These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

214 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32938448)

  • 1. Interviews with experts in rare diseases for the development of clinical decision support system software - a qualitative study.
    Schaaf J; Prokosch HU; Boeker M; Schaefer J; Vasseur J; Storf H; Sedlmayr M
    BMC Med Inform Decis Mak; 2020 Sep; 20(1):230. PubMed ID: 32938448
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Evaluation of a clinical decision support system for rare diseases: a qualitative study.
    Schaaf J; Sedlmayr M; Sedlmayr B; Prokosch HU; Storf H
    BMC Med Inform Decis Mak; 2021 Feb; 21(1):65. PubMed ID: 33602191
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The Status Quo of Rare Diseases Centres for the Development of a Clinical Decision Support System - A Cross-Sectional Study.
    Schaaf J; Sedlmayr M; Prokosch HU; Ganslandt T; Schade-Brittinger C; von Wagner M; Kadioglu D; Schubert K; Lee-Kirsch MA; Kraemer BK; Winner B; Mueller T; Schaefer JR; Wagner TOF; Bruckner-Tuderman L; Tuescher O; Boeker M; Storf H
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2020 Jun; 271():176-183. PubMed ID: 32578561
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Diagnosis of Rare Diseases: a scoping review of clinical decision support systems.
    Schaaf J; Sedlmayr M; Schaefer J; Storf H
    Orphanet J Rare Dis; 2020 Sep; 15(1):263. PubMed ID: 32972444
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Clinicians' roles and necessary levels of understanding in the use of artificial intelligence: A qualitative interview study with German medical students.
    Funer F; Tinnemeyer S; Liedtke W; Salloch S
    BMC Med Ethics; 2024 Oct; 25(1):107. PubMed ID: 39375660
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Factors determining the adherence to antimicrobial guidelines and the adoption of computerised decision support systems by physicians: A qualitative study in three European hospitals.
    Catho G; Centemero NS; Catho H; Ranzani A; Balmelli C; Landelle C; Zanichelli V; Huttner BD;
    Int J Med Inform; 2020 Sep; 141():104233. PubMed ID: 32736330
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Clinician views on how clinical decision support systems can help diagnose asthma in primary care: a qualitative study.
    Daines L; Donaghy E; Canny A; Murray V; Campbell L; Stonham C; Bush A; McKinstry B; Milne H; Price D; Sheikh A; Pinnock H
    J Asthma; 2024 Apr; 61(4):377-385. PubMed ID: 37934476
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. User-Centred Development of a Diagnosis Support System for Rare Diseases.
    Schaaf J; Sedlmayr M; Sedlmayr B; Storf H
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2022 May; 293():11-18. PubMed ID: 35592954
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Implementation of a Clinical Decision Support System for Antimicrobial Prescribing in Sub-Saharan Africa: Multisectoral Qualitative Study.
    Peiffer-Smadja N; Descousse S; Courrèges E; Nganbou A; Jeanmougin P; Birgand G; Lénaud S; Beaumont AL; Durand C; Delory T; Le Bel J; Bouvet E; Lariven S; D'Ortenzio E; Konaté I; Bouyou-Akotet MK; Ouedraogo AS; Kouakou GA; Poda A; Akpovo C; Lescure FX; Tanon A
    J Med Internet Res; 2024 Oct; 26():e45122. PubMed ID: 39374065
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. What hinders the uptake of computerized decision support systems in hospitals? A qualitative study and framework for implementation.
    Liberati EG; Ruggiero F; Galuppo L; Gorli M; González-Lorenzo M; Maraldi M; Ruggieri P; Polo Friz H; Scaratti G; Kwag KH; Vespignani R; Moja L
    Implement Sci; 2017 Sep; 12(1):113. PubMed ID: 28915822
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Physicians' Perspectives on AI in Clinical Decision Support Systems: Interview Study of the CURATE.AI Personalized Dose Optimization Platform.
    Vijayakumar S; Lee VV; Leong QY; Hong SJ; Blasiak A; Ho D
    JMIR Hum Factors; 2023 Oct; 10():e48476. PubMed ID: 37902825
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Patient views on asthma diagnosis and how a clinical decision support system could help: A qualitative study.
    Canny A; Donaghy E; Murray V; Campbell L; Stonham C; Bush A; McKinstry B; Milne H; Pinnock H; Daines L
    Health Expect; 2023 Feb; 26(1):307-317. PubMed ID: 36370457
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Acceptance, Barriers, and Facilitators to Implementing Artificial Intelligence-Based Decision Support Systems in Emergency Departments: Quantitative and Qualitative Evaluation.
    Fujimori R; Liu K; Soeno S; Naraba H; Ogura K; Hara K; Sonoo T; Ogura T; Nakamura K; Goto T
    JMIR Form Res; 2022 Jun; 6(6):e36501. PubMed ID: 35699995
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Clinical decision support software for management of chronic heart failure: development and evaluation.
    Leslie SJ; Hartswood M; Meurig C; McKee SP; Slack R; Procter R; Denvir MA
    Comput Biol Med; 2006 May; 36(5):495-506. PubMed ID: 15927176
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Visualization of Similar Patients in a Clinical Decision Support System for Rare Diseases - A Focus Group Study.
    Schaaf J; Sedlmayr M; Prokosch HU; Tegtbauer N; Kadioglu D; Schaefer J; Boeker M; Storf H
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2021 May; 278():49-57. PubMed ID: 34042875
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Improving computerized decision support system interventions: a qualitative study combining the theoretical domains framework with the GUIDES Checklist.
    Yamada J; Kouri A; Simard SN; Lam Shin Cheung J; Segovia S; Gupta S
    BMC Med Inform Decis Mak; 2023 Oct; 23(1):226. PubMed ID: 37853386
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Applying the Non-Adoption, Abandonment, Scale-up, Spread, and Sustainability Framework Across Implementation Stages to Identify Key Strategies to Facilitate Clinical Decision Support System Integration Within a Large Metropolitan Health Service: Interview and Focus Group Study.
    Fernando M; Abell B; McPhail SM; Tyack Z; Tariq A; Naicker S
    JMIR Med Inform; 2024 Oct; 12():e60402. PubMed ID: 39419497
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Development of a prototype clinical decision support tool for osteoporosis disease management: a qualitative study of focus groups.
    Kastner M; Li J; Lottridge D; Marquez C; Newton D; Straus SE
    BMC Med Inform Decis Mak; 2010 Jul; 10():40. PubMed ID: 20650007
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Mixed-methods approach to understanding clinician macrocognition in the design of a clinical decision support tool: a study protocol.
    Assadi A; Laussen P; Trbovich P
    BMJ Open; 2020 Mar; 10(3):e035313. PubMed ID: 32213525
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. User perspectives on an electronic decision-support tool performing comprehensive medication reviews - a focus group study with physicians and nurses.
    Koskela T; Sandström S; Mäkinen J; Liira H
    BMC Med Inform Decis Mak; 2016 Jan; 16():6. PubMed ID: 26801630
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.