These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

179 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32941790)

  • 1. Salpingectomy vs tubal ligation for sterilization: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Mills K; Marchand G; Sainz K; Azadi A; Ware K; Vallejo J; Anderson S; King A; Osborn A; Ruther S; Brazil G; Cieminski K; Hopewell S; Rials L; Klipp A
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2021 Mar; 224(3):258-265.e4. PubMed ID: 32941790
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Cost-effectiveness of opportunistic salpingectomy vs tubal ligation at the time of cesarean delivery.
    Venkatesh KK; Clark LH; Stamilio DM
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2019 Jan; 220(1):106.e1-106.e10. PubMed ID: 30170036
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Effect of salpingectomy versus tubal ligation on postoperative wound infection in patients: A meta-analysis.
    Li M; Lv J
    Int Wound J; 2024 Jan; 21(1):e14543. PubMed ID: 38272821
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Postpartum Permanent Sterilization: Could Bilateral Salpingectomy Replace Bilateral Tubal Ligation?
    Danis RB; Della Badia CR; Richard SD
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2016; 23(6):928-32. PubMed ID: 27234430
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Extending the safety evidence for opportunistic salpingectomy in prevention of ovarian cancer: a cohort study from British Columbia, Canada.
    Hanley GE; Kwon JS; Finlayson SJ; Huntsman DG; Miller D; McAlpine JN
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2018 Aug; 219(2):172.e1-172.e8. PubMed ID: 29852159
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparing options for females seeking permanent contraception in high resource countries: a systematic review.
    Gormley R; Vickers B; Cheng B; Norman WV
    Reprod Health; 2021 Jul; 18(1):154. PubMed ID: 34284794
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Complete salpingectomy versus tubal ligation during cesarean section: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Yang M; Du Y; Hu Y
    J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2021 Nov; 34(22):3794-3802. PubMed ID: 31752570
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Salpingectomy, tubal ligation and hysteroscopic occlusion for sterilization.
    Marchand GJ; Masoud AT; King AK; Brazil GM; Ulibarri HM; Parise JE; Arroyo AL; Coriell CL; Goetz SP; Moir CJ; Govindan ML
    Minerva Obstet Gynecol; 2022 Oct; 74(5):452-461. PubMed ID: 35912465
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Techniques for the interruption of tubal patency for female sterilisation.
    Lawrie TA; Kulier R; Nardin JM
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2016 Aug; 2016(8):CD003034. PubMed ID: 27494193
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Techniques for the interruption of tubal patency for female sterilisation.
    Lawrie TA; Kulier R; Nardin JM
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2015 Sep; (9):CD003034. PubMed ID: 26343930
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Ovarian reserve following cesarean section with salpingectomy vs tubal ligation: a randomized trial.
    Ganer Herman H; Gluck O; Keidar R; Kerner R; Kovo M; Levran D; Bar J; Sagiv R
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2017 Oct; 217(4):472.e1-472.e6. PubMed ID: 28455082
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Risks and Benefits of Salpingectomy at the Time of Sterilization.
    Castellano T; Zerden M; Marsh L; Boggess K
    Obstet Gynecol Surv; 2017 Nov; 72(11):663-668. PubMed ID: 29164264
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Efficacy and safety of sterilisation procedures to reduce the risk of epithelial ovarian cancer: a systematic review comparing salpingectomy with tubal ligation.
    Magarakis L; Idahl A; Särnqvist C; Strandell A
    Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care; 2022 Jun; 27(3):230-239. PubMed ID: 34870544
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Paradigm shift from tubal ligation to opportunistic salpingectomy at cesarean delivery in the United States.
    Mandelbaum RS; Matsuzaki S; Sangara RN; Klar M; Matsushima K; Roman LD; Paulson RJ; Wright JD; Matsuo K
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2021 Oct; 225(4):399.e1-399.e32. PubMed ID: 34181896
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The Trend, Feasibility, and Safety of Salpingectomy as a form of Permanent Sterilization.
    Kim AJ; Barberio A; Berens P; Chen HY; Gants S; Swilinski L; Acholonu U; Chang-Jackson SC
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2019; 26(7):1363-1368. PubMed ID: 30771489
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The Role of Opportunistic Bilateral Salpingectomy vs Tubal Occlusion or Ligation for Ovarian Cancer Prophylaxis.
    Ely LK; Truong M
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2017; 24(3):371-378. PubMed ID: 28087480
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparing options for women seeking permanent contraception in high-resource countries: a protocol for a systematic review.
    Gormley R; Vickers B; Norman WV
    Syst Rev; 2019 Mar; 8(1):74. PubMed ID: 30914067
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Salpingectomy Compared With Tubal Ligation at Cesarean Delivery: A Randomized Controlled Trial.
    Garcia C; Moskowitz OM; Chisholm CA; Duska LR; Warren AL; Lyons GR; Pettit KE
    Obstet Gynecol; 2018 Jul; 132(1):29-34. PubMed ID: 29889755
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Salpingectomy and proximal tubal occlusion for hydrosalpinx prior to in vitro fertilization: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
    Zhang Y; Sun Y; Guo Y; Li TC; Duan H
    Obstet Gynecol Surv; 2015 Jan; 70(1):33-8. PubMed ID: 25616345
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Racial Disparities in Sterilization Procedure Performed at Time of Cesarean Section.
    Walheim LK; Hong CX; Hamm RF
    Am J Perinatol; 2024 May; 41(S 01):e934-e938. PubMed ID: 36351447
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.