181 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32936399)
1. Linear measurement accuracy of CBCT panoramic reconstructions: experimental study with dry human mandibles.
Almeida VSM; Bomfim RT; Sobreira ACR; Barbosa IDS; Leite-Ribeiro PM; Rubira-Bullen IR; Sarmento VA
Oral Radiol; 2021 Jul; 37(3):421-426. PubMed ID: 32936399
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Accuracy of linear measurements using cone beam computed tomography and panoramic radiography in dental implant treatment planning.
Luangchana P; Pornprasertsuk-Damrongsri S; Kiattavorncharoen S; Jirajariyavej B
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2015; 30(6):1287-94. PubMed ID: 26574854
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Dimensional error of three-dimensional images generated by different software.
Pimentel PA; Bomfim RT; Andrade LC; Ferraz EG; Ribeiro Lamberti PL; Rubira-Bullen IR; Sarmento VA
J Med Eng Technol; 2015; 39(8):480-4. PubMed ID: 26200519
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Accuracy of linear measurements from cone-beam computed tomography-derived surface models of different voxel sizes.
Damstra J; Fourie Z; Huddleston Slater JJ; Ren Y
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2010 Jan; 137(1):16.e1-6; discussion 16-7. PubMed ID: 20122425
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparison of the accuracy of cone beam computed tomography and medical computed tomography: implications for clinical diagnostics with guided surgery.
Abboud M; Calvo-Guirado JL; Orentlicher G; Wahl G
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2013; 28(2):536-42. PubMed ID: 23527357
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Accuracy of linear measurements performed with two imaging software in cone-beam computed tomography scans of dry human mandibles.
Silva AALS; Franco A; Fernandes Â; Costa C; Barbosa JS; Westphalen FH
An Acad Bras Cienc; 2017; 89(4):2865-2873. PubMed ID: 29236870
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Accuracy of the measurements from multiplanar and sagittal reconstructions of CBCT.
Barreto MS; da Silva Barbosa I; Miranda Leite-Ribeiro P; de Araújo TM; Almeida Sarmento V
Orthod Craniofac Res; 2020 May; 23(2):223-228. PubMed ID: 31889381
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparison between 3D volumetric rendering and multiplanar slices on the reliability of linear measurements on CBCT images: an in vitro study.
Fernandes TM; Adamczyk J; Poleti ML; Henriques JF; Friedland B; Garib DG
J Appl Oral Sci; 2015; 23(1):56-63. PubMed ID: 25004053
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Custom Focal Trough in Cone-Beam Computed Tomography Reformatted Panoramic Versus Digital Panoramic for Mental Foramen Position to Aid Implant Planning.
Beshtawi K; Qirresh E; Parker M; Shaik S
J Clin Imaging Sci; 2020; 10():34. PubMed ID: 32547837
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Reliability and accuracy of linear measurements in cone-beam computed tomography using different software programs and voxel sizes.
Tolentino ES; Yamashita FC; de Albuquerque S; Walewski LA; Iwaki LCV; Takeshita WM; Silva MC
J Conserv Dent; 2018; 21(6):607-612. PubMed ID: 30546204
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Accuracy of linear measurements and visibility of the mandibular canal of cone-beam computed tomography images with different voxel sizes: an in vitro study.
Waltrick KB; Nunes de Abreu Junior MJ; Corrêa M; Zastrow MD; Dutra VD
J Periodontol; 2013 Jan; 84(1):68-77. PubMed ID: 22390549
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Accuracy of linear measurements in cone beam computed tomography with different voxel sizes.
Torres MG; Campos PS; Segundo NP; Navarro M; Crusoé-Rebello I
Implant Dent; 2012 Apr; 21(2):150-5. PubMed ID: 22382754
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparison of the accuracy of 3-dimensional cone-beam computed tomography and micro-computed tomography reconstructions by using different voxel sizes.
Maret D; Peters OA; Galibourg A; Dumoncel J; Esclassan R; Kahn JL; Sixou M; Telmon N
J Endod; 2014 Sep; 40(9):1321-6. PubMed ID: 25146011
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Planning of dental implant size with digital panoramic radiographs, CBCT-generated panoramic images, and CBCT cross-sectional images.
Correa LR; Spin-Neto R; Stavropoulos A; Schropp L; da Silveira HE; Wenzel A
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2014 Jun; 25(6):690-5. PubMed ID: 23442085
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Panoramic cone beam computed tomography.
Chang J; Zhou L; Wang S; Clifford Chao KS
Med Phys; 2012 May; 39(5):2930-46. PubMed ID: 22559664
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. [Evaluation of the accuracy of alveolar bone height measurement in vitro by cone beam computed tomography].
Fang D; Jiang H; Lin Z
Hua Xi Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2012 Dec; 30(6):603-6. PubMed ID: 23330369
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Automated measurement for image distortion analysis in 2D panoramic imaging of dental CBCT system: A phantom study.
Rabba JA; Suhaimi FM; Mat Jafri MZ; Jaafar HA; Osman ND
Radiography (Lond); 2023 May; 29(3):533-538. PubMed ID: 36913788
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparative study of mandibular linear measurements obtained by cone beam computed tomography and digital calipers.
Tarazona-Álvarez P; Romero-Millán J; Peñarrocha-Oltra D; Fuster-Torres MÁ; Tarazona B; Peñarrocha-Diago M
J Clin Exp Dent; 2014 Jul; 6(3):e271-4. PubMed ID: 25136429
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Effect of Mandibular Angulation on Pre-Implant Site Measurement Accuracy Using CBCT.
Önem E; Baksı BG; Turhal RI; Şen BH
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2021; 36(5):937–943. PubMed ID: 34157066
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparison of linear and volumetric measurements obtained from periodontal defects by using cone beam-CT and micro-CT: an in vitro study.
Tayman MA; Kamburoğlu K; Küçük Ö; Ateş FSÖ; Günhan M
Clin Oral Investig; 2019 May; 23(5):2235-2244. PubMed ID: 30284102
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
