These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

214 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32938448)

  • 21. A Conceptual Framework for Decision-making Support in Uncertainty- and Risk-based Diagnosis of Rare Clinical Cases by Specialist Physicians.
    Santos AA; Moura JA; de Araújo JM
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2015; 216():857-61. PubMed ID: 26262173
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Paving the Way for the Implementation of a Decision Support System for Antibiotic Prescribing in Primary Care in West Africa: Preimplementation and Co-Design Workshop With Physicians.
    Peiffer-Smadja N; Poda A; Ouedraogo AS; Guiard-Schmid JB; Delory T; Le Bel J; Bouvet E; Lariven S; Jeanmougin P; Ahmad R; Lescure FX
    J Med Internet Res; 2020 Jul; 22(7):e17940. PubMed ID: 32442155
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. A hybrid hierarchical decision support system for cardiac surgical intensive care patients. Part II. Clinical implementation and evaluation.
    Ross JJ; Denaï MA; Mahfouf M
    Artif Intell Med; 2009 Jan; 45(1):53-62. PubMed ID: 19112011
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Finding the Needle in the Hay Stack: An Open Architecture to Support Diagnosis of Undiagnosed Patients.
    Schaaf J; Boeker M; Ganslandt T; Haverkamp C; Hermann T; Kadioglu D; Prokosch HU; Wagner TOF; von Wagner M; Schaefer J; Sedlmayr M; Storf H
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2019 Aug; 264():1580-1581. PubMed ID: 31438241
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. A Clinical Decision Support System for Sleep Staging Tasks With Explanations From Artificial Intelligence: User-Centered Design and Evaluation Study.
    Hwang J; Lee T; Lee H; Byun S
    J Med Internet Res; 2022 Jan; 24(1):e28659. PubMed ID: 35044311
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Barriers and facilitators to the uptake of computerized clinical decision support systems in specialty hospitals: protocol for a qualitative cross-sectional study.
    Moja L; Liberati EG; Galuppo L; Gorli M; Maraldi M; Nanni O; Rigon G; Ruggieri P; Ruggiero F; Scaratti G; Vaona A; Kwag KH
    Implement Sci; 2014 Aug; 9():105. PubMed ID: 25163794
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Registered Nurses' experiences of using a clinical decision support system for triage of emergency calls: A qualitative interview study.
    Holmström IK; Kaminsky E; Lindberg Y; Spangler D; Winblad U
    J Adv Nurs; 2020 Nov; 76(11):3104-3112. PubMed ID: 32924138
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Clinician involvement in research on machine learning-based predictive clinical decision support for the hospital setting: A scoping review.
    Schwartz JM; Moy AJ; Rossetti SC; Elhadad N; Cato KD
    J Am Med Inform Assoc; 2021 Mar; 28(3):653-663. PubMed ID: 33325504
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. An Electronic Clinical Decision Support System for the Assessment and Management of Suicidality in Primary Care: Protocol for a Mixed-Methods Study.
    Horrocks M; Michail M; Aubeeluck A; Wright N; Morriss R
    JMIR Res Protoc; 2018 Dec; 7(12):e11135. PubMed ID: 30530459
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Barriers and facilitators to the use of computer-based intensive insulin therapy.
    Campion TR; Waitman LR; Lorenzi NM; May AK; Gadd CS
    Int J Med Inform; 2011 Dec; 80(12):863-71. PubMed ID: 22019280
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. What may help or hinder the implementation of computerized decision support systems (CDSSs): a focus group study with physicians.
    Varonen H; Kortteisto T; Kaila M;
    Fam Pract; 2008 Jun; 25(3):162-7. PubMed ID: 18504253
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Prescriber perceptions of medication-related computerized decision support systems in hospitals: A synthesis of qualitative research.
    Van Dort BA; Zheng WY; Baysari MT
    Int J Med Inform; 2019 Sep; 129():285-295. PubMed ID: 31445268
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Iterative Development and Evaluation of a Pharmacogenomic-Guided Clinical Decision Support System for Warfarin Dosing.
    Melton BL; Zillich AJ; Saleem J; Russ AL; Tisdale JE; Overholser BR
    Appl Clin Inform; 2016 Nov; 7(4):1088-1106. PubMed ID: 27878205
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Can clinical decision support systems be an asset in medical education? An experimental approach.
    Kafke SD; Kuhlmey A; Schuster J; Blüher S; Czimmeck C; Zoellick JC; Grosse P
    BMC Med Educ; 2023 Aug; 23(1):570. PubMed ID: 37568144
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Factors Influencing Clinician Trust in Predictive Clinical Decision Support Systems for In-Hospital Deterioration: Qualitative Descriptive Study.
    Schwartz JM; George M; Rossetti SC; Dykes PC; Minshall SR; Lucas E; Cato KD
    JMIR Hum Factors; 2022 May; 9(2):e33960. PubMed ID: 35550304
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Evaluating and Enhancing the Fitness-for-Purpose of Electronic Health Record Data: Qualitative Study on Current Practices and Pathway to an Automated Approach Within the Medical Informatics for Research and Care in University Medicine Consortium.
    Kamdje Wabo G; Moorthy P; Siegel F; Seuchter SA; Ganslandt T
    JMIR Med Inform; 2024 Aug; 12():e57153. PubMed ID: 39158950
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Development of the ADFICE_IT clinical decision support system to assist deprescribing of fall-risk increasing drugs: A user-centered design approach.
    Groos SS; de Wildt KK; van de Loo B; Linn AJ; Medlock S; Shaw KM; Herman EK; Seppala LJ; Ploegmakers KJ; van Schoor NM; van Weert JCM; van der Velde N
    PLoS One; 2024; 19(9):e0297703. PubMed ID: 39236057
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. [Barriers and facilitators to the implementation of computerized decision support systems in Italian hospitals: a grounded theory study].
    Liberati EG; Galuppo L; Gorli M; Maraldi M; Ruggiero F; Capobussi M; Banzi R; Kwag K; Scaratti G; Nanni O; Ruggieri P; Polo Friz H; Cimminiello C; Bosio M; Mangia M; Moja L
    Recenti Prog Med; 2015 Apr; 106(4):180-91. PubMed ID: 25959891
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Feasibility study of a clinical decision support system for the management of multimorbid seniors in primary care: study protocol.
    Weltermann B; Kersting C
    Pilot Feasibility Stud; 2016; 2():16. PubMed ID: 27965836
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Are physicians ready for precision antibiotic prescribing? A qualitative analysis of the acceptance of artificial intelligence-enabled clinical decision support systems in India and Singapore.
    Huang Z; George MM; Tan YR; Natarajan K; Devasagayam E; Tay E; Manesh A; Varghese GM; Abraham OC; Zachariah A; Yap P; Lall D; Chow A
    J Glob Antimicrob Resist; 2023 Dec; 35():76-85. PubMed ID: 37640155
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.