 Oct; 28(10):871-877. PubMed ID: 31306362
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Wavelet decomposition analysis in the two-flash multifocal ERG in early glaucoma: a comparison to ganglion cell analysis and visual field.
    Brandao LM; Monhart M; Schötzau A; Ledolter AA; Palmowski-Wolfe AM
    Doc Ophthalmol; 2017 Aug; 135(1):29-42. PubMed ID: 28593391
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Regional variations in correlation between photopic negative response of focal electoretinograms and ganglion cell complex in glaucoma.
    Machida S; Kaneko M; Kurosaka D
    Curr Eye Res; 2015 Apr; 40(4):439-49. PubMed ID: 24871085
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.