These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

137 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32937044)

  • 1.
    Rosen JD
    N Engl J Med; 2020 Sep; 383(12):1101-1103. PubMed ID: 32937044
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The Legal Challenge of Abortion Stigma-and Government Restrictions on the Practice of Medicine.
    Fox D
    Hastings Cent Rep; 2020 Mar; 50(2):13-15. PubMed ID: 32311137
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Consti-tortion: tort law as an end-run around abortion rights after Planned Parenthood v. Casey.
    Stone AJ
    Am Univ J Gend Soc Policy Law; 2000; 8(2):471-515. PubMed ID: 16594110
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Informed consent and the First Amendment.
    Mariner WK; Annas GJ
    N Engl J Med; 2015 Apr; 372(14):1285-7. PubMed ID: 25830420
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. South Dakota's abortion script--threatening the physician-patient relationship.
    Lazzarini Z
    N Engl J Med; 2008 Nov; 359(21):2189-91. PubMed ID: 19020321
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Mazurek v. Armstrong: should states be allowed to restrict the performance of abortions to licensed physicians only?
    Bazzelle RY
    Thurgood Marshall Law Rev; 1998; 24(1):149-82. PubMed ID: 16200693
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Minor rights: the adolescent abortion cases.
    Guggenheim M
    Hofstra Law Rev; 2002; 30(3):589-646. PubMed ID: 15212070
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Informed consent laws and the constitution: balancing state interests with a physician's first amendment rights and a woman's due process rights.
    Runels S
    J Contemp Health Law Policy; 2009; 26(1):185-211. PubMed ID: 20112623
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. What happens if Roe is overruled? Extraterritorial regulation of abortion by the states.
    Bradford CS
    Ariz Law Rev; 1993; 35(1):87-171. PubMed ID: 12645556
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Journey through the courts: minors, abortion and the quest for reproductive fairness.
    Ehrlich JS
    Yale J Law Fem; 1998; 10(1):1-27. PubMed ID: 16596765
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. How the doctor got gagged. The disintegrating right of privacy in the physician-patient relationship.
    Sugarman J; Powers M
    JAMA; 1991 Dec; 266(23):3323-7. PubMed ID: 1960832
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Assessing the viability of a substantive due process right to in vitro fertilization.
    Harv Law Rev; 2005 Jun; 118(8):2792-813. PubMed ID: 15988862
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Forgotten Supreme Court abortion cases: Drs. Hawker and Hurwitz in the deck and defrocked.
    Lucas R
    Pepperdine Law Rev; 2003 May; 30(4):641-70. PubMed ID: 15237509
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. What "choice" do they have?: protecting pregnant minors' reproductive rights using state constitutions.
    Weissmann R
    Annu Surv Am Law; 1999; 1999(1):129-67. PubMed ID: 11958234
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The pregnant silence: Rust v. Sullivan, abortion rights, and publicly funded speech.
    Weeks AB
    North Carol Law Rev; 1992 Jun; 70(5):1623-68. PubMed ID: 16044600
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The Commerce Clause and federal abortion law: why progressives might be tempted to embrace federalism.
    Goldberg J
    Fordham Law Rev; 2006 Oct; 75(1):301-54. PubMed ID: 17115483
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The right of privacy protects the doctor-patient relationship.
    Annas GJ; Glantz LH; Mariner WK
    JAMA; 1990 Feb; 263(6):858-61. PubMed ID: 2296149
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Two ships passing in the night: an interpretavist review of the White-Stevens colloquy on Roe v. Wade.
    Horan DJ; Forsythe CD; Grant ER
    St Louis Univ Public Law Rev; 1987; 6(2):229-311. PubMed ID: 16086461
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Physicians and the first amendment.
    Kim HC
    J Leg Med; 2010 Oct; 31(4):423-32. PubMed ID: 21184316
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Does the Thirteenth Amendment provide a jurisdictional basis for a federal ban on cloning?
    Vinck SC
    J Legis; 2003; 30(1):183-91. PubMed ID: 17256218
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.