BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

185 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32942729)

  • 1. Value of Shape and Texture Features from
    Palumbo B; Bianconi F; Palumbo I; Fravolini ML; Minestrini M; Nuvoli S; Stazza ML; Rondini M; Spanu A
    Diagnostics (Basel); 2020 Sep; 10(9):. PubMed ID: 32942729
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Using neighborhood gray tone difference matrix texture features on dual time point PET/CT images to differentiate malignant from benign FDG-avid solitary pulmonary nodules.
    Chen S; Harmon S; Perk T; Li X; Chen M; Li Y; Jeraj R
    Cancer Imaging; 2019 Aug; 19(1):56. PubMed ID: 31420006
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3.
    Taralli S; Scolozzi V; Foti M; Ricciardi S; Forcione AR; Cardillo G; Calcagni ML
    Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2019 Feb; 46(2):429-436. PubMed ID: 30535767
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Radiomic analysis will add differential diagnostic value of benign and malignant pulmonary nodules: a hybrid imaging study based on [
    Ning J; Li C; Yu P; Cui J; Xu X; Jia Y; Zuo P; Tian J; Kenner L; Xu B
    Insights Imaging; 2023 Nov; 14(1):197. PubMed ID: 37980611
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Diagnostic Performance of Machine Learning Models Based on
    Salihoğlu YS; Uslu Erdemir R; Aydur Püren B; Özdemir S; Uyulan Ç; Ergüzel TT; Tekin HO
    Mol Imaging Radionucl Ther; 2022 Jun; 31(2):82-88. PubMed ID: 35770958
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Can dynamic imaging, using
    Marin A; Murchison JT; Skwarski KM; Tavares AAS; Fletcher A; Wallace WA; Salapura V; van Beek EJR; Mirsadraee S
    Radiol Oncol; 2021 May; 55(3):259-267. PubMed ID: 34051709
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Characterization of the solitary pulmonary nodule: 18F-FDG PET versus nodule-enhancement CT.
    Christensen JA; Nathan MA; Mullan BP; Hartman TE; Swensen SJ; Lowe VJ
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2006 Nov; 187(5):1361-7. PubMed ID: 17056930
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Integrating PET and CT information to improve diagnostic accuracy for lung nodules: A semiautomatic computer-aided method.
    Nie Y; Li Q; Li F; Pu Y; Appelbaum D; Doi K
    J Nucl Med; 2006 Jul; 47(7):1075-80. PubMed ID: 16818939
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Sensitivity of (18)F-FDG PET in evaluation of solitary pulmonary nodules.
    Yilmaz F; Tastekin G
    Int J Clin Exp Med; 2015; 8(1):45-51. PubMed ID: 25784973
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Role of
    Albano D; Gatta R; Marini M; Rodella C; Camoni L; Dondi F; Giubbini R; Bertagna F
    J Clin Med; 2021 Oct; 10(21):. PubMed ID: 34768584
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Diagnostic classification of solitary pulmonary nodules using dual time
    Chen S; Harmon S; Perk T; Li X; Chen M; Li Y; Jeraj R
    Sci Rep; 2017 Aug; 7(1):9370. PubMed ID: 28839156
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Diagnostic classification of solitary pulmonary nodules using support vector machine model based on 2-[18F]fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose PET/computed tomography texture features.
    Zhang J; Ma G; Cheng J; Song S; Zhang Y; Shi LQ
    Nucl Med Commun; 2020 Jun; 41(6):560-566. PubMed ID: 32282636
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI versus
    Feng F; Qiang F; Shen A; Shi D; Fu A; Li H; Zhang M; Xia G; Cao P
    Chin J Cancer Res; 2018 Feb; 30(1):21-30. PubMed ID: 29545716
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Maximum Standardized Uptake Value of
    Niu R; Gao J; Shao X; Wang J; Jiang Z; Shi Y; Zhang F; Wang Y; Shao X
    Front Oncol; 2021; 11():727094. PubMed ID: 34976790
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [
    Sollini M; Cozzi L; Pepe G; Antunovic L; Lania A; Di Tommaso L; Magnoni P; Erba PA; Kirienko M
    Eur J Hybrid Imaging; 2017; 1(1):3. PubMed ID: 29782578
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Interchangeability of radiomic features between [18F]-FDG PET/CT and [18F]-FDG PET/MR.
    Vuong D; Tanadini-Lang S; Huellner MW; Veit-Haibach P; Unkelbach J; Andratschke N; Kraft J; Guckenberger M; Bogowicz M
    Med Phys; 2019 Apr; 46(4):1677-1685. PubMed ID: 30714158
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Diagnostic efficacy of PET-FDG imaging in solitary pulmonary nodules. Potential role in evaluation and management.
    Dewan NA; Gupta NC; Redepenning LS; Phalen JJ; Frick MP
    Chest; 1993 Oct; 104(4):997-1002. PubMed ID: 8404239
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Differentiation Between Malignant and Benign Pulmonary Nodules by Using Automated Three-Dimensional High-Resolution Representation Learning With Fluorodeoxyglucose Positron Emission Tomography-Computed Tomography.
    Lai YC; Wu KC; Tseng NC; Chen YJ; Chang CJ; Yen KY; Kao CH
    Front Med (Lausanne); 2022; 9():773041. PubMed ID: 35372415
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A Combination of Shape and Texture Features for Classification of Pulmonary Nodules in Lung CT Images.
    Dhara AK; Mukhopadhyay S; Dutta A; Garg M; Khandelwal N
    J Digit Imaging; 2016 Aug; 29(4):466-75. PubMed ID: 26738871
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. 18F-FDG-PET/CT versus 99Tcm-MIBI-SPECT: which is better for detection of solitary pulmonary nodules ?
    Xia G; An C; Ming Z; Guo H; Liu L; Li Y
    J BUON; 2017; 22(5):1246-1251. PubMed ID: 29135109
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.