These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
154 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32931133)
1. Effects of nerve-sparing procedures on bowel function after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: A longitudinal study. Nishikawa R; Honda M; Teraoka S; Shimizu R; Kimura Y; Iwamoto H; Morizane S; Hikita K; Takenaka A Int J Med Robot; 2020 Dec; 16(6):1-10. PubMed ID: 32931133 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Pathological confirmation of nerve-sparing types performed during robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP). Ko WJ; Hruby GW; Turk AT; Landman J; Badani KK BJU Int; 2013 Mar; 111(3):451-8. PubMed ID: 22900712 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Safety of selective nerve sparing in high risk prostate cancer during robot-assisted radical prostatectomy. Kumar A; Samavedi S; Bates AS; Mouraviev V; Coelho RF; Rocco B; Patel VR J Robot Surg; 2017 Jun; 11(2):129-138. PubMed ID: 27435701 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The impact of nerve-sparing robot-assisted radical prostatectomy on lower urinary tract function: Prospective assessment of patient-reported outcomes and frequency volume charts. Haga N; Hata J; Matsuoka K; Koguchi T; Akaihata H; Kataoka M; Sato Y; Ogawa S; Ishibashi K; Kojima Y Neurourol Urodyn; 2018 Jan; 37(1):322-330. PubMed ID: 28452451 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Baseline factors and surgical procedures affecting changes in lower urinary tract symptoms after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: the impact of nerve-sparing. Soda T; Otsuka H; Koike S; Okada T Int Urol Nephrol; 2024 Mar; 56(3):989-997. PubMed ID: 37907707 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Use of preoperative factors including urodynamic evaluations and nerve-sparing status for predicting urinary continence recovery after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: Nerve-sparing technique contributes to the reduction of postprostatectomy incontinence. Kadono Y; Ueno S; Kadomoto S; Iwamoto H; Takezawa Y; Nakashima K; Nohara T; Izumi K; Mizokami A; Gabata T; Namiki M Neurourol Urodyn; 2016 Nov; 35(8):1034-1039. PubMed ID: 26352154 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Current status of various neurovascular bundle-sparing techniques in robot-assisted radical prostatectomy. Kumar A; Tandon S; Samavedi S; Mouraviev V; Bates AS; Patel VR J Robot Surg; 2016 Sep; 10(3):187-200. PubMed ID: 27251473 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The Use of Augmented Reality to Guide the Intraoperative Frozen Section During Robot-assisted Radical Prostatectomy. Bianchi L; Chessa F; Angiolini A; Cercenelli L; Lodi S; Bortolani B; Molinaroli E; Casablanca C; Droghetti M; Gaudiano C; Mottaran A; Porreca A; Golfieri R; Romagnoli D; Giunchi F; Fiorentino M; Piazza P; Puliatti S; Diciotti S; Marcelli E; Mottrie A; Schiavina R Eur Urol; 2021 Oct; 80(4):480-488. PubMed ID: 34332759 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Stepwise approach for nerve sparing without countertraction during robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: technique and outcomes. Kowalczyk KJ; Huang AC; Hevelone ND; Lipsitz SR; Yu HY; Ulmer WD; Kaplan JR; Patel S; Nguyen PL; Hu JC Eur Urol; 2011 Sep; 60(3):536-47. PubMed ID: 21620561 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [Comparison of functional outcomes after retropubic and robot-assisted radical nerve-sparing prostatectomy conducted by surgeons with total caseloads of over 1000 prostatectomies]. Pushkar DY; Dyakov VV; Vasilyev AO; Kotenko DV Urologiia; 2017 Apr; (1):50-53. PubMed ID: 28394523 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Does surgeon subjective nerve sparing score predict recovery time of erectile function following robot-assisted radical prostatectomy? Kang SG; Schatloff O; Haidar AM; Samavedi S; Palmer KJ; Cheon J; Patel VR J Sex Med; 2015 Jun; 12(6):1490-6. PubMed ID: 25689342 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Effects of nerve-sparing procedures on surgical margins after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy. Yang CW; Wang HH; Fayez Hassouna M; Chand M; Huang WJ; Chung HJ J Chin Med Assoc; 2022 Dec; 85(12):1131-1135. PubMed ID: 36083634 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. 3D printed patient-specific prostate cancer models to guide nerve-sparing robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: a systematic review. Coles-Black J; Ong S; Teh J; Kearns P; Ischia J; Bolton D; Lawrentschuk N J Robot Surg; 2023 Feb; 17(1):1-10. PubMed ID: 35349074 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Nerve-sparing in salvage robot-assisted prostatectomy: surgical technique, oncological and functional outcomes at a single high-volume institution. Bonet X; Ogaya-Pinies G; Woodlief T; Hernandez-Cardona E; Ganapathi H; Rogers T; Coelho RF; Rocco B; Vigués F; Patel V BJU Int; 2018 Nov; 122(5):837-844. PubMed ID: 30126045 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparing pentafecta outcomes between nerve sparing and non nerve sparing robot-assisted radical prostatectomy in a propensity score-matched study. Bejrananda T; Takahara K; Sowanthip D; Motonaga T; Yagi K; Nakamura W; Saruta M; Nukaya T; Takenaka M; Zennami K; Ichino M; Sasaki H; Sumitomo M; Shiroki R Sci Rep; 2023 Sep; 13(1):15835. PubMed ID: 37740045 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A Pragmatic Randomized Controlled Trial Examining the Impact of the Retzius-sparing Approach on Early Urinary Continence Recovery After Robot-assisted Radical Prostatectomy. Dalela D; Jeong W; Prasad MA; Sood A; Abdollah F; Diaz M; Karabon P; Sammon J; Jamil M; Baize B; Simone A; Menon M Eur Urol; 2017 Nov; 72(5):677-685. PubMed ID: 28483330 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Prospective assessment of time-dependent changes in quality of life of Japanese patients with prostate cancer following robot-assisted radical prostatectomy. Miyake H; Miyazaki A; Furukawa J; Hinata N; Fujisawa M J Robot Surg; 2016 Sep; 10(3):201-7. PubMed ID: 26885662 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]