231 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32930092)
1. Questionable research practices may have little effect on replicability.
Ulrich R; Miller J
Elife; 2020 Sep; 9():. PubMed ID: 32930092
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Questionable Research Practices, Low Statistical Power, and Other Obstacles to Replicability: Why Preclinical Neuroscience Research Would Benefit from Registered Reports.
Ellis RJ
eNeuro; 2022; 9(4):. PubMed ID: 35922130
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Thinking About Data, Research Methods, and Statistical Analyses: Commentary on Sijtsma's (2014) "Playing with Data".
Waldman ID; Lilienfeld SO
Psychometrika; 2016 Mar; 81(1):16-26. PubMed ID: 25820981
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Individual, institutional, and scientific environment factors associated with questionable research practices in the reporting of messages and conclusions in scientific health services research publications.
Gerrits RG; Mulyanto J; Wammes JD; van den Berg MJ; Klazinga NS; Kringos DS
BMC Health Serv Res; 2020 Sep; 20(1):828. PubMed ID: 32883306
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Questionable research practices among Brazilian psychological researchers: Results from a replication study and an international comparison.
Rabelo ALA; Farias JEM; Sarmet MM; Joaquim TCR; Hoersting RC; Victorino L; Modesto JGN; Pilati R
Int J Psychol; 2020 Aug; 55(4):674-683. PubMed ID: 31745980
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Occurrence and nature of questionable research practices in the reporting of messages and conclusions in international scientific Health Services Research publications: a structured assessment of publications authored by researchers in the Netherlands.
Gerrits RG; Jansen T; Mulyanto J; van den Berg MJ; Klazinga NS; Kringos DS
BMJ Open; 2019 May; 9(5):e027903. PubMed ID: 31097488
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Fifty years of research on questionable research practises in science: quantitative analysis of co-citation patterns.
Neoh MJY; Carollo A; Lee A; Esposito G
R Soc Open Sci; 2023 Oct; 10(10):230677. PubMed ID: 37859842
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Are questionable research practices facilitating new discoveries in sport and exercise medicine? The proportion of supported hypotheses is implausibly high.
Büttner F; Toomey E; McClean S; Roe M; Delahunt E
Br J Sports Med; 2020 Nov; 54(22):1365-1371. PubMed ID: 32699001
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Questionable research practices in ecology and evolution.
Fraser H; Parker T; Nakagawa S; Barnett A; Fidler F
PLoS One; 2018; 13(7):e0200303. PubMed ID: 30011289
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Testing for Questionable Research Practices in a Meta-Analysis: An Example from Experimental Parapsychology.
Bierman DJ; Spottiswoode JP; Bijl A
PLoS One; 2016; 11(5):e0153049. PubMed ID: 27144889
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Research practices and statistical reporting quality in 250 economic psychology master's theses: a meta-research investigation.
Olsen J; Mosen J; Voracek M; Kirchler E
R Soc Open Sci; 2019 Dec; 6(12):190738. PubMed ID: 31903199
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Evaluating the replicability of social science experiments in Nature and Science between 2010 and 2015.
Camerer CF; Dreber A; Holzmeister F; Ho TH; Huber J; Johannesson M; Kirchler M; Nave G; Nosek BA; Pfeiffer T; Altmejd A; Buttrick N; Chan T; Chen Y; Forsell E; Gampa A; Heikensten E; Hummer L; Imai T; Isaksson S; Manfredi D; Rose J; Wagenmakers EJ; Wu H
Nat Hum Behav; 2018 Sep; 2(9):637-644. PubMed ID: 31346273
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. What meta-analyses reveal about the replicability of psychological research.
Stanley TD; Carter EC; Doucouliagos H
Psychol Bull; 2018 Dec; 144(12):1325-1346. PubMed ID: 30321017
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The trustworthiness of the cumulative knowledge in industrial/organizational psychology: The current state of affairs and a path forward.
Keener SK; Kepes S; Torka AK
Acta Psychol (Amst); 2023 Sep; 239():104005. PubMed ID: 37625919
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. HARKing, Cherry-Picking, P-Hacking, Fishing Expeditions, and Data Dredging and Mining as Questionable Research Practices.
Andrade C
J Clin Psychiatry; 2021 Feb; 82(1):. PubMed ID: 33999541
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Optimizing Research Payoff.
Miller J; Ulrich R
Perspect Psychol Sci; 2016 Sep; 11(5):664-691. PubMed ID: 27694463
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. In Defense of the Questionable: Defining the Basis of Research Scientists' Engagement in Questionable Research Practices.
Sacco DF; Bruton SV; Brown M
J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics; 2018 Feb; 13(1):101-110. PubMed ID: 29179623
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Crisis Ahead? Why Human-Robot Interaction User Studies May Have Replicability Problems and Directions for Improvement.
Leichtmann B; Nitsch V; Mara M
Front Robot AI; 2022; 9():838116. PubMed ID: 35360497
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A purely confirmatory replication study of structural brain-behavior correlations.
Boekel W; Wagenmakers EJ; Belay L; Verhagen J; Brown S; Forstmann BU
Cortex; 2015 May; 66():115-33. PubMed ID: 25684445
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Personal Motivations and Systemic Incentives: Scientists on Questionable Research Practices.
Bruton SV; Medlin M; Brown M; Sacco DF
Sci Eng Ethics; 2020 Jun; 26(3):1531-1547. PubMed ID: 31981051
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
