106 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32940790)
21. Effect of Laparoscopic-Assisted Resection vs Open Resection of Stage II or III Rectal Cancer on Pathologic Outcomes: The ACOSOG Z6051 Randomized Clinical Trial.
Fleshman J; Branda M; Sargent DJ; Boller AM; George V; Abbas M; Peters WR; Maun D; Chang G; Herline A; Fichera A; Mutch M; Wexner S; Whiteford M; Marks J; Birnbaum E; Margolin D; Larson D; Marcello P; Posner M; Read T; Monson J; Wren SM; Pisters PW; Nelson H
JAMA; 2015 Oct; 314(13):1346-55. PubMed ID: 26441179
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Does robotic rectal cancer surgery offer improved early postoperative outcomes?
Scarpinata R; Aly EH
Dis Colon Rectum; 2013 Feb; 56(2):253-62. PubMed ID: 23303155
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Laparoscopic versus open surgery for rectosigmoid and rectal cancer.
Sahakitrungruang C; Pattana-arun J; Tantiphlachiva K; Rojanasakul A
J Med Assoc Thai; 2005 Sep; 88 Suppl 4():S59-64. PubMed ID: 16623004
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Laparoscopic lateral pelvic lymph node dissection is achievable and offers advantages as a minimally invasive surgery over the open approach.
Nagayoshi K; Ueki T; Manabe T; Moriyama T; Yanai K; Oda Y; Tanaka M
Surg Endosc; 2016 May; 30(5):1938-47. PubMed ID: 26275538
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Challenge or opportunity: outcomes of laparoscopic resection for rectal cancer in patients with high operative risk.
Lu AG; Zhao XW; Mao ZH; Han DP; Zhao JK; Wang P; Zhang Z; Zong YP; Thasler W; Feng H
J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A; 2014 Nov; 24(11):756-61. PubMed ID: 25376002
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Improving conventional recovery with enhanced recovery in minimally invasive surgery for rectal cancer.
Khreiss W; Huebner M; Cima RR; Dozois ER; Chua HK; Pemberton JH; Harmsen WS; Larson DW
Dis Colon Rectum; 2014 May; 57(5):557-63. PubMed ID: 24819094
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Intersphincteric resection for low rectal cancer: laparoscopic vs open surgery approach.
Laurent C; Paumet T; Leblanc F; Denost Q; Rullier E
Colorectal Dis; 2012 Jan; 14(1):35-41; discussion 42-3. PubMed ID: 21114752
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Postoperative morbidity and mortality after mesorectal excision with laparoscopic versus conventional open lateral lymph node dissection for advanced rectal cancer: A meta-analysis.
Du R; Zhou J; Li D; Zhang Q; Liu J; Ma C; Wang L; Wang D
Asian J Surg; 2021 Jan; 44(1):26-35. PubMed ID: 32798083
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Diverting ileostomy in laparoscopic rectal cancer surgery: high price of protection.
Ihnát P; Guňková P; Peteja M; Vávra P; Pelikán A; Zonča P
Surg Endosc; 2016 Nov; 30(11):4809-4816. PubMed ID: 26902615
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Case-matched study of short-term effects of 3D vs 2D laparoscopic radical resection of rectal cancer.
Zeng Q; Lei F; Gao Z; Wang Y; Gao QK
World J Surg Oncol; 2017 Sep; 15(1):178. PubMed ID: 28938898
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Comparison of short-term surgical results of single-port and multi-port laparoscopic rectal resection for rectal cancer.
Tei M; Wakasugi M; Akamatsu H
Am J Surg; 2015 Aug; 210(2):309-14. PubMed ID: 25910886
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Should radical surgery for rectal cancer be offered to elderly population? A propensity-matching analysis on short- and long-term outcomes.
Tamini N; Giani A; Famularo S; Montuori M; Giardini V; Gianotti L
Updates Surg; 2020 Sep; 72(3):801-809. PubMed ID: 32036561
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Challenges of improving outcomes of rectal cancer surgery in obese patients.
Shukla PJ; Makino T; Trencheva K; Milsom JW
J Am Coll Surg; 2011 Jan; 212(1):130; author reply 130-1. PubMed ID: 21184959
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
34. Hand-assisted laparoscopic colon and rectal cancer surgery: feasibility, short-term, and oncological outcomes.
Pendlimari R; Holubar SD; Pattan-Arun J; Larson DW; Dozois EJ; Pemberton JH; Cima RR
Surgery; 2010 Aug; 148(2):378-85. PubMed ID: 20633732
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Comparison of perioperative clinicopathologic outcome and postoperative survival of laparoscopic and open sphincter-sparing surgery in patients with rectal cancer: a retrospective study.
Zhang Z; Zhang BRZSN
J BUON; 2019; 24(2):464-469. PubMed ID: 31127992
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Surgical outcomes of laparoscopic vs. open surgery for rectal carcinoma--a matched case-control study.
Uehara K; Yamamoto S; Fujita S; Akasu T; Moriya Y
Hepatogastroenterology; 2006; 53(70):531-5. PubMed ID: 16995455
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Quality of total mesorectal excision and depth of circumferential resection margin in rectal cancer: a matched comparison of the first 20 robotic cases.
Barnajian M; Pettet D; Kazi E; Foppa C; Bergamaschi R
Colorectal Dis; 2014 Aug; 16(8):603-9. PubMed ID: 24750995
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. [Risk factors of postoperative urinary retention after rectal cancer surgery].
Zhao Y; Hou X; Zhao Y; Feng Y; Zhang B; Zhao K
Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2017 Mar; 20(3):295-299. PubMed ID: 28338163
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Robotic-assisted laparoscopic transanal total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer: a prospective pilot study.
Gómez Ruiz M; Parra IM; Palazuelos CM; Martín JA; Fernández CC; Diego JC; Fleitas MG
Dis Colon Rectum; 2015 Jan; 58(1):145-53. PubMed ID: 25489707
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Long-term oncologic outcomes of laparoscopic vs open surgery for stages II and III rectal cancer: A retrospective cohort study.
Zhou ZX; Zhao LY; Lin T; Liu H; Deng HJ; Zhu HL; Yan J; Li GX
World J Gastroenterol; 2015 May; 21(18):5505-12. PubMed ID: 25987773
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
