These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

104 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32940930)

  • 1. Forensic Footwear Reliability: Part II-Range of Conclusions, Accuracy, and Consensus.
    Richetelli N; Hammer L; Speir JA
    J Forensic Sci; 2020 Nov; 65(6):1871-1882. PubMed ID: 32940930
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Forensic Footwear Reliability: Part I-Participant Demographics and Examiner Agreement.
    Speir JA; Richetelli N; Hammer L
    J Forensic Sci; 2020 Nov; 65(6):1852-1870. PubMed ID: 32898292
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Accuracy, reproducibility, and repeatability of forensic footwear examiner decisions.
    Austin Hicklin R; McVicker BC; Parks C; LeMay J; Richetelli N; Smith M; Buscaglia J; Perlman RS; Peters EM; Eckenrode BA
    Forensic Sci Int; 2022 Oct; 339():111418. PubMed ID: 35987091
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Forensic Footwear Reliability: Part III-Positive Predictive Value, Error Rates, and Inter-Rater Reliability.
    Richetelli N; Hammer L; Speir JA
    J Forensic Sci; 2020 Nov; 65(6):1883-1893. PubMed ID: 32960978
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Quantitative evaluation of footwear evidence: Initial workflow for an end-to-end system.
    Venkatasubramanian G; Hegde V; Lund SP; Iyer H; Herman M
    J Forensic Sci; 2021 Nov; 66(6):2232-2251. PubMed ID: 34374992
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Repeatability and reproducibility of decisions by latent fingerprint examiners.
    Ulery BT; Hicklin RA; Buscaglia J; Roberts MA
    PLoS One; 2012; 7(3):e32800. PubMed ID: 22427888
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The application of TreadMatch scans to aid the process of footwear mark comparison.
    Reel S; Harris R; Reidy S; Chambers J
    Sci Justice; 2022 Sep; 62(5):530-539. PubMed ID: 36336446
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The impact of contextual information on decision-making in footwear examination: An eye-tracking study.
    Yu Y; Luo Y; Huang L; Quan Y
    J Forensic Sci; 2021 Nov; 66(6):2218-2231. PubMed ID: 34414574
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The Footwear Assessment Form: a reliable clinical tool to assess footwear characteristics of relevance to postural stability in older adults.
    Menz HB; Sherrington C
    Clin Rehabil; 2000 Dec; 14(6):657-64. PubMed ID: 11128742
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Portable high-resolution automated 3D imaging for footwear and tire impression capture.
    Liao YH; Hyun JS; Feller M; Bell T; Bortins I; Wolfe J; Baldwin D; Zhang S
    J Forensic Sci; 2021 Jan; 66(1):112-128. PubMed ID: 33034904
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Accuracy and reliability of forensic handwriting comparisons.
    Hicklin RA; Eisenhart L; Richetelli N; Miller MD; Belcastro P; Burkes TM; Parks CL; Smith MA; Buscaglia J; Peters EM; Perlman RS; Abonamah JV; Eckenrode BA
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2022 Aug; 119(32):e2119944119. PubMed ID: 35914157
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Empirically observed and predicted estimates of chance association: Estimating the chance association of randomly acquired characteristics in footwear comparisons.
    Richetelli N; Bodziak WJ; Speir JA
    Forensic Sci Int; 2019 Sep; 302():109833. PubMed ID: 31539827
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Quantifying randomly acquired characteristics on outsoles in terms of shape and position.
    Speir JA; Richetelli N; Fagert M; Hite M; Bodziak WJ
    Forensic Sci Int; 2016 Sep; 266():399-411. PubMed ID: 27416269
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Important features of retail shoes for women with rheumatoid arthritis: A Delphi consensus survey.
    Tehan PE; Taylor WJ; Carroll M; Dalbeth N; Rome K
    PLoS One; 2019; 14(12):e0226906. PubMed ID: 31881047
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparing footwear impressions that are close non-matches using correlation-based approaches.
    Venkatasubramanian G; Hegde V; Padi S; Iyer H; Herman M
    J Forensic Sci; 2021 May; 66(3):890-909. PubMed ID: 33682930
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Quality of Laypersons' Assessment of Forensically Relevant Stimuli.
    Sneyd D; Schreiber Compo N; Rivard J; Pena M; Stoiloff S; Hernandez G
    J Forensic Sci; 2020 Sep; 65(5):1507-1516. PubMed ID: 32628285
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Empirical Evaluation of the Reliability of Photogrammetry Software in the Recovery of Three-Dimensional Footwear Impressions.
    Larsen HJ; Bennett MR
    J Forensic Sci; 2020 Sep; 65(5):1722-1729. PubMed ID: 32407555
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The effect of image descriptors on the performance of classifiers of footwear outsole image pairs.
    Park S; Carriquiry A
    Forensic Sci Int; 2022 Feb; 331():111126. PubMed ID: 34922283
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Planning, design and logistics of a decision analysis study: The FBI/Ames study involving forensic firearms examiners.
    Monson KL; Smith ED; Bajic SJ
    Forensic Sci Int Synerg; 2022; 4():100221. PubMed ID: 35243285
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Dataset of Digitized RACs and Their Rarity Score Analysis for Strengthening Shoeprint Evidence.
    Wiesner S; Shor Y; Tsach T; Kaplan-Damary N; Yekutieli Y
    J Forensic Sci; 2020 May; 65(3):762-774. PubMed ID: 31738459
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.