149 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32938592)
1. Surgical trends, outcomes and disparities in minimal invasive surgery for patients with endometrial cancer in England: a retrospective cohort study.
Moss EL; Morgan G; Martin AP; Sarhanis P; Ind T
BMJ Open; 2020 Sep; 10(9):e036222. PubMed ID: 32938592
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Economic evaluation of different routes of surgery for the management of endometrial cancer: a retrospective cohort study.
Moss EL; Morgan G; Martin A; Sarhanis P; Ind T
BMJ Open; 2021 May; 11(5):e045888. PubMed ID: 33986058
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Minimally Invasive Surgery Rate as a Quality Metric for Endometrial Cancer.
Polan RM; Tanner EJ; Barber EL
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2020; 27(6):1389-1394. PubMed ID: 31655129
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Minimally invasive hysterectomy surgery rates for endometrial cancer performed at National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) Centers.
Bergstrom J; Aloisi A; Armbruster S; Yen TT; Casarin J; Leitao MM; Tanner EJ; Matsuno R; Machado KK; Dowdy SC; Soliman PT; Wethington SL; Stone RL; Levinson KL; Fader AN
Gynecol Oncol; 2018 Mar; 148(3):480-484. PubMed ID: 29338923
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparison of Minimally Invasive Surgery with Open Surgery for Type II Endometrial Cancer: An Analysis of the National Cancer Database.
Zhang Q; Silver M; Chen YJ; Wolf J; Hayek J; Alagkiozidis I
Healthcare (Basel); 2023 Dec; 11(24):. PubMed ID: 38132012
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The trend towards minimally invasive surgery (MIS) for endometrial cancer: an ACS-NSQIP evaluation of surgical outcomes.
Scalici J; Laughlin BB; Finan MA; Wang B; Rocconi RP
Gynecol Oncol; 2015 Mar; 136(3):512-5. PubMed ID: 25462206
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Minimally Invasive Approach in Type II Endometrial Cancer: Is It Wise and Safe?
Monterossi G; Ghezzi F; Vizza E; Zannoni GF; Uccella S; Corrado G; Restaino S; Quagliozzi L; Casarin J; Dinoi G; Scambia G; Fanfani F
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2017; 24(3):438-445. PubMed ID: 28065812
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Adoption of Minimally Invasive Surgery and Decrease in Surgical Morbidity for Endometrial Cancer Treatment in the United States.
Casarin J; Multinu F; Ubl DS; Dowdy SC; Cliby WA; Glaser GE; Butler KA; Ghezzi F; Habermann EB; Mariani A
Obstet Gynecol; 2018 Feb; 131(2):304-311. PubMed ID: 29324598
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Trend and characteristics of minimally invasive surgery for patients with endometrial cancer in Japan.
Yoshida H; Machida H; Matsuo K; Terai Y; Fujii T; Mandai M; Kawana K; Kobayashi H; Mikami M; Nagase S
J Gynecol Oncol; 2023 May; 34(3):e56. PubMed ID: 36929580
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Disparities in Surgical Care Among Women With Endometrial Cancer.
Mannschreck D; Matsuno RK; Moriarty JP; Borah BJ; Dowdy SC; Tanner EJ; Makary MA; Stone RL; Levinson KL; Temkin SM; Fader AN
Obstet Gynecol; 2016 Sep; 128(3):526-34. PubMed ID: 27500330
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Effect of minimally invasive surgery on the risk for surgical site infections: results from the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) Database.
Gandaglia G; Ghani KR; Sood A; Meyers JR; Sammon JD; Schmid M; Varda B; Briganti A; Montorsi F; Sun M; Menon M; Kibel AS; Trinh QD
JAMA Surg; 2014 Oct; 149(10):1039-44. PubMed ID: 25143176
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Is the use of minimally invasive fusion technologies associated with improved outcomes after elective interbody lumbar fusion? Analysis of a nationwide prospective patient-reported outcomes registry.
McGirt MJ; Parker SL; Mummaneni P; Knightly J; Pfortmiller D; Foley K; Asher AL
Spine J; 2017 Jul; 17(7):922-932. PubMed ID: 28254672
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Minimally invasive colectomy is associated with reduced risk of anastomotic leak and other major perioperative complications and reduced hospital resource utilization as compared with open surgery: a retrospective population-based study of comparative effectiveness and trends of surgical approach.
Wei D; Johnston S; Goldstein L; Nagle D
Surg Endosc; 2020 Feb; 34(2):610-621. PubMed ID: 31089882
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Insurance Status, Not Race, is Associated With Use of Minimally Invasive Surgical Approach for Rectal Cancer.
Turner M; Adam MA; Sun Z; Kim J; Ezekian B; Yerokun B; Mantyh C; Migaly J
Ann Surg; 2017 Apr; 265(4):774-781. PubMed ID: 27163956
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Minimally Invasive Staging Surgery in Women with Early-Stage Endometrial Cancer: Analysis of the National Cancer Data Base.
Bregar AJ; Melamed A; Diver E; Clemmer JT; Uppal S; Schorge JO; Rice LW; Del Carmen MG; Rauh-Hain JA
Ann Surg Oncol; 2017 Jun; 24(6):1677-1687. PubMed ID: 28074326
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Inequalities in access to minimally invasive general surgery: a comprehensive nationwide analysis across 20 years.
Schneider MA; Gero D; Müller M; Horisberger K; Rickenbacher A; Turina M
Surg Endosc; 2021 Nov; 35(11):6227-6243. PubMed ID: 33206242
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Nationwide Introduction of Minimally Invasive Robotic Surgery for Early-Stage Endometrial Cancer and Its Association With Severe Complications.
Jørgensen SL; Mogensen O; Wu C; Lund K; Iachina M; Korsholm M; Jensen PT
JAMA Surg; 2019 Jun; 154(6):530-538. PubMed ID: 30810740
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Recurrence and Survival Rates of Patients Who Undergo Minimally Invasive Surgery for Endometrial Carcinoma with Different Prognostic Risk Groups.
Liu B; Lin J; Liu W; Chen W; Lin W; Chen W
J Invest Surg; 2023 Dec; 36(1):1-10. PubMed ID: 36341742
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Rates over time and regional variation of radical minimally invasive surgery for cervical cancer: A population based study.
Willows K; Kupets R; Diong C; Vicus D; Covens A; Gien LT
Gynecol Oncol; 2019 Aug; 154(2):338-344. PubMed ID: 31171407
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
