These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
138 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32935281)
41. Striving for the moral self: the effects of recalling past moral actions on future moral behavior. Jordan J; Mullen E; Murnighan JK Pers Soc Psychol Bull; 2011 May; 37(5):701-13. PubMed ID: 21402752 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
42. Hypercorrection of high-confidence errors in the classroom. Carpenter SK; Haynes CL; Corral D; Yeung KL Memory; 2018 Nov; 26(10):1379-1384. PubMed ID: 29781391 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
43. Dishonest deed, clear conscience: when cheating leads to moral disengagement and motivated forgetting. Shu LL; Gino F; Bazerman MH Pers Soc Psychol Bull; 2011 Mar; 37(3):330-49. PubMed ID: 21307176 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. Memory load of information encoded amplifies the magnitude of hindsight bias. Kaida K; Kaida N PLoS One; 2023; 18(4):e0283969. PubMed ID: 37036855 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
45. Recognition memory: Tulving's contributions and some new findings. Roediger HL; Tekin E Neuropsychologia; 2020 Mar; 139():107350. PubMed ID: 31978402 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
46. Amplifying deceivers' flawed metacognition: Encouraging disclosures after delays with a model statement. Harvey AC; Vrij A; Leal S; Hope L; Mann S Acta Psychol (Amst); 2019 Sep; 200():102935. PubMed ID: 31715443 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
47. Evaluating semantic metamemory: Retrospective confidence judgements on the information subtest. Ladowsky-Brooks RL Appl Neuropsychol Adult; 2018; 25(2):137-148. PubMed ID: 27936927 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. When asking the question changes the ultimate answer: Metamemory judgments change memory. Mitchum AL; Kelley CM; Fox MC J Exp Psychol Gen; 2016 Feb; 145(2):200-19. PubMed ID: 27045282 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. How surveillance begets perceptions of dishonesty: the case of the counterfactual sinner. Miller DT; Visser PS; Staub BD J Pers Soc Psychol; 2005 Aug; 89(2):117-28. PubMed ID: 16162048 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. Insight across mental disorders: A multifaceted metacognitive phenomenon. Konstantakopoulos G Psychiatriki; 2019; 30(1):13-16. PubMed ID: 31115349 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. Easy to retrieve but hard to believe: metacognitive discounting of the unpleasantly possible. O'Brien E Psychol Sci; 2013 Jun; 24(6):844-51. PubMed ID: 23558549 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. The slow decay and quick revival of self-deception. Chance Z; Gino F; Norton MI; Ariely D Front Psychol; 2015; 6():1075. PubMed ID: 26347666 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
53. How specific is source memory for faces of cheaters? Evidence for categorical emotional tagging. Bell R; Buchner A; Erdfelder E; Giang T; Schain C; Riether N J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2012 Mar; 38(2):457-72. PubMed ID: 22022957 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. Beliefs about memory decline in aging do not impact judgments of learning (JOLs): A challenge for belief-based explanations of JOLs. Tauber SK; Witherby AE; Dunlosky J Mem Cognit; 2019 Aug; 47(6):1102-1119. PubMed ID: 30859406 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55. Modulation of financial deprivation on deception and its neural correlates. Sun P; Ling X; Zheng L; Chen J; Li L; Liu Z; Cheng X; Guo X Exp Brain Res; 2017 Nov; 235(11):3271-3277. PubMed ID: 28765994 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]