602 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32941652)
21. Computational Analysis Concerning the Impact of DNA Accessibility on CRISPR-Cas9 Cleavage Efficiency.
Chung CH; Allen AG; Sullivan NT; Atkins A; Nonnemacher MR; Wigdahl B; Dampier W
Mol Ther; 2020 Jan; 28(1):19-28. PubMed ID: 31672284
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Methods for Measuring CRISPR/Cas9 DNA Cleavage in Cells.
Cromwell CR; Jovel J; Hubbard BP
Methods Mol Biol; 2021; 2162():197-213. PubMed ID: 32926384
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Gene Editing With TALEN and CRISPR/Cas in Rice.
Bi H; Yang B
Prog Mol Biol Transl Sci; 2017; 149():81-98. PubMed ID: 28712502
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Design and Validation of CRISPR/Cas9 Systems for Targeted Gene Modification in Induced Pluripotent Stem Cells.
Lee CM; Zhu H; Davis TH; Deshmukh H; Bao G
Methods Mol Biol; 2017; 1498():3-21. PubMed ID: 27709565
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. CRISPR/Cas9-based epigenome editing: An overview of dCas9-based tools with special emphasis on off-target activity.
Tadić V; Josipović G; Zoldoš V; Vojta A
Methods; 2019 Jul; 164-165():109-119. PubMed ID: 31071448
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Targeting DNA polymerase to DNA double-strand breaks reduces DNA deletion size and increases templated insertions generated by CRISPR/Cas9.
Yoo KW; Yadav MK; Song Q; Atala A; Lu B
Nucleic Acids Res; 2022 Apr; 50(7):3944-3957. PubMed ID: 35323942
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. PASTE: a high-throughput method for large DNA insertions.
Awan MJA; Mahmood MA; Naqvi RZ; Mansoor S
Trends Plant Sci; 2023 May; 28(5):509-511. PubMed ID: 36898908
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Tag-seq: a convenient and scalable method for genome-wide specificity assessment of CRISPR/Cas nucleases.
Huang H; Hu Y; Huang G; Ma S; Feng J; Wang D; Lin Y; Zhou J; Rong Z
Commun Biol; 2021 Jul; 4(1):830. PubMed ID: 34215845
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Development of an Efficient Genome Editing Tool in Bacillus licheniformis Using CRISPR-Cas9 Nickase.
Li K; Cai D; Wang Z; He Z; Chen S
Appl Environ Microbiol; 2018 Mar; 84(6):. PubMed ID: 29330178
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
30. Web-based design and analysis tools for CRISPR base editing.
Hwang GH; Park J; Lim K; Kim S; Yu J; Yu E; Kim ST; Eils R; Kim JS; Bae S
BMC Bioinformatics; 2018 Dec; 19(1):542. PubMed ID: 30587106
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Prime genome editing in rice and wheat.
Lin Q; Zong Y; Xue C; Wang S; Jin S; Zhu Z; Wang Y; Anzalone AV; Raguram A; Doman JL; Liu DR; Gao C
Nat Biotechnol; 2020 May; 38(5):582-585. PubMed ID: 32393904
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Biased and Unbiased Methods for the Detection of Off-Target Cleavage by CRISPR/Cas9: An Overview.
Martin F; Sánchez-Hernández S; Gutiérrez-Guerrero A; Pinedo-Gomez J; Benabdellah K
Int J Mol Sci; 2016 Sep; 17(9):. PubMed ID: 27618019
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Prime Editing: An Emerging Tool in Cancer Treatment.
Sen D; Sarkar S; Mukhopadhyay P
Mol Biotechnol; 2023 Apr; 65(4):509-520. PubMed ID: 36251123
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Achieving Plant CRISPR Targeting that Limits Off-Target Effects.
Wolt JD; Wang K; Sashital D; Lawrence-Dill CJ
Plant Genome; 2016 Nov; 9(3):. PubMed ID: 27902801
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Cas9-NG Greatly Expands the Targeting Scope of the Genome-Editing Toolkit by Recognizing NG and Other Atypical PAMs in Rice.
Ren B; Liu L; Li S; Kuang Y; Wang J; Zhang D; Zhou X; Lin H; Zhou H
Mol Plant; 2019 Jul; 12(7):1015-1026. PubMed ID: 30928635
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. CRISPR-cas System as a Genome Engineering Platform: Applications in Biomedicine and Biotechnology.
Hashemi A
Curr Gene Ther; 2018; 18(2):115-124. PubMed ID: 29473500
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. MagnEdit-interacting factors that recruit DNA-editing enzymes to single base targets.
McCann JL; Salamango DJ; Law EK; Brown WL; Harris RS
Life Sci Alliance; 2020 Apr; 3(4):. PubMed ID: 32094150
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Induced mutation and epigenetics modification in plants for crop improvement by targeting CRISPR/Cas9 technology.
Khan MHU; Khan SU; Muhammad A; Hu L; Yang Y; Fan C
J Cell Physiol; 2018 Jun; 233(6):4578-4594. PubMed ID: 29194606
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. A CRISPR/Cas9 Protocol for Target Gene Editing in Barley.
Jiang Q; Yang Q; Harwood W; Tang H; Wei Y; Zheng Y
Methods Mol Biol; 2023; 2653():287-296. PubMed ID: 36995633
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. CRISPR-Cas9 system: A new-fangled dawn in gene editing.
Gupta D; Bhattacharjee O; Mandal D; Sen MK; Dey D; Dasgupta A; Kazi TA; Gupta R; Sinharoy S; Acharya K; Chattopadhyay D; Ravichandiran V; Roy S; Ghosh D
Life Sci; 2019 Sep; 232():116636. PubMed ID: 31295471
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
