These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

174 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32934556)

  • 1. Gamblers' (mis-)interpretations of Problem Gambling Severity Index items: Ambiguities in qualitative accounts from the Swedish Longitudinal Gambling Study.
    Samuelsson E; Wennberg P; Sundqvist K
    Nordisk Alkohol Nark; 2019 Apr; 36(2):140-160. PubMed ID: 32934556
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Measuring Gambling Harm: The Influence of Response Scaling on Estimates and the Distribution of Harm Across PGSI Categories.
    Delfabbro P; Georgiou N; King DL
    J Gambl Stud; 2021 Jun; 37(2):583-598. PubMed ID: 32424665
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The relationship between gambling behaviour and gambling-related harm: A data fusion approach using open banking data.
    Zendle D; Newall P
    Addiction; 2024 May; ():. PubMed ID: 38783667
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Using machine learning to retrospectively predict self-reported gambling problems in Quebec.
    Murch WS; Kairouz S; Dauphinais S; Picard E; Costes JM; French M
    Addiction; 2023 Aug; 118(8):1569-1578. PubMed ID: 36880253
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Positive play and its relationship with gambling harms and benefits.
    Delfabbro P; King DL; Georgiou N
    J Behav Addict; 2020 Jun; 9(2):363-370. PubMed ID: 32634113
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Separating Behaviours and Adverse Consequences in the Problem Gambling Severity Index (PGSI): A Confirmatory Factor Analysis and Rasch Analysis.
    Cooper A; Marmurek HHC
    J Gambl Stud; 2023 Dec; 39(4):1523-1536. PubMed ID: 37544962
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Using artificial intelligence algorithms to predict self-reported problem gambling with account-based player data in an online casino setting.
    Auer M; Griffiths MD
    J Gambl Stud; 2023 Sep; 39(3):1273-1294. PubMed ID: 35852779
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Validation of the problem gambling severity index using confirmatory factor analysis and rasch modelling.
    Miller NV; Currie SR; Hodgins DC; Casey D
    Int J Methods Psychiatr Res; 2013 Sep; 22(3):245-55. PubMed ID: 24014164
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Understanding gambling in the United Kingdom: A qualitative study on the experiences of gamblers' families.
    Azemi F; Avdyli M; Bytyqi V
    Front Psychol; 2023; 14():1009923. PubMed ID: 36949903
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Gambler clusters and problem gambling severity: A cluster analysis of Swedish gamblers accessing an online problem gambling screener.
    Wall H; Berman AH; Jayaram-Lindström N; Hellner C; Rosendahl I
    Psychol Addict Behav; 2021 Feb; 35(1):102-112. PubMed ID: 32614206
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Internet gamblers: a latent class analysis of their behaviours and health experiences.
    Lloyd J; Doll H; Hawton K; Dutton WH; Geddes JR; Goodwin GM; Rogers RD
    J Gambl Stud; 2010 Sep; 26(3):387-99. PubMed ID: 20422442
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The identification of Australian low-risk gambling limits: A comparison of gambling-related harm measures.
    Dowling NA; Greenwood CJ; Merkouris SS; Youssef GJ; Browne M; Rockloff M; Myers P
    J Behav Addict; 2021 Mar; 10(1):21-34. PubMed ID: 33793416
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Is it all about money? A qualitative analysis of problem gamblers' conceptualisations of money.
    Heiskanen M
    Nordisk Alkohol Nark; 2017 Oct; 34(5):362-374. PubMed ID: 32934498
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Exploring the association between loot boxes and problem gambling: Are video gamers referring to loot boxes when they complete gambling screening tools?
    Sidloski B; Brooks GA; Zhang K; Clark L
    Addict Behav; 2022 Aug; 131():107318. PubMed ID: 35381433
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Enhancing the utility of the problem gambling severity index in clinical settings: Identifying refined categories within the problem gambling category.
    Merkouris SS; Greenwood C; Manning V; Oakes J; Rodda S; Lubman D; Dowling NA
    Addict Behav; 2020 Apr; 103():106257. PubMed ID: 31884377
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Problem Gambling Features and Gendered Gambling Domains Amongst Regular Gamblers in a Swedish Population-Based Study.
    Svensson J; Romild U
    Sex Roles; 2014; 70(5):240-254. PubMed ID: 24634562
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Development of the Online Problem Gaming Behavior Index: A New Scale Based on Actual Problem Gambling Behavior Rather Than the Consequences of it.
    Auer M; Ricijas N; Kranzelic V; Griffiths MD
    Eval Health Prof; 2024 Mar; 47(1):81-92. PubMed ID: 37243668
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Development and validation of a prediction model for online gambling problems based on players' account data.
    Perrot B; Hardouin JB; Thiabaud E; Saillard A; Grall-Bronnec M; Challet-Bouju G
    J Behav Addict; 2022 Sep; 11(3):874-889. PubMed ID: 36125924
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Validation of a one item screen for problem gambling.
    Rockloff MJ; Ehrich J; Themessl-Huber M; Evans LG
    J Gambl Stud; 2011 Dec; 27(4):701-7. PubMed ID: 21210191
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Public attitudes towards gambling product harm and harm reduction strategies: an online study of 16-88 year olds in Victoria, Australia.
    Thomas SL; Randle M; Bestman A; Pitt H; Bowe SJ; Cowlishaw S; Daube M
    Harm Reduct J; 2017 Jul; 14(1):49. PubMed ID: 28743300
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.