These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

364 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32927322)

  • 1. Major Postoperative Complications in Esophageal Cancer After Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy Compared With Open Esophagectomy: An Updated Meta-analysis.
    Pu S; Chen H; Zhou C; Yu S; Liao X; Zhu L; He J; Wang B
    J Surg Res; 2021 Jan; 257():554-571. PubMed ID: 32927322
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Is minimally invasive esophagectomy effective for preventing anastomotic leakages after esophagectomy for cancer? A systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Zhou C; Ma G; Li X; Li J; Yan Y; Liu P; He J; Ren Y
    World J Surg Oncol; 2015 Sep; 13():269. PubMed ID: 26338060
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Superiority of Minimally Invasive Oesophagectomy in Reducing In-Hospital Mortality of Patients with Resectable Oesophageal Cancer: A Meta-Analysis.
    Zhou C; Zhang L; Wang H; Ma X; Shi B; Chen W; He J; Wang K; Liu P; Ren Y
    PLoS One; 2015; 10(7):e0132889. PubMed ID: 26196135
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Long-term Survival in Esophageal Cancer After Minimally Invasive Compared to Open Esophagectomy: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.
    Gottlieb-Vedi E; Kauppila JH; Malietzis G; Nilsson M; Markar SR; Lagergren J
    Ann Surg; 2019 Dec; 270(6):1005-1017. PubMed ID: 30817355
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparisons between minimally invasive and open esophagectomy for esophageal cancer with cervical anastomosis: a retrospective study.
    Li Z; Liu C; Liu Y; Yao S; Xu B; Dong G
    J Cardiothorac Surg; 2020 Jun; 15(1):128. PubMed ID: 32513211
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Minimally invasive versus open esophagectomy for cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Biere SS; Cuesta MA; van der Peet DL
    Minerva Chir; 2009 Apr; 64(2):121-33. PubMed ID: 19365313
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Salvage minimally invasive esophagectomy after definitive chemoradiotherapy for esophageal cancer can improve postoperative complications compared with salvage open esophagectomy.
    Ishiyama K; Oguma J; Kubo K; Kanematsu K; Kurita D; Daiko H
    Surg Endosc; 2022 May; 36(5):3504-3510. PubMed ID: 34642795
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The impact of combined thoracoscopic and laparoscopic surgery on pulmonary complications after radical esophagectomy in patients with resectable esophageal cancer.
    Kubo N; Ohira M; Yamashita Y; Sakurai K; Toyokawa T; Tanaka H; Muguruma K; Shibutani M; Yamazoe S; Kimura K; Nagahara H; Amano R; Ohtani H; Yashiro M; Maeda K; Hirakawa K
    Anticancer Res; 2014 May; 34(5):2399-404. PubMed ID: 24778050
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparison of Clinical Outcomes of Robot-Assisted, Video-Assisted, and Open Esophagectomy for Esophageal Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.
    Mederos MA; de Virgilio MJ; Shenoy R; Ye L; Toste PA; Mak SS; Booth MS; Begashaw MM; Wilson M; Gunnar W; Shekelle PG; Maggard-Gibbons M; Girgis MD
    JAMA Netw Open; 2021 Nov; 4(11):e2129228. PubMed ID: 34724556
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Impact of intraoperative fluid management on postoperative complications in patients undergoing minimally invasive esophagectomy for esophageal cancer: a retrospective single-center study.
    Takahashi M; Toyama H; Takahashi K; Kaiho Y; Ejima Y; Yamauchi M
    BMC Anesthesiol; 2024 Jan; 24(1):29. PubMed ID: 38238681
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Minimally invasive oesophagectomy versus open esophagectomy for resectable esophageal cancer: a meta-analysis.
    Yibulayin W; Abulizi S; Lv H; Sun W
    World J Surg Oncol; 2016 Dec; 14(1):304. PubMed ID: 27927246
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Adaption of surgical procedure in the treatment of submucosal esophageal cancer].
    Hao S; Li Z; Fang W; Mao T; Zhao H; Zhong C
    Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2015 Sep; 18(9):885-8. PubMed ID: 26404683
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Minimally invasive esophagectomy versus open esophagectomy: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Coelho FDS; Barros DE; Santos FA; Meireles FC; Maia FC; Trovisco RA; Machado TM; Barbosa JA
    Eur J Surg Oncol; 2021 Nov; 47(11):2742-2748. PubMed ID: 34148823
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Minimally Invasive Versus open AbdominoThoracic Esophagectomy for esophageal carcinoma (MIVATE) - study protocol for a randomized controlled trial DRKS00016773.
    Nickel F; Probst P; Studier-Fischer A; Nienhüser H; Pauly J; Kowalewski KF; Weiterer S; Knebel P; Diener MK; Weigand MA; Büchler MW; Schmidt T; Müller-Stich BP
    Trials; 2021 Jan; 22(1):41. PubMed ID: 33430937
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Minimally invasive versus open esophagectomy after neoadjuvant therapy for esophageal cancer: a meta-analysis.
    Jin Z; Zhu K; Sun J; Zhang J; Zhang B
    J Cardiothorac Surg; 2023 Mar; 18(1):90. PubMed ID: 36945008
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The influence of minimally invasive esophagectomy versus open esophagectomy on postoperative pulmonary function in esophageal cancer patients: a meta-analysis.
    Su J; Li S; Sui Q; Wang G
    J Cardiothorac Surg; 2022 Jun; 17(1):139. PubMed ID: 35655256
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Effects of Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy and Open Esophagectomy on Circulating Tumor Cell Level in Elderly Patients with Esophageal Cancer.
    Wang HB; Guo Q; Li YH; Sun ZQ; Li TT; Zhang WX; Xiang SS; Li HF
    World J Surg; 2016 Jul; 40(7):1655-62. PubMed ID: 27020921
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Robot-assisted and conventional minimally invasive esophagectomy are associated with better postoperative results compared to hybrid and open transthoracic esophagectomy.
    van der Sluis PC; Babic B; Uzun E; Tagkalos E; Berlth F; Hadzijusufovic E; Lang H; Gockel I; van Hillegersberg R; Grimminger PP
    Eur J Surg Oncol; 2022 Apr; 48(4):776-782. PubMed ID: 34838394
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A standardized comparison of peri-operative complications after minimally invasive esophagectomy: Ivor Lewis versus McKeown.
    Brown AM; Pucci MJ; Berger AC; Tatarian T; Evans NR; Rosato EL; Palazzo F
    Surg Endosc; 2018 Jan; 32(1):204-211. PubMed ID: 28643075
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparison of Up-Front Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy versus Open Esophagectomy on Quality of Life for Esophageal Squamous Cell Cancer.
    Li Z; Cheng J; Zhang Y; Wen S; Lv H; Xu Y; Zhu Y; Zhang Z; Mu D; Tian Z
    Curr Oncol; 2021 Jan; 28(1):693-701. PubMed ID: 33503901
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 19.