These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

156 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32935884)

  • 1. Portfolio Seismic Loss Estimation and Risk-based Critical Scenarios for Residential Wooden Houses in Victoria, British Columbia, and Canada.
    Goda K; Zhang L; Tesfamariam S
    Risk Anal; 2021 Jun; 41(6):1019-1037. PubMed ID: 32935884
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Diffusion of epicenters of earthquake aftershocks, Omori's law, and generalized continuous-time random walk models.
    Helmstetter A; Sornette D
    Phys Rev E Stat Nonlin Soft Matter Phys; 2002 Dec; 66(6 Pt 1):061104. PubMed ID: 12513267
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The Impact of Portfolio Location Uncertainty on Probabilistic Seismic Risk Analysis.
    Scheingraber C; Käser MA
    Risk Anal; 2019 Mar; 39(3):695-712. PubMed ID: 30144111
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Earthquake segmentation in northern Chile correlates with curved plate geometry.
    Shrivastava MN; González G; Moreno M; Soto H; Schurr B; Salazar P; Báez JC
    Sci Rep; 2019 Mar; 9(1):4403. PubMed ID: 30867445
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Post-earthquake damage classification and assessment: case study of the residential buildings after the
    Mouloud H; Chaker A; Nassim H; Lebdioui S; Rodrigues H; Agius MR
    Bull Earthq Eng; 2023; 21(2):849-891. PubMed ID: 36466195
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Association between the incidence of premature rupture of membranes in pregnant women and seismic intensity of the Noto Peninsula earthquake.
    Sekizuka N; Sakai A; Aoyama K; Kohama T; Nakahama Y; Fujita S; Hibino Y; Hitomi Y; Kambayashi Y; Nakamura H
    Environ Health Prev Med; 2010 Sep; 15(5):292-8. PubMed ID: 21432558
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Assessment of seismic loss dependence using copula.
    Goda K; Ren J
    Risk Anal; 2010 Jul; 30(7):1076-91. PubMed ID: 20409045
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Assessment of seismic hazards in Yemen.
    Alrubaidi M; Alhaddad MS; Al-Safi SIH; Alhammadi SA; Yahya AS; Abadel AA
    Heliyon; 2021 Dec; 7(12):e08520. PubMed ID: 34934838
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Virtual Scenarios of Earthquake Early Warning to Disaster Management in Smart Cities Based on Auxiliary Classifier Generative Adversarial Networks.
    Ahn JK; Kim B; Ku B; Hwang EH
    Sensors (Basel); 2023 Nov; 23(22):. PubMed ID: 38005595
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A population-based study on the immediate and prolonged effects of the 1999 Taiwan earthquake on mortality.
    Chan CC; Lin YP; Chen HH; Chang TY; Cheng TJ; Chen LS
    Ann Epidemiol; 2003 Aug; 13(7):502-8. PubMed ID: 12932625
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The Spitak (Armenia, USSR) Earthquake: Residential Building Typology and Seismic Behaviour.
    Pomonis A
    Disasters; 1990 Jun; 14(2):89-114. PubMed ID: 20958696
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Empirical assessment of seismic design hazard's exceedance area.
    Iervolino I; Vitale A; Cito P
    Sci Rep; 2021 Sep; 11(1):18803. PubMed ID: 34552190
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Earthquake Shaking and Damage to Buildings: Recent evidence for severe ground shaking raises questions about the earthquake resistance of structures.
    Page RA; Joyner WB; Blume JA
    Science; 1975 Aug; 189(4203):601-8. PubMed ID: 17838741
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Review of Seismic Risk Mitigation Policies in Earthquake-Prone Countries: Lessons for Earthquake Resilience in the United States.
    Zhang Y; Fung JF; Johnson KJ; Sattar S
    J Earthq Eng; 2022; 26(12):. PubMed ID: 36967727
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Implementation of equity in resource allocation for regional earthquake risk mitigation using two-stage stochastic programming.
    Zolfaghari MR; Peyghaleh E
    Risk Anal; 2015 Mar; 35(3):434-58. PubMed ID: 25676412
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Urban Seismic Risk Assessment by Integrating Direct Economic Loss and Loss of Statistical Life: An Empirical Study in Xiamen, China.
    Zhou S; Zhai G; Shi Y; Lu Y
    Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2020 Nov; 17(21):. PubMed ID: 33158215
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A Bayesian Network Model for Seismic Risk Analysis.
    Zhang Y; Weng WG
    Risk Anal; 2021 Oct; 41(10):1809-1822. PubMed ID: 33480025
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Earthquake loss estimation of residential buildings in Bantul regency, Indonesia.
    Aulady MFN; Fujimi T
    Jamba; 2019; 11(1):756. PubMed ID: 31308882
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. 2019 Ambon aftershocks catalogue data compiled using local and regional seismic networks.
    Sahara DP; Nugraha AD; Muhari A; Rusdin AA; Rosalia S; Priyono A; Zulfakriza Z; Widiyantoro S; Puspito NT; Lesmana A; Kusumawati D; Ardianto A; Baskara AW; Halauwet Y; Shiddiqi HA
    Data Brief; 2021 Feb; 34():106728. PubMed ID: 33537368
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Earthquake hazard and risk analysis for natural and induced seismicity: towards objective assessments in the face of uncertainty.
    Bommer JJ
    Bull Earthq Eng; 2022; 20(6):2825-3069. PubMed ID: 35474945
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.