These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

159 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32927439)

  • 21. Realistic radiological dispersal device hazard boundaries and ramifications for early consequence management decisions.
    Harper FT; Musolino SV; Wente WB
    Health Phys; 2007 Jul; 93(1):1-16. PubMed ID: 17563488
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Guidance, Training and Exercises for Responding to an Improvised Nuclear Device: First Receivers, Public Health.
    Case C; Coleman CN; Bader JL; Hick J; Hanfling D
    Health Phys; 2018 Feb; 114(2):165-172. PubMed ID: 30086007
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Radionuclide Selection for Emergency Response Exercise at Disaster City® Using Unsealed Radioactive Contamination.
    Cochran LD; Marianno CM
    Health Phys; 2018 Jan; 114(1):7-12. PubMed ID: 30085965
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Development of realistic RDD scenarios and their radiological consequence analyses.
    Shin H; Kim J
    Appl Radiat Isot; 2009; 67(7-8):1516-20. PubMed ID: 19318261
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Radiological threat assessment and the Federal Response Plan--a gap analysis.
    Conklin WC; Liotta PL
    Health Phys; 2005 Nov; 89(5):457-70. PubMed ID: 16217189
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Predicting the Public Health Consequences of a Nuclear Terrorism Attack: Drawing on The Experiences of Hiroshima and Fukushima.
    Jorgensen TJ
    Health Phys; 2018 Jul; 115(1):121-125. PubMed ID: 29787438
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Terrorism-Related Chemical, Biological, Radiation, and Nuclear Attacks: A Historical Global Comparison Influencing the Emergence of Counter-Terrorism Medicine.
    Tin D; Granholm F; Hart A; Ciottone GR
    Prehosp Disaster Med; 2021 Aug; 36(4):399-402. PubMed ID: 34190037
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Risk communication and radiological/nuclear terrorism: a strategic view.
    Becker SM
    Health Phys; 2011 Nov; 101(5):551-8. PubMed ID: 21979539
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Risks and management of radiation exposure.
    Yamamoto LG
    Pediatr Emerg Care; 2013 Sep; 29(9):1016-26; quiz 1027-29. PubMed ID: 24201986
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Sidekicks to the Heroes: How Science and Technology Support First Responders (And How You Can Too).
    Hutter A
    Health Phys; 2018 Feb; 114(2):109-115. PubMed ID: 30085998
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. [Details in relation to emergency planning in case of undesired dispersion of radioactivity].
    Hardeman F
    Verh K Acad Geneeskd Belg; 2005; 67(5-6):341-51. PubMed ID: 16408830
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Willingness to Respond to Radiological Disasters Among First Responders in St. Louis, Missouri.
    Turner JA; Rebmann T; Loux TM; Charney RL
    Health Secur; 2020; 18(4):318-328. PubMed ID: 32816584
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Chernobyl and Goiânia lessons for responding to radiological terrorism.
    Steinhausler F
    Health Phys; 2005 Nov; 89(5):566-74. PubMed ID: 16217200
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Dose assessment for reentry or reoccupancy and recovery of urban areas contaminated by a radiological dispersal device: the need for a consensus approach.
    Sullivan T; Musolino SV; DeFranco J
    Health Phys; 2008 May; 94(5):411-7. PubMed ID: 18403962
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Medical response to a radiologic/nuclear event: integrated plan from the Office of the Assistant Secretary for Preparedness and Response, Department of Health and Human Services.
    Coleman CN; Hrdina C; Bader JL; Norwood A; Hayhurst R; Forsha J; Yeskey K; Knebel A
    Ann Emerg Med; 2009 Feb; 53(2):213-22. PubMed ID: 18387707
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. The impact of communication materials on public responses to a radiological dispersal device (RDD) attack.
    Rogers MB; Amlôt R; Rubin GJ
    Biosecur Bioterror; 2013 Mar; 11(1):49-58. PubMed ID: 23510306
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. French Policies for Victim Management During Mass Radiological Accidents/Attacks.
    Riccobono D; Valente M; Drouet M; Calamai F; Abriat A
    Health Phys; 2018 Jul; 115(1):179-184. PubMed ID: 29787444
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Forensic investigation of incidents involving chemical threat agent: Presentation of the operating procedure developed in Belgium for a field-exercise.
    Kummer N; Augustyns B; Van Rompaey D; De Meulenaere K
    Forensic Sci Int; 2019 Jun; 299():180-186. PubMed ID: 31039546
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. A psychosocial risk assessment and management framework to enhance response to CBRN terrorism threats and attacks.
    Lemyre L; Clément M; Corneil W; Craig L; Boutette P; Tyshenko M; Karyakina N; Clarke R; Krewski D;
    Biosecur Bioterror; 2005; 3(4):316-30. PubMed ID: 16366841
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. A simulation system of radiation field and its detection for nuclear and radiological emergency preparedness and response training.
    Ji Y; Wang X; Zou Y; Li D; Zhang Y; Ning J
    J Radiol Prot; 2022 Jun; 42(2):. PubMed ID: 35613560
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.