292 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32939619)
1. The value of MRI contrast enhancement in biopsy decision of suspicious mammographic microcalcifications: a prospective multicenter study.
Taskin F; Kalayci CB; Tuncbilek N; Soydemir E; Kurt N; Kaya H; Aribal E
Eur Radiol; 2021 Mar; 31(3):1718-1726. PubMed ID: 32939619
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Added value of abbreviated breast magnetic resonance imaging for assessing suspicious microcalcification on screening mammography-a prospective study.
Gweon HM; Eun NL; Youk JH; Jeong J; Bae SJ; Ahn SG; Kim JA; Son EJ
Eur Radiol; 2022 Feb; 32(2):815-821. PubMed ID: 34342691
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The diagnostic sensitivity of dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging and breast-specific gamma imaging in women with calcified and non-calcified DCIS.
Kim JS; Lee SM; Cha ES
Acta Radiol; 2014 Jul; 55(6):668-75. PubMed ID: 24043881
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Contrast-enhanced breast MRI in patients with suspicious microcalcifications on mammography: results of a multicenter trial.
Bazzocchi M; Zuiani C; Panizza P; Del Frate C; Soldano F; Isola M; Sardanelli F; Giuseppetti GM; Simonetti G; Lattanzio V; Del Maschio A
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2006 Jun; 186(6):1723-32. PubMed ID: 16714666
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Contrast-enhanced MR imaging in patients with BI-RADS 3-5 microcalcifications.
Cilotti A; Iacconi C; Marini C; Moretti M; Mazzotta D; Traino C; Naccarato AG; Piagneri V; Giaconi C; Bevilacqua G; Bartolozzi C
Radiol Med; 2007 Mar; 112(2):272-86. PubMed ID: 17361370
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Atypical ductal hyperplasia: breast DCE-MRI can be used to reduce unnecessary open surgical excision.
Bertani V; Urbani M; La Grassa M; Balestreri L; Berger N; Frauenfelder T; Boss A; Marcon M
Eur Radiol; 2020 Jul; 30(7):4069-4081. PubMed ID: 32144463
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The value of DCE- MRI of the breast as a diagnostic tool in assessing amorphous calcifications in screening mammography.
Wang S; Wang H; Li Y; Lou J; Zou Q; Jiang Y; Wu F; Tang Y; Wang S
Front Oncol; 2023; 13():1151500. PubMed ID: 37182168
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Can positron emission mammography help to identify clinically significant breast cancer in women with suspicious calcifications on mammography?
Bitencourt AG; Lima EN; Macedo BR; Conrado JL; Marques EF; Chojniak R
Eur Radiol; 2017 May; 27(5):1893-1900. PubMed ID: 27585658
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Sensitivity of breast MRI for ductal carcinoma in situ appearing as microcalcifications only on mammography.
Rinaldi P; Buccheri C; Giuliani M; Bufi E; Romani M; Patrolecco F; Belli P; Bonomo L
Clin Imaging; 2016; 40(6):1207-1212. PubMed ID: 27618803
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Is breast MRI a helpful additional diagnostic test in suspicious mammographic microcalcifications?
Baltzer PAT; Bennani-Baiti B; Stöttinger A; Bumberger A; Kapetas P; Clauser P
Magn Reson Imaging; 2018 Feb; 46():70-74. PubMed ID: 29122667
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Can supplementary contrast-enhanced MRI of the breast avoid needle biopsies in suspicious microcalcifications seen on mammography? A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Fueger BJ; Clauser P; Kapetas P; Pötsch N; Helbich TH; Baltzer PAT
Breast; 2021 Apr; 56():53-60. PubMed ID: 33618160
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Assessment of BI-RADS category 4 lesions detected with screening mammography and screening US: utility of MR imaging.
Strobel K; Schrading S; Hansen NL; Barabasch A; Kuhl CK
Radiology; 2015 Feb; 274(2):343-51. PubMed ID: 25271857
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The value of dynamic contrast enhanced breast MRI in mammographically detected BI-RADS 5 microcalcifications.
Houserkova D; Prasad SN; Svach I; Kucerova L; Duskova M; Bucil J; Sisola I; Zlamalova N; Svebisova H
Biomed Pap Med Fac Univ Palacky Olomouc Czech Repub; 2008 Jun; 152(1):107-15. PubMed ID: 18795084
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Predictive values of BI-RADS(®) magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in the detection of breast ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS).
Badan GM; Piato S; Roveda D; de Faria Castro Fleury E
Eur J Radiol; 2016 Oct; 85(10):1701-1707. PubMed ID: 27666605
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Breast MRI as a Problem-solving Study in the Evaluation of BI-RADS Categories 3 and 4 Microcalcifications: Is it Worth Performing?
Shimauchi A; Machida Y; Maeda I; Fukuma E; Hoshi K; Tozaki M
Acad Radiol; 2018 Mar; 25(3):288-296. PubMed ID: 29191685
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Low-Risk Women with Suspicious Microcalcifications in Mammography-Can an Additional Breast MRI Reduce the Biopsy Rate?
Pöschke P; Wenkel E; Hack CC; Beckmann MW; Uder M; Ohlmeyer S
Diagnostics (Basel); 2023 Mar; 13(6):. PubMed ID: 36980504
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Breast US in patients who had microcalcifications with low concern of malignancy on screening mammography.
Kang SS; Ko EY; Han BK; Shin JH
Eur J Radiol; 2008 Aug; 67(2):285-291. PubMed ID: 17703906
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging in screening detected microcalcification lesions of the breast: is there any value?
Uematsu T; Yuen S; Kasami M; Uchida Y
Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2007 Jul; 103(3):269-81. PubMed ID: 17063274
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Contrast-enhanced mammography for the assessment of screening recalls: a two-centre study.
Cozzi A; Schiaffino S; Fanizza M; Magni V; Menicagli L; Monaco CG; Benedek A; Spinelli D; Di Leo G; Di Giulio G; Sardanelli F
Eur Radiol; 2022 Nov; 32(11):7388-7399. PubMed ID: 35648209
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. MRI and comparison mammography: a worthy diagnostic alliance for breast microcalcifications?
Brnic D; Brnic D; Simundic I; Vanjaka Rogosic L; Tadic T
Acta Radiol; 2016 Apr; 57(4):413-21. PubMed ID: 25995311
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
