These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

281 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32942137)

  • 1. Comparison of eight commercial, high-throughput, automated or ELISA assays detecting SARS-CoV-2 IgG or total antibody.
    Trabaud MA; Icard V; Milon MP; Bal A; Lina B; Escuret V
    J Clin Virol; 2020 Nov; 132():104613. PubMed ID: 32942137
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Clinical evaluation of five different automated SARS-CoV-2 serology assays in a cohort of hospitalized COVID-19 patients.
    Pflüger LS; Bannasch JH; Brehm TT; Pfefferle S; Hoffmann A; Nörz D; van der Meirschen M; Kluge S; Haddad M; Pischke S; Hiller J; Addo MM; Lohse AW; Schulze Zur Wiesch J; Peine S; Aepfelbacher M; Lütgehetmann M
    J Clin Virol; 2020 Sep; 130():104549. PubMed ID: 32763809
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparison of 16 Serological SARS-CoV-2 Immunoassays in 16 Clinical Laboratories.
    Harritshøj LH; Gybel-Brask M; Afzal S; Kamstrup PR; Jørgensen CS; Thomsen MK; Hilsted L; Friis-Hansen L; Szecsi PB; Pedersen L; Nielsen L; Hansen CB; Garred P; Korsholm TL; Mikkelsen S; Nielsen KO; Møller BK; Hansen AT; Iversen KK; Nielsen PB; Hasselbalch RB; Fogh K; Norsk JB; Kristensen JH; Schønning K; Kirkby NS; Nielsen ACY; Landsy LH; Loftager M; Holm DK; Nilsson AC; Sækmose SG; Grum-Schwensen B; Aagaard B; Jensen TG; Nielsen DM; Ullum H; Dessau RB
    J Clin Microbiol; 2021 Apr; 59(5):. PubMed ID: 33574119
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Performance of six SARS-CoV-2 immunoassays in comparison with microneutralisation.
    Jääskeläinen AJ; Kuivanen S; Kekäläinen E; Ahava MJ; Loginov R; Kallio-Kokko H; Vapalahti O; Jarva H; Kurkela S; Lappalainen M
    J Clin Virol; 2020 Aug; 129():104512. PubMed ID: 32563180
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Performance evaluation of two SARS-CoV-2 IgG/IgM rapid tests (Covid-Presto and NG-Test) and one IgG automated immunoassay (Abbott).
    Charpentier C; Ichou H; Damond F; Bouvet E; Chaix ML; Ferré V; Delaugerre C; Mahjoub N; Larrouy L; Le Hingrat Q; Visseaux B; Mackiewicz V; Descamps D; Fidouh-Houhou N
    J Clin Virol; 2020 Nov; 132():104618. PubMed ID: 32919222
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Clinical evaluation of commercial automated SARS-CoV-2 immunoassays.
    Kittel M; Muth MC; Zahn I; Roth HJ; Thiaucourt M; Gerhards C; Haselmann V; Neumaier M; Findeisen P
    Int J Infect Dis; 2021 Feb; 103():590-596. PubMed ID: 33310108
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Performance of three automated SARS-CoV-2 antibody assays and relevance of orthogonal testing algorithms.
    Huyghe E; Jansens H; Matheeussen V; Hoffbauer I; Goossens H; Peeters B
    Clin Chem Lab Med; 2020 Nov; 59(2):411-419. PubMed ID: 33554506
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Head-to-Head Comparison of Two SARS-CoV-2 Serology Assays.
    Merrill AE; Jackson JB; Ehlers A; Voss D; Krasowski MD
    J Appl Lab Med; 2020 Nov; 5(6):1351-1357. PubMed ID: 32717056
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Differences in Performance Characteristics Among Four High-Throughput Assays for the Detection of Antibodies Against SARS-CoV-2 Using a Common Set of Patient Samples.
    Manthei DM; Whalen JF; Schroeder LF; Sinay AM; Li SH; Valdez R; Giacherio DA; Gherasim C
    Am J Clin Pathol; 2021 Feb; 155(2):267-279. PubMed ID: 33033840
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Performance evaluation of five ELISA kits for detecting anti-SARS-COV-2 IgG antibodies.
    Yassine HM; Al-Jighefee H; Al-Sadeq DW; Dargham SR; Younes SN; Shurrab F; Marei RM; Hssain AA; Taleb S; Alhussain H; Al-Nesf MA; Al-Khal A; Qotba H; Althani AA; Tang P; Abu-Raddad LJ; Nasrallah GK
    Int J Infect Dis; 2021 Jan; 102():181-187. PubMed ID: 33127504
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Head-to-head comparison of two rapid high-throughput automated electrochemiluminescence immunoassays targeting total antibodies to the SARS-CoV-2 nucleoprotein and spike protein receptor binding domain.
    Poljak M; Oštrbenk Valenčak A; Štamol T; Seme K
    J Clin Virol; 2021 Apr; 137():104784. PubMed ID: 33711693
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Performance evaluation of Abbott ARCHITECT SARS-CoV-2 IgG immunoassay in comparison with indirect immunofluorescence and virus microneutralization test.
    Meschi S; Colavita F; Bordi L; Matusali G; Lapa D; Amendola A; Vairo F; Ippolito G; Capobianchi MR; Castilletti C;
    J Clin Virol; 2020 Aug; 129():104539. PubMed ID: 32679298
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Evaluation of four commercial, fully automated SARS-CoV-2 antibody tests suggests a revision of the Siemens SARS-CoV-2 IgG assay.
    Irsara C; Egger AE; Prokop W; Nairz M; Loacker L; Sahanic S; Pizzini A; Sonnweber T; Mayer W; Schennach H; Loeffler-Ragg J; Bellmann-Weiler R; Tancevski I; Weiss G; Anliker M; Griesmacher A; Hoermann G
    Clin Chem Lab Med; 2021 May; 59(6):1143-1154. PubMed ID: 33554557
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Performance Characteristics of Four High-Throughput Immunoassays for Detection of IgG Antibodies against SARS-CoV-2.
    Theel ES; Harring J; Hilgart H; Granger D
    J Clin Microbiol; 2020 Jul; 58(8):. PubMed ID: 32513859
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Evaluation of 3 SARS-CoV-2 IgG Antibody Assays and Correlation with Neutralizing Antibodies.
    Rychert J; Couturier MR; Elgort M; Lozier BK; La'ulu S; Genzen JR; Straseski JA; Delgado JC; Slev PR
    J Appl Lab Med; 2021 Apr; 6(3):614-624. PubMed ID: 33064790
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Assessment of SARS-CoV-2 serological tests for the diagnosis of COVID-19 through the evaluation of three immunoassays: Two automated immunoassays (Euroimmun and Abbott) and one rapid lateral flow immunoassay (NG Biotech).
    Nicol T; Lefeuvre C; Serri O; Pivert A; Joubaud F; Dubée V; Kouatchet A; Ducancelle A; Lunel-Fabiani F; Le Guillou-Guillemette H
    J Clin Virol; 2020 Aug; 129():104511. PubMed ID: 32593133
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A Cell-Based ELISA to Improve the Serological Analysis of Anti-SARS-CoV-2 IgG.
    Zarletti G; Tiberi M; De Molfetta V; Bossù M; Toppi E; Bossù P; Scapigliati G
    Viruses; 2020 Nov; 12(11):. PubMed ID: 33171590
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparison of four high-throughput, automated immunoassays for the detection of SARS-CoV-2 antibodies.
    Oakey J; Haslam S; Brown A; Eglin J; Houghton B; Singleton D
    Ann Clin Biochem; 2021 Sep; 58(5):487-495. PubMed ID: 33892600
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comparison of the Elecsys® Anti-SARS-CoV-2 immunoassay with the EDI™ enzyme linked immunosorbent assays for the detection of SARS-CoV-2 antibodies in human plasma.
    Egger M; Bundschuh C; Wiesinger K; Gabriel C; Clodi M; Mueller T; Dieplinger B
    Clin Chim Acta; 2020 Oct; 509():18-21. PubMed ID: 32485155
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Evaluation of Two Chemiluminescent and Three ELISA Immunoassays for the Detection of SARS-CoV-2 IgG Antibodies: Implications for Disease Diagnosis and Patients' Management.
    Speletas M; Kyritsi MA; Vontas A; Theodoridou A; Chrysanthidis T; Hatzianastasiou S; Petinaki E; Hadjichristodoulou C
    Front Immunol; 2020; 11():609242. PubMed ID: 33424863
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 15.