224 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32936995)
1. Phosphoproteome Analysis in Immune Cell Signaling.
Rathore D; Nita-Lazar A
Curr Protoc Immunol; 2020 Sep; 130(1):e105. PubMed ID: 32936995
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A Methodology for Comprehensive Analysis of Toll-Like Receptor Signaling in Macrophages.
Koppenol-Raab M; Nita-Lazar A
Methods Mol Biol; 2017; 1636():301-312. PubMed ID: 28730487
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Phosphoproteome profiling of the macrophage response to different toll-like receptor ligands identifies differences in global phosphorylation dynamics.
Sjoelund V; Smelkinson M; Nita-Lazar A
J Proteome Res; 2014 Nov; 13(11):5185-97. PubMed ID: 24941444
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Fractionation of Enriched Phosphopeptides Using pH/Acetonitrile-Gradient-Reversed-Phase Microcolumn Separation in Combination with LC-MS/MS Analysis.
Ondrej M; Rehulka P; Rehulkova H; Kupcik R; Tichy A
Int J Mol Sci; 2020 Jun; 21(11):. PubMed ID: 32492839
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Combining Metabolic ¹⁵N Labeling with Improved Tandem MOAC for Enhanced Probing of the Phosphoproteome.
Thomas M; Huck N; Hoehenwarter W; Conrath U; Beckers GJ
Methods Mol Biol; 2015; 1306():81-96. PubMed ID: 25930695
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A Rapid and Universal Workflow for Label-Free-Quantitation-Based Proteomic and Phosphoproteomic Studies in Cereals.
He M; Wang J; Herold S; Xi L; Schulze WX
Curr Protoc; 2022 Jun; 2(6):e425. PubMed ID: 35674286
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Investigation of receptor interacting protein (RIP3)-dependent protein phosphorylation by quantitative phosphoproteomics.
Wu X; Tian L; Li J; Zhang Y; Han V; Li Y; Xu X; Li H; Chen X; Chen J; Jin W; Xie Y; Han J; Zhong CQ
Mol Cell Proteomics; 2012 Dec; 11(12):1640-51. PubMed ID: 22942356
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Rapid Shotgun Phosphoproteomics Analysis.
Carrera M; Cañas B; Lopez-Ferrer D
Methods Mol Biol; 2021; 2259():259-268. PubMed ID: 33687721
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Off-line high-pH reversed-phase fractionation for in-depth phosphoproteomics.
Batth TS; Francavilla C; Olsen JV
J Proteome Res; 2014 Dec; 13(12):6176-86. PubMed ID: 25338131
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparison of different fractionation strategies for in-depth phosphoproteomics by liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry.
Yeh TT; Ho MY; Chen WY; Hsu YC; Ku WC; Tseng HW; Chen ST; Chen SF
Anal Bioanal Chem; 2019 Jun; 411(15):3417-3424. PubMed ID: 31011783
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Deep Profiling of Proteome and Phosphoproteome by Isobaric Labeling, Extensive Liquid Chromatography, and Mass Spectrometry.
Bai B; Tan H; Pagala VR; High AA; Ichhaporia VP; Hendershot L; Peng J
Methods Enzymol; 2017; 585():377-395. PubMed ID: 28109439
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Isotope-labeling and affinity enrichment of phosphopeptides for proteomic analysis using liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry.
Kota U; Chien KY; Goshe MB
Methods Mol Biol; 2009; 564():303-21. PubMed ID: 19544030
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Mass Spectrometry-Based Proteomics for Quantifying DNA Damage-Induced Phosphorylation.
Borisova ME; Wagner SA; Beli P
Methods Mol Biol; 2017; 1599():215-227. PubMed ID: 28477122
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. High pH Reversed-Phase Micro-Columns for Simple, Sensitive, and Efficient Fractionation of Proteome and (TMT labeled) Phosphoproteome Digests.
Ruprecht B; Zecha J; Zolg DP; Kuster B
Methods Mol Biol; 2017; 1550():83-98. PubMed ID: 28188525
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Mass Spectrometry-Based Proteomics for Analysis of Hydrophilic Phosphopeptides.
Tsai CF; Smith JS; Eiger DS; Martin K; Liu T; Smith RD; Shi T; Rajagopal S; Jacobs JM
Methods Mol Biol; 2021; 2259():247-257. PubMed ID: 33687720
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Combined enzymatic and data mining approaches for comprehensive phosphoproteome analyses: application to cell signaling events of interferon-gamma-stimulated macrophages.
Marcantonio M; Trost M; Courcelles M; Desjardins M; Thibault P
Mol Cell Proteomics; 2008 Apr; 7(4):645-60. PubMed ID: 18006492
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. SILAC-Based Quantitative Phosphoproteomics in Yeast.
Hernáez ML; Gil C
Methods Mol Biol; 2023; 2603():103-115. PubMed ID: 36370273
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Quantitative proteome and phosphoproteome analysis of human pluripotent stem cells.
Muñoz J; Heck AJ
Methods Mol Biol; 2011; 767():297-312. PubMed ID: 21822884
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Sequential Phosphopeptide Enrichment for Phosphoproteome Analysis of Filamentous Fungi: A Test Case Using Magnaporthe oryzae.
Oh Y; Franck WL; Dean RA
Methods Mol Biol; 2018; 1848():81-91. PubMed ID: 30182230
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Multidimensional electrostatic repulsion-hydrophilic interaction chromatography (ERLIC) for quantitative analysis of the proteome and phosphoproteome in clinical and biomedical research.
Loroch S; Schommartz T; Brune W; Zahedi RP; Sickmann A
Biochim Biophys Acta; 2015 May; 1854(5):460-8. PubMed ID: 25619855
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
