These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
92 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32942952)
1. Spontaneous Distractor Reactivation With Age: Evidence for Bound Target-Distractor Representations in Memory. Amer T; Ngo KWJ; Weeks JC; Hasher L Psychol Sci; 2020 Oct; 31(10):1315-1324. PubMed ID: 32942952 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The consequences of processing goal-irrelevant information during the Stroop task. Nicosia J; Balota D Psychol Aging; 2020 Aug; 35(5):663-675. PubMed ID: 32744849 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. [Inhibition and resource capacity during normal aging: a confrontation of the dorsal-ventral and frontal models in a modified version of negative priming]. Martin S; Brouillet D; Guerdoux E; Tarrago R Encephale; 2006; 32(2 Pt 1):253-62. PubMed ID: 16910627 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The role of distractor inhibition in the attentional boost effect: evidence from the R/K paradigm. Meng Y; Lin G; Lin H Memory; 2019 Jul; 27(6):750-757. PubMed ID: 30595083 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Ageing and selective inhibition of irrelevant information in an attention-demanding rapid serial visual presentation task. Walker ME; Vibell JF; Dewald AD; Sinnett S Brain Neurosci Adv; 2022; 6():23982128211073427. PubMed ID: 35097218 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Older adults encode more, not less: evidence for age-related attentional broadening. Weeks JC; Hasher L Neuropsychol Dev Cogn B Aging Neuropsychol Cogn; 2018 Jul; 25(4):576-587. PubMed ID: 28701077 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Protecting visual short-term memory during maintenance: Attentional modulation of target and distractor representations. Vissers ME; Gulbinaite R; van den Bos T; Slagter HA Sci Rep; 2017 Jun; 7(1):4061. PubMed ID: 28642613 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Irrelevant words trigger an attentional blink. Stein T; Zwickel J; Kitzmantel M; Ritter J; Schneider WX Exp Psychol; 2010; 57(4):301-7. PubMed ID: 20178947 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Mechanisms of priming of pop-out: Stored representations or feature-gain modulations? Lee H; Mozer MC; Vecera SP Atten Percept Psychophys; 2009 Jul; 71(5):1059-71. PubMed ID: 19525537 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Semantic priming by irrelevant speech. Röer JP; Körner U; Buchner A; Bell R Psychon Bull Rev; 2017 Aug; 24(4):1205-1210. PubMed ID: 27798754 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Cognitive-behavioral and electrophysiological evidence of the affective consequences of ignoring stimulus representations in working memory. De Vito D; Ferrey AE; Fenske MJ; Al-Aidroos N Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci; 2018 Jun; 18(3):460-475. PubMed ID: 29546688 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Stimulating the parietal cortex by transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS): no effects on attention and memory. Dubravac M; Meier B AIMS Neurosci; 2021; 8(1):33-46. PubMed ID: 33490371 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Stimuli that signal the availability of reward break into attentional focus. Wang L; Li S; Zhou X; Theeuwes J Vision Res; 2018 Mar; 144():20-28. PubMed ID: 29408161 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Conceptual processing of distractors by older but not younger adults. Amer T; Hasher L Psychol Sci; 2014 Dec; 25(12):2252-8. PubMed ID: 25376192 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Intertrial priming due to distractor repetition is eliminated in homogeneous contexts. Feldmann-Wüstefeld T; Schubö A Atten Percept Psychophys; 2016 Oct; 78(7):1935-47. PubMed ID: 27165171 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Oculomotor capture reveals trial-by-trial neural correlates of attentional guidance by contents of visual working memory. Beck VM; Vickery TJ Cortex; 2020 Jan; 122():159-169. PubMed ID: 30392969 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The different roles of category- and feature-specific attentional control settings on attentional enhancement and inhibition. Wu X; Fu S Atten Percept Psychophys; 2017 Oct; 79(7):1968-1978. PubMed ID: 28685488 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Word frequency of irrelevant speech distractors affects serial recall. Buchner A; Erdfelder E Mem Cognit; 2005 Jan; 33(1):86-97. PubMed ID: 15915795 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Learning What Is Irrelevant or Relevant: Expectations Facilitate Distractor Inhibition and Target Facilitation through Distinct Neural Mechanisms. van Moorselaar D; Slagter HA J Neurosci; 2019 Aug; 39(35):6953-6967. PubMed ID: 31270162 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]