180 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3293108)
1. Prostate cancer: comparison of transrectal US and digital rectal examination for screening.
Lee F; Littrup PJ; Torp-Pedersen ST; Mettlin C; McHugh TA; Gray JM; Kumasaka GH; McLeary RD
Radiology; 1988 Aug; 168(2):389-94. PubMed ID: 3293108
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Early prostate cancer: diagnostic costs of screening transrectal US and digital rectal examination.
Torp-Pedersen ST; Littrup PJ; Lee F; Mettlin C
Radiology; 1988 Nov; 169(2):351-4. PubMed ID: 3140290
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. [Screening of cancer of the prostate: study in a Spanish population].
Herrero Payo JA; Montes Díaz MJ; Páez Borda A; Sánchez Sánchez E; Moreno Valle JA; Berenguer Sánchez A
Arch Esp Urol; 1996; 49(6):595-606. PubMed ID: 8929102
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. [Detection of cancer of the prostate. A study of 600 cases].
Teillac P; Bron J; Tobolski F; Cussenot O; Lesourd A; Leroy M; Toubert ME; Brocheriou C; Laval-Jeantet M; Le Duc A
Ann Urol (Paris); 1990; 24(1):37-41. PubMed ID: 1690963
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Prostate cancer screening within a prostate specific antigen range of 3 to 3.9 ng./ml.: a comparison of digital rectal examination and free prostate specific antigen as supplemental screening tests.
Mäkinen T; Tammela TL; Hakama M; Stenman UH; Rannikko S; Aro J; Juusela H; Määttänen L; Auvinen A
J Urol; 2001 Oct; 166(4):1339-42. PubMed ID: 11547069
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Hypoechoic lesions of the prostate: clinical relevance of tumor size, digital rectal examination, and prostate-specific antigen.
Lee F; Torp-Pedersen S; Littrup PJ; McLeary RD; McHugh TA; Smid AP; Stella PJ; Borlaza GS
Radiology; 1989 Jan; 170(1 Pt 1):29-32. PubMed ID: 2462262
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Prospective evaluation of prostate specific antigen and prostate specific antigen density in the detection of nonpalpable and stage T1C carcinoma of the prostate.
Presti JC; Hovey R; Carroll PR; Shinohara K
J Urol; 1996 Nov; 156(5):1685-90. PubMed ID: 8863571
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Transrectal ultrasound, digital rectal examination, and prostate-specific antigen: preliminary results of an early detection program for prostate cancer.
Lee F; McHugh TA; Solomon MH; Dorr RP; Siders DB; Kirscht JL; Christensen LL; Mitchell A
Scand J Urol Nephrol Suppl; 1991; 137():101-5. PubMed ID: 1719616
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. [Value of determining prostate-specific antigen for early detection or prostatic carcinoma].
Hammerer P; Huland H
Urologe A; 1995 Jul; 34(4):283-9. PubMed ID: 7545842
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. [Transrectal echography and cancer of the prostate. II. Comparison with digital examination of the rectum].
Abad Menor F; Espuela Orgaz R; Nogueras Gimeno MA; Pérez Arbej JA; Martínez Pérez E; Arnaiz Esteban F
Arch Esp Urol; 1990 Apr; 43(3):261-3. PubMed ID: 2196005
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The role of transrectal ultrasound in the early detection of prostate cancer.
Lee F; Torp-Pedersen ST; Siders DB
CA Cancer J Clin; 1989; 39(6):337-60. PubMed ID: 2482116
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Prostate cancer: comparison of digital rectal examination and transrectal ultrasound for screening.
Palken M; Cobb OE; Simons CE; Warren BH; Aldape HC
J Urol; 1991 Jan; 145(1):86-90; discussion 90-2. PubMed ID: 1701498
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Diagnostic performance of malignant prostatic cells detection in blood for early detection of prostate cancer: comparison to prostatic biopsy.
Murray NP; Reyes E; Tapia P; Orellana N; Dueñas R; Fuentealba C; Badinez L
Arch Esp Urol; 2011 Dec; 64(10):961-71. PubMed ID: 22228894
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. [Reliability of endorectal echography of the prostate in the screening and staging of prostatic cancer].
Corbusier A; Vanden Bossche M; Mendes Leal A; Simon J; Wespes E; Van Regemorter G; Schulman CC
Acta Urol Belg; 1989; 57(4):831-41. PubMed ID: 2483601
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Patients with abnormal ultrasound of the prostate but normal digital rectal examination should be classified as having clinical stage T2 tumors.
Tiguert R; Gheiler EL; Grignon DJ; Littrup PJ; Sakr W; Pontes JE; Wood DP
J Urol; 2000 May; 163(5):1486-90. PubMed ID: 10751863
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparison of the efficacy of digital rectal examination and transrectal ultrasonography in the diagnosis of prostatic cancer.
Vallancien G; Prapotnich D; Sibert L; Lugagne PM; Veillon B; Brisset JM; Andre-Bougaran J
Prog Clin Biol Res; 1989; 303():1-9. PubMed ID: 2674978
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. [Diagnosis of localized prostate cancer: screening and preoperative staging].
Hammerer P; Huland H
Urologe A; 1991 Nov; 30(6):378-86. PubMed ID: 1722921
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [Predictive value of prostate specific antigen density in the detection of prostate cancer in patients with elevated prostate specific antigen levels and normal digital rectal findings or stage A prostate cancer].
Iwaki H; Kajita Y; Shimizu Y; Yamauchi T
Hinyokika Kiyo; 2001 Mar; 47(3):169-74. PubMed ID: 11329957
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Correlation of digital rectal examination, prostate specific antigen, and transrectal ultrasound in prostate carcinoma in African Americans.
Sibley RI; Sibley AF
J Natl Med Assoc; 1997 May; 89(5):318-23. PubMed ID: 9170832
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Palpable prostatic nodules: comparison of US and digital guidance for fine-needle aspiration biopsy.
Ajzen SA; Goldenberg SL; Allen GJ; Cooperberg PL; Chan NH; Jones EC
Radiology; 1989 May; 171(2):521-3. PubMed ID: 2649927
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
