These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

150 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32937209)

  • 1. Learning in anticipation of reward and punishment: perspectives across the human lifespan.
    Betts MJ; Richter A; de Boer L; Tegelbeckers J; Perosa V; Baumann V; Chowdhury R; Dolan RJ; Seidenbecher C; Schott BH; Düzel E; Guitart-Masip M; Krauel K
    Neurobiol Aging; 2020 Dec; 96():49-57. PubMed ID: 32937209
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The Role of the Striatum in Learning to Orthogonalize Action and Valence: A Combined PET and 7 T MRI Aging Study.
    Perosa V; de Boer L; Ziegler G; Apostolova I; Buchert R; Metzger C; Amthauer H; Guitart-Masip M; Düzel E; Betts MJ
    Cereb Cortex; 2020 May; 30(5):3340-3351. PubMed ID: 31897476
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Dopamine Selectively Modulates the Outcome of Learning Unnatural Action-Valence Associations.
    Van Wouwe NC; Claassen DO; Neimat JS; Kanoff KE; Wylie SA
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2017 May; 29(5):816-826. PubMed ID: 28129053
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Age-dependent Pavlovian biases influence motor decision-making.
    Chen X; Rutledge RB; Brown HR; Dolan RJ; Bestmann S; Galea JM
    PLoS Comput Biol; 2018 Jul; 14(7):e1006304. PubMed ID: 29979685
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Adolescents exhibit reduced Pavlovian biases on instrumental learning.
    Raab HA; Hartley CA
    Sci Rep; 2020 Sep; 10(1):15770. PubMed ID: 32978451
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The neurocognitive role of working memory load when Pavlovian motivational control affects instrumental learning.
    Park H; Doh H; Lee E; Park H; Ahn WY
    PLoS Comput Biol; 2023 Dec; 19(12):e1011692. PubMed ID: 38064498
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Acute stress selectively impairs learning to act.
    de Berker AO; Tirole M; Rutledge RB; Cross GF; Dolan RJ; Bestmann S
    Sci Rep; 2016 Jul; 6():29816. PubMed ID: 27436299
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Go and no-go learning in reward and punishment: interactions between affect and effect.
    Guitart-Masip M; Huys QJ; Fuentemilla L; Dayan P; Duzel E; Dolan RJ
    Neuroimage; 2012 Aug; 62(1):154-66. PubMed ID: 22548809
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Emotional cues reduce Pavlovian interference in feedback-based go and nogo learning.
    Vahedi J; Mundorf A; Bellebaum C; Peterburs J
    Psychol Res; 2024 Jun; 88(4):1212-1230. PubMed ID: 38483574
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Reward anticipation and punishment anticipation are instantiated in the brain via opponent mechanisms.
    Lake JI; Spielberg JM; Infantolino ZP; Crocker LD; Yee CM; Heller W; Miller GA
    Psychophysiology; 2019 Aug; 56(8):e13381. PubMed ID: 31062381
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Information about action outcomes differentially affects learning from self-determined versus imposed choices.
    Chambon V; Théro H; Vidal M; Vandendriessche H; Haggard P; Palminteri S
    Nat Hum Behav; 2020 Oct; 4(10):1067-1079. PubMed ID: 32747804
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Structural integrity of the substantia nigra and subthalamic nucleus predicts flexibility of instrumental learning in older-age individuals.
    Chowdhury R; Guitart-Masip M; Lambert C; Dolan RJ; Düzel E
    Neurobiol Aging; 2013 Oct; 34(10):2261-70. PubMed ID: 23623600
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Modulation of cognitive flexibility by reward and punishment in BALB/cJ and BALB/cByJ mice.
    Jager A; Dam SA; Van Der Mierden S; Oomen CA; Arias-Vasquez A; Buitelaar JK; Kozicz T; Glennon JC
    Behav Brain Res; 2020 Jan; 378():112294. PubMed ID: 31626850
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Differential motor learning via reward and punishment.
    Song Y; Lu S; Smiley-Oyen AL
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2020 Feb; 73(2):249-259. PubMed ID: 31382855
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Reward and punishment enhance motor adaptation in stroke.
    Quattrocchi G; Greenwood R; Rothwell JC; Galea JM; Bestmann S
    J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry; 2017 Sep; 88(9):730-736. PubMed ID: 28377451
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Dorsal striatal dopamine D1 receptor availability predicts an instrumental bias in action learning.
    de Boer L; Axelsson J; Chowdhury R; Riklund K; Dolan RJ; Nyberg L; Bäckman L; Guitart-Masip M
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2019 Jan; 116(1):261-270. PubMed ID: 30563856
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The dissociable effects of punishment and reward on motor learning.
    Galea JM; Mallia E; Rothwell J; Diedrichsen J
    Nat Neurosci; 2015 Apr; 18(4):597-602. PubMed ID: 25706473
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Differential, but not opponent, effects of L -DOPA and citalopram on action learning with reward and punishment.
    Guitart-Masip M; Economides M; Huys QJ; Frank MJ; Chowdhury R; Duzel E; Dayan P; Dolan RJ
    Psychopharmacology (Berl); 2014 Mar; 231(5):955-66. PubMed ID: 24232442
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Adolescents flexibly adapt action selection based on controllability inferences.
    Raab HA; Goldway N; Foord C; Hartley CA
    Learn Mem; 2024 Mar; 31(3):. PubMed ID: 38527752
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Catecholaminergic challenge uncovers distinct Pavlovian and instrumental mechanisms of motivated (in)action.
    Swart JC; Froböse MI; Cook JL; Geurts DE; Frank MJ; Cools R; den Ouden HE
    Elife; 2017 May; 6():. PubMed ID: 28504638
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.