These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

162 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32937255)

  • 21. Developmental validation of STRmix™, expert software for the interpretation of forensic DNA profiles.
    Bright JA; Taylor D; McGovern C; Cooper S; Russell L; Abarno D; Buckleton J
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2016 Jul; 23():226-239. PubMed ID: 27235797
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Statistefix 4.0: A novel probabilistic software tool.
    Schmidt M; Schiller R; Anslinger K; Wiegand P; Weirich V
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2021 Nov; 55():102570. PubMed ID: 34474323
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Developmental validation of the MiSeq FGx Forensic Genomics System for Targeted Next Generation Sequencing in Forensic DNA Casework and Database Laboratories.
    Jäger AC; Alvarez ML; Davis CP; Guzmán E; Han Y; Way L; Walichiewicz P; Silva D; Pham N; Caves G; Bruand J; Schlesinger F; Pond SJK; Varlaro J; Stephens KM; Holt CL
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2017 May; 28():52-70. PubMed ID: 28171784
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Validation of probabilistic genotyping software for use in forensic DNA casework: Definitions and illustrations.
    Haned H; Gill P; Lohmueller K; Inman K; Rudin N
    Sci Justice; 2016 Mar; 56(2):104-8. PubMed ID: 26976468
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. An assessment of the information content of likelihood ratios derived from complex mixtures.
    Marsden CD; Rudin N; Inman K; Lohmueller KE
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2016 May; 22():64-72. PubMed ID: 26851613
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Interpreting a major component from a mixed DNA profile with an unknown number of minor contributors.
    Bille T; Weitz S; Buckleton JS; Bright JA
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2019 May; 40():150-159. PubMed ID: 30844683
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. NIST interlaboratory studies involving DNA mixtures (MIX13): A modern analysis.
    Buckleton JS; Bright JA; Cheng K; Budowle B; Coble MD
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2018 Nov; 37():172-179. PubMed ID: 30176439
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Euroforgen-NoE collaborative exercise on LRmix to demonstrate standardization of the interpretation of complex DNA profiles.
    Prieto L; Haned H; Mosquera A; Crespillo M; Alemañ M; Aler M; Alvarez F; Baeza-Richer C; Dominguez A; Doutremepuich C; Farfán MJ; Fenger-Grøn M; García-Ganivet JM; González-Moya E; Hombreiro L; Lareu MV; Martínez-Jarreta B; Merigioli S; Milans Del Bosch P; Morling N; Muñoz-Nieto M; Ortega-González E; Pedrosa S; Pérez R; Solís C; Yurrebaso I; Gill P
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2014 Mar; 9():47-54. PubMed ID: 24528579
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Comparing multiple POI to DNA mixtures.
    Hicks T; Kerr Z; Pugh S; Bright JA; Curran J; Taylor D; Buckleton J
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2021 May; 52():102481. PubMed ID: 33607394
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. An examination of STR nomenclatures, filters and models for MPS mixture interpretation.
    Bleka Ø; Just R; Le J; Gill P
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2020 Sep; 48():102319. PubMed ID: 32563046
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Validating TrueAllele
    Bauer DW; Butt N; Hornyak JM; Perlin MW
    J Forensic Sci; 2020 Mar; 65(2):380-398. PubMed ID: 31580496
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Probabilistic genotyping software: An overview.
    Coble MD; Bright JA
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2019 Jan; 38():219-224. PubMed ID: 30458407
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. A comparison of likelihood ratios obtained from EuroForMix and STRmix™.
    Cheng K; Bleka Ø; Gill P; Curran J; Bright JA; Taylor D; Buckleton J
    J Forensic Sci; 2021 Nov; 66(6):2138-2155. PubMed ID: 34553371
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. CEESIt: A computational tool for the interpretation of STR mixtures.
    Swaminathan H; Garg A; Grgicak CM; Medard M; Lun DS
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2016 May; 22():149-160. PubMed ID: 26946255
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. DNA mixtures interpretation - A proof-of-concept multi-software comparison highlighting different probabilistic methods' performances on challenging samples.
    Alladio E; Omedei M; Cisana S; D'Amico G; Caneparo D; Vincenti M; Garofano P
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2018 Nov; 37():143-150. PubMed ID: 30173123
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Compound and Conditioned Likelihood Ratio Behavior within a Probabilistic Genotyping Context.
    Duke K; Cuenca D; Myers S; Wallin J
    Genes (Basel); 2022 Nov; 13(11):. PubMed ID: 36360267
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. An Investigation into Compound Likelihood Ratios for Forensic DNA Mixtures.
    Wivell R; Kelly H; Kokoszka J; Daniels J; Dickson L; Buckleton J; Bright JA
    Genes (Basel); 2023 Mar; 14(3):. PubMed ID: 36980986
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Validation of a top-down DNA profile analysis for database searching using a fully continuous probabilistic genotyping model.
    Taylor D; Bright JA; Scandrett L; Abarno D; Lee SI; Wivell R; Kelly H; Buckleton J
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2021 May; 52():102479. PubMed ID: 33588348
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Establishing the Limits of TrueAllele® Casework: A Validation Study.
    Greenspoon SA; Schiermeier-Wood L; Jenkins BC
    J Forensic Sci; 2015 Sep; 60(5):1263-76. PubMed ID: 26258391
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Complex DNA mixture analysis in a forensic context: evaluating the probative value using a likelihood ratio model.
    Haned H; Benschop CCG; Gill PD; Sijen T
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2015 May; 16():17-25. PubMed ID: 25485478
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.