These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

265 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32938877)

  • 1. Biomechanical evaluation of anterior implants associated with titanium and zirconia abutments and monotype zirconia implants.
    Brandão de Holanda KA; Armini Caldas R; Amaral M; da Silva Concilio LR; Pino Vitti R
    J Prosthodont Res; 2021 Feb; 65(1):73-77. PubMed ID: 32938877
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The effect of different abutment and restorative crown materials on stress distribution in single-unit implant-supported restorations: A 3D finite element stress analysis.
    Gökçimen G; Durkan R; Deste Gökay G; Oyar P
    J Prosthodont; 2024 Jun; 33(5):497-505. PubMed ID: 37434476
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Fracture resistance of crowns cemented on titanium and zirconia implant abutments: a comparison of monolithic versus manually veneered all-ceramic systems.
    Martínez-Rus F; Ferreiroa A; Özcan M; Bartolomé JF; Pradíes G
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2012; 27(6):1448-55. PubMed ID: 23189296
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Biomechanical evaluation of 3-unit fixed partial dentures on monotype and two-piece zirconia dental implants.
    de Matos JDM; Lopes GDRS; Nakano LJN; Ramos NC; Vasconcelos JEL; Bottino MA; Tribst JPM
    Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin; 2022 Feb; 25(3):239-246. PubMed ID: 34559574
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Effect of platform connection and abutment material on stress distribution in single anterior implant-supported restorations: a nonlinear 3-dimensional finite element analysis.
    Carvalho MA; Sotto-Maior BS; Del Bel Cury AA; Pessanha Henriques GE
    J Prosthet Dent; 2014 Nov; 112(5):1096-102. PubMed ID: 24831744
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Static and dynamic stress analysis of different crown materials on a titanium base abutment in an implant-supported single crown: a 3D finite element analysis.
    Deste Gökay G; Oyar P; Gökçimen G; Durkan R
    BMC Oral Health; 2024 May; 24(1):545. PubMed ID: 38730391
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Failure Load of Monolithic Lithium Disilicate Implant-Supported Single Crowns Bonded to Ti-base Abutments versus to Customized Ceramic Abutments after Fatigue.
    Spitznagel FA; Bonfante EA; Vollmer F; Gierthmuehlen PC
    J Prosthodont; 2022 Feb; 31(2):136-146. PubMed ID: 33870577
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Effect of fatigue loading on the fracture strength and failure mode of lithium disilicate and zirconia implant abutments.
    Elsayed A; Wille S; Al-Akhali M; Kern M
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2018 Jan; 29(1):20-27. PubMed ID: 28664585
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Fracture Resistance of Titanium, Zirconia, and Ceramic-Reinforced Polyetheretherketone Implant Abutments Supporting CAD/CAM Monolithic Lithium Disilicate Ceramic Crowns After Aging.
    Atsü SS; Aksan ME; Bulut AC
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2019; 34(3):622–630. PubMed ID: 30716141
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Fracture Resistance Behaviors of Titanium-Zirconium and Zirconia Implants.
    Hanes B; Feitosa S; Phasuk K; Levon JA; Morton D; Lin WS
    J Prosthodont; 2022 Jun; 31(5):441-446. PubMed ID: 34632673
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Influences of Implant and Framework Materials on Stress Distribution: A Three-Dimensional Finite Element Analysis Study.
    Bahadirli G; Yilmaz S; Jones T; Sen D
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2018; 33(5):e117-e126. PubMed ID: 30231094
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Effect of different restorative crown and customized abutment materials on stress distribution in single implants and peripheral bone: A three-dimensional finite element analysis study.
    Kaleli N; Sarac D; Külünk S; Öztürk Ö
    J Prosthet Dent; 2018 Mar; 119(3):437-445. PubMed ID: 28645667
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Fatigue and Stress Distribution Analyses of Ceramic-Reinforced PEEK Abutments Restored with Monolithic Zirconia Crowns as an Alternative to Conventional Esthetic Abutments.
    Akan E; Velioğlu E; Çömlekoğlu ME; Çömlekoğlu MD
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2022; 37(3):533-542. PubMed ID: 35727245
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Three-dimensional finite element analysis of titanium and yttrium-stabilized zirconium dioxide abutments and implants.
    Çaglar A; Bal BT; Karakoca S; Aydın C; Yılmaz H; Sarısoy S
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2011; 26(5):961-9. PubMed ID: 22010077
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Mechanical stability of angulated zirconia abutments supporting maxillary anterior single crowns on narrow-diameter implants.
    Ma R; Yu P; Zhang Y; Xie C; Tan X; Sun J; Yu H
    Clin Oral Investig; 2023 Jan; 27(1):221-233. PubMed ID: 36161530
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Dental implant and abutment in PEEK: stress assessment in single crown retainers on anterior region.
    de Almeida MVR; Ribeiro MCO; Dos Reis-Neta GR; Vargas-Moreno VF; Gomes RS; da Silva WJ; Del Bel Cury AA; Marcello-Machado RM
    Clin Oral Investig; 2024 May; 28(6):336. PubMed ID: 38795258
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Stiffness, strength, and failure modes of implant-supported monolithic lithium disilicate crowns: influence of titanium and zirconia abutments.
    Joda T; Bürki A; Bethge S; Brägger U; Zysset P
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2015; 30(6):1272-9. PubMed ID: 26574852
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Fracture Resistance and Mode of Failure of Ceramic versus Titanium Implant Abutments and Single Implant-Supported Restorations.
    Sghaireen MG
    Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2015 Jun; 17(3):554-61. PubMed ID: 24118925
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Marginal discrepancy of monolithic and veneered all-ceramic crowns on titanium and zirconia implant abutments before and after adhesive cementation: a scanning electron microscopy analysis.
    Martinez-Rus F; Ferreiroa A; Ozcan M; Pradies G
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2013; 28(2):480-7. PubMed ID: 23527350
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Influence of zirconia abutment preparation on the fracture strength of single implant lithium disilicate crowns after chewing simulation.
    Mitsias M; Koutayas SO; Wolfart S; Kern M
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2014 Jun; 25(6):675-82. PubMed ID: 23106096
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.